文化遗产风险管理的数据收集：通过遗产建筑信息建模（HBIM）项目绘制损坏地图，应用于巴西奥鲁普雷图的圣弗朗西斯外墙

IF 0.8 4区化学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Studies in Conservation Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1080/00393630.2024.2379132

Yacy-Ara Froner, Willi de Barros Gonçalves, Luiz Antônio Cruz Souza, Antônio Gilberto Costa, Alessandra Rosado, Ana Regina Mizrahy Cuperschmid, Guilherme de Oliveira Walter, Ana Carolina Neves Miranda, Guilherme Michelin, Ana Carolina Montalvão, Tiago Hardy

引用次数: 0

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Data Collection for Cultural Heritage Risk Management: the Damage Map through Heritage Building Information Modeling (HBIM ) Project Applied to the Façade of St Francis of Assisi, Ouro Preto, Brazil

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Conservation 化学-分析化学

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Studies in Conservation is the premier international peer-reviewed journal for the conservation of historic and artistic works. The intended readership includes the conservation professional in the broadest sense of the term: practising conservators of all types of object, conservation, heritage and museum scientists, collection or conservation managers, teachers and students of conservation, and academic researchers in the subject areas of arts, archaeology, the built heritage, materials history, art technological research and material culture. Studies in Conservation publishes original work on a range of subjects including, but not limited to, examination methods for works of art, new research in the analysis of artistic materials, mechanisms of deterioration, advances in conservation practice, novel methods of treatment, conservation issues in display and storage, preventive conservation, issues of collection care, conservation history and ethics, and the history of materials and technological processes. Scientific content is not necessary, and the editors encourage the submission of practical articles, review papers, position papers on best practice and the philosophy and ethics of collecting and preservation, to help maintain the traditional balance of the journal. Whatever the subject matter, accounts of routine procedures are not accepted, except where these lead to results that are sufficiently novel and/or significant to be of general interest.