COVID-19 大流行对新诊断出的痴呆症数量以及痴呆症诊断和治疗质量的影响

M. T. Hoang, P. G. Jurado, T. Abzhandadze, S. Mostafaei, M. Mo, M. Åkerman, K. Vestling, C. Chen, H. Xu, M. Eriksdotter, Sara Garcia-Ptacek
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行对新诊断出的痴呆症数量以及痴呆症诊断和治疗质量的影响","authors":"M. T. Hoang, P. G. Jurado, T. Abzhandadze, S. Mostafaei, M. Mo, M. Åkerman, K. Vestling, C. Chen, H. Xu, M. Eriksdotter, Sara Garcia-Ptacek","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2024.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Care trajectories were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, how COVID-19 influenced the number of new dementia diagnoses, and the quality of dementia work-ups, and treatment is understudied.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>To investigate the change in new dementia registrations, diagnostics, and treatment in the pre-, COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 pandemic periods.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design</h3><p>A nationwide cohort study.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Setting</h3><p>This population-based study used data from the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia disorders - SveDem, and other nationwide registries in Sweden.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Participants</h3><p>Persons with dementia diagnosed between 2019 and 2021 were divided into three groups based on the date of diagnosis</p><p>the pre-COVID-19 period (01 January 2019 – 29 February 2020), the COVID-19 period (01 March 2020 – 31 December 2020), and the post-COVID-19 period (01 January 2021 – 31 August 2021).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Measurements</h3><p>Outcomes included dementia diagnostics and treatments.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The monthly average number of new dementia cases registered in SveDem was 595, 415 and 470, respectively in the pre-COVID-19, COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 period. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, the monthly number of registrations decreased, but provision of the basic diagnostic work-up, its individual tests, and the use of cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine and antipsychotics were not significantly different in the COVID-19 period. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, new dementia diagnoses continued to be low in the post-COVID-19 period, but diagnosed individuals were more likely to receive the complete basic diagnostic work-up (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00–1.29), blood analysis (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.44–2.49), computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48), occupational therapy assessment (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.22), and memantine (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07–1.31).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The quantity of new dementia registrations in SveDem decreased in the COVID-19 period and has not returned to pre-COVID-19 levels, but the quality of the work-ups which were conducted and registered in SveDem was similar or higher than in the pre-COVID-19 period. It is imperative to implement policies to increase SveDem registration with the aim of matching or exceeding pre-COVID-19 levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Number of New Dementia Diagnoses and the Quality of Dementia Diagnostics and Treatment\",\"authors\":\"M. T. Hoang, P. G. Jurado, T. Abzhandadze, S. Mostafaei, M. Mo, M. Åkerman, K. Vestling, C. Chen, H. Xu, M. Eriksdotter, Sara Garcia-Ptacek\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jpad.2024.150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Care trajectories were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, how COVID-19 influenced the number of new dementia diagnoses, and the quality of dementia work-ups, and treatment is understudied.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>To investigate the change in new dementia registrations, diagnostics, and treatment in the pre-, COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 pandemic periods.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Design</h3><p>A nationwide cohort study.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Setting</h3><p>This population-based study used data from the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia disorders - SveDem, and other nationwide registries in Sweden.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Participants</h3><p>Persons with dementia diagnosed between 2019 and 2021 were divided into three groups based on the date of diagnosis</p><p>the pre-COVID-19 period (01 January 2019 – 29 February 2020), the COVID-19 period (01 March 2020 – 31 December 2020), and the post-COVID-19 period (01 January 2021 – 31 August 2021).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Measurements</h3><p>Outcomes included dementia diagnostics and treatments.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The monthly average number of new dementia cases registered in SveDem was 595, 415 and 470, respectively in the pre-COVID-19, COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 period. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, the monthly number of registrations decreased, but provision of the basic diagnostic work-up, its individual tests, and the use of cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine and antipsychotics were not significantly different in the COVID-19 period. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, new dementia diagnoses continued to be low in the post-COVID-19 period, but diagnosed individuals were more likely to receive the complete basic diagnostic work-up (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00–1.29), blood analysis (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.44–2.49), computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48), occupational therapy assessment (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.22), and memantine (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07–1.31).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The quantity of new dementia registrations in SveDem decreased in the COVID-19 period and has not returned to pre-COVID-19 levels, but the quality of the work-ups which were conducted and registered in SveDem was similar or higher than in the pre-COVID-19 period. It is imperative to implement policies to increase SveDem registration with the aim of matching or exceeding pre-COVID-19 levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在 COVID-19 大流行期间,护理轨迹被打乱。目标调查 COVID-19 流行前、COVID-19 流行后和 COVID-19 流行后新痴呆症登记、诊断和治疗的变化。参与者2019年至2021年期间确诊的痴呆症患者根据确诊日期分为三组:COVID-19前时期(2019年1月1日至2020年2月29日)、COVID-19时期(2020年3月1日至2020年12月31日)和COVID-19后时期(2021年1月1日至2021年8月31日)。结果在 COVID-19 之前、COVID-19 期间和 COVID-19 之后,SveDem 登记的新痴呆病例月平均数量分别为 595 例、415 例和 470 例。与 COVID-19 前相比,每月登记的病例数有所减少,但在 COVID-19 期间,基本诊断工作的提供、单项检测以及胆碱酯酶抑制剂、美金刚和抗精神病药物的使用均无显著差异。与 COVID-19 前相比,COVID-19 后新诊断出的痴呆症患者人数仍然较少,但已确诊的患者更有可能接受完整的基本诊断检查(OR 1.14,95% CI 1.00-1.29)、血液分析(OR 1.88,95% CI 1.44-2.49)、计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像(OR 1.22,95% CI 1.01-1.48)、职业治疗评估(OR 1.88,95% CI 1.44-2.49)。结论在 COVID-19 期间,SveDem 中新登记的痴呆症患者数量有所减少,且尚未恢复到 COVID-19 之前的水平,但在 SveDem 中进行和登记的工作检查的质量与 COVID-19 之前的水平相似或更高。当务之急是执行增加 SveDem 登记的政策,以达到或超过 19 年前的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Number of New Dementia Diagnoses and the Quality of Dementia Diagnostics and Treatment

Background

Care trajectories were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, how COVID-19 influenced the number of new dementia diagnoses, and the quality of dementia work-ups, and treatment is understudied.

Objective

To investigate the change in new dementia registrations, diagnostics, and treatment in the pre-, COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 pandemic periods.

Design

A nationwide cohort study.

Setting

This population-based study used data from the Swedish Registry for Cognitive/Dementia disorders - SveDem, and other nationwide registries in Sweden.

Participants

Persons with dementia diagnosed between 2019 and 2021 were divided into three groups based on the date of diagnosis

the pre-COVID-19 period (01 January 2019 – 29 February 2020), the COVID-19 period (01 March 2020 – 31 December 2020), and the post-COVID-19 period (01 January 2021 – 31 August 2021).

Measurements

Outcomes included dementia diagnostics and treatments.

Results

The monthly average number of new dementia cases registered in SveDem was 595, 415 and 470, respectively in the pre-COVID-19, COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 period. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, the monthly number of registrations decreased, but provision of the basic diagnostic work-up, its individual tests, and the use of cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine and antipsychotics were not significantly different in the COVID-19 period. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, new dementia diagnoses continued to be low in the post-COVID-19 period, but diagnosed individuals were more likely to receive the complete basic diagnostic work-up (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00–1.29), blood analysis (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.44–2.49), computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48), occupational therapy assessment (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.22), and memantine (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07–1.31).

Conclusion

The quantity of new dementia registrations in SveDem decreased in the COVID-19 period and has not returned to pre-COVID-19 levels, but the quality of the work-ups which were conducted and registered in SveDem was similar or higher than in the pre-COVID-19 period. It is imperative to implement policies to increase SveDem registration with the aim of matching or exceeding pre-COVID-19 levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
期刊最新文献
Association between Cognitive Reserve Indicator and Chronic Disease-Free Survival: A Large Community-Based Longitudinal Study Phase 1 Studies of the Anti-Tau Monoclonal Antibody JNJ-63733657 in Healthy Participants and Participants with Alzheimer’s Disease Roles of TREM2 in the Pathological Mechanism and the Therapeutic Strategies of Alzheimer’s Disease Development and Validation the Mobile Toolbox (MTB) Spelling Test Correlates of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Black American Men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1