贸易与二氧化碳排放的宏观驱动因素相关吗?对高贸易开放度经济体和低贸易开放度经济体的研究

IF 3.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Natural Resources Forum Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1111/1477-8947.12543
Shahida Suleman, Hassanudin Mohd Thas Thaker, Calvin Cheong Wing Hoh
{"title":"贸易与二氧化碳排放的宏观驱动因素相关吗?对高贸易开放度经济体和低贸易开放度经济体的研究","authors":"Shahida Suleman, Hassanudin Mohd Thas Thaker, Calvin Cheong Wing Hoh","doi":"10.1111/1477-8947.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to systematically compare the impact of macro determinants on CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions, using the theoretical frameworks of trade, the Environmental Kuznets Curve, and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. The study specifically focuses on high‐ and low‐trade‐openness economies from 1995 to 2020. Methodologies employed include stepwise regression, fully modified least squares, pooled ordinary least squares, and fixed effects models. Long‐run dynamics were assessed using Granger causality tests and Pedroni and Johansen cointegration tests. The results indicate both long‐term and short‐term relationships between CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions and the following variables: (i) gross capital formation (GCF), (ii) per capita income (PCI), (iii) population (POP), and (iv) trade openness. Trade openness has a positive and significant effect on CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions in highly trade openness economies, whereas it has a negative effect in low trade‐open economies. Highly open economies are more significantly impacted by GCF and POP on CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions compared with low‐ trade openness economies. Additionally, PCI positively and significantly influences CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions in low‐ trade openness countries, and this effect is greater than in high‐ trade openness economies. The study also identifies a bidirectional causal relationship between PCI, GCF, and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions in both groups of economies, as well as a unidirectional relationship between trade openness, POP, and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions in both high‐ and low‐ trade openness countries.","PeriodicalId":49777,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Forum","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is trade relevant to the macro drivers of carbon dioxide emissions? A study of high‐ and low‐trade openness economies\",\"authors\":\"Shahida Suleman, Hassanudin Mohd Thas Thaker, Calvin Cheong Wing Hoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1477-8947.12543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to systematically compare the impact of macro determinants on CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions, using the theoretical frameworks of trade, the Environmental Kuznets Curve, and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. The study specifically focuses on high‐ and low‐trade‐openness economies from 1995 to 2020. Methodologies employed include stepwise regression, fully modified least squares, pooled ordinary least squares, and fixed effects models. Long‐run dynamics were assessed using Granger causality tests and Pedroni and Johansen cointegration tests. The results indicate both long‐term and short‐term relationships between CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions and the following variables: (i) gross capital formation (GCF), (ii) per capita income (PCI), (iii) population (POP), and (iv) trade openness. Trade openness has a positive and significant effect on CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions in highly trade openness economies, whereas it has a negative effect in low trade‐open economies. Highly open economies are more significantly impacted by GCF and POP on CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions compared with low‐ trade openness economies. Additionally, PCI positively and significantly influences CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions in low‐ trade openness countries, and this effect is greater than in high‐ trade openness economies. The study also identifies a bidirectional causal relationship between PCI, GCF, and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions in both groups of economies, as well as a unidirectional relationship between trade openness, POP, and CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions in both high‐ and low‐ trade openness countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources Forum\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是利用贸易、环境库兹涅茨曲线和污染天堂假说等理论框架,系统比较宏观决定因素对二氧化碳排放的影响。研究特别关注 1995 年至 2020 年高贸易开放度经济体和低贸易开放度经济体。采用的方法包括逐步回归、完全修正最小二乘法、集合普通最小二乘法和固定效应模型。使用格兰杰因果检验以及 Pedroni 和 Johansen 协整检验对长期动态进行了评估。结果表明,二氧化碳排放与以下变量之间存在长期和短期关系:(i) 资本形成总额 (GCF),(ii) 人均收入 (PCI),(iii) 人口 (POP) 和 (iv) 贸易开放度。在贸易开放度高的经济体中,贸易开放度对二氧化碳排放有显著的正向影响,而在贸易开放度低的经济体中,贸易开放度对二氧化碳排放有负向影响。与低贸易开放度经济体相比,高贸易开放度经济体受全球合作框架和持久性有机污染物对二氧化碳排放的影响更为明显。此外,PCI 对低贸易开放度国家的二氧化碳排放有积极而显著的影响,而且这种影响大于高贸易开放度经济体。研究还发现,在两组经济体中,国际关注项目、全球合作框架和二氧化碳排放量之间存在双向因果关系,在高贸易开放度和低贸易开放度国家中,贸易开放度、持久性有机污染物和二氧化碳排放量之间存在单向关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is trade relevant to the macro drivers of carbon dioxide emissions? A study of high‐ and low‐trade openness economies
The objective of this research is to systematically compare the impact of macro determinants on CO2 emissions, using the theoretical frameworks of trade, the Environmental Kuznets Curve, and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. The study specifically focuses on high‐ and low‐trade‐openness economies from 1995 to 2020. Methodologies employed include stepwise regression, fully modified least squares, pooled ordinary least squares, and fixed effects models. Long‐run dynamics were assessed using Granger causality tests and Pedroni and Johansen cointegration tests. The results indicate both long‐term and short‐term relationships between CO2 emissions and the following variables: (i) gross capital formation (GCF), (ii) per capita income (PCI), (iii) population (POP), and (iv) trade openness. Trade openness has a positive and significant effect on CO2 emissions in highly trade openness economies, whereas it has a negative effect in low trade‐open economies. Highly open economies are more significantly impacted by GCF and POP on CO2 emissions compared with low‐ trade openness economies. Additionally, PCI positively and significantly influences CO2 emissions in low‐ trade openness countries, and this effect is greater than in high‐ trade openness economies. The study also identifies a bidirectional causal relationship between PCI, GCF, and CO2 emissions in both groups of economies, as well as a unidirectional relationship between trade openness, POP, and CO2 emissions in both high‐ and low‐ trade openness countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Resources Forum
Natural Resources Forum 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Natural Resources Forum, a United Nations Sustainable Development Journal, focuses on international, multidisciplinary issues related to sustainable development, with an emphasis on developing countries. The journal seeks to address gaps in current knowledge and stimulate policy discussions on the most critical issues associated with the sustainable development agenda, by promoting research that integrates the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. Contributions that inform the global policy debate through pragmatic lessons learned from experience at the local, national, and global levels are encouraged. The Journal considers articles written on all topics relevant to sustainable development. In addition, it dedicates series, issues and special sections to specific themes that are relevant to the current discussions of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD). Articles must be based on original research and must be relevant to policy-making. Criteria for selection of submitted articles include: 1) Relevance and importance of the topic discussed to sustainable development in general, both in terms of policy impacts and gaps in current knowledge being addressed by the article; 2) Treatment of the topic that incorporates social, economic and environmental aspects of sustainable development, rather than focusing purely on sectoral and/or technical aspects; 3) Articles must contain original applied material drawn from concrete projects, policy implementation, or literature reviews; purely theoretical papers are not entertained.
期刊最新文献
Trade dependence and cultural distance: An analysis of economic interactions and humanistic exchanges between China and ASEAN countries Can energy intensity, clean energy utilization, economic expansion, and financial development contribute to ecological progress in Iceland? A quantile‐on‐quantile KRLS analysis The nexus of foreign aid, institutional quality, and climate‐related financial policies: Evidence from the global database Impact of foreign direct investment on methane emissions in agriculture: An empirical evidence based on Sub‐Saharan Africa Sustainable development goals, sustainable finance, and financial inclusion: An awareness perspective of business graduates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1