泄漏的天文钟:与 CA-TIMS 相比,激光烧蚀锆石 U-Pb 测定中系统性隐性铅损失的证据

IF 2.2 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Terra Nova Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1111/ter.12742
Benjamin L. Howard, Glenn R. Sharman, James L. Crowley, Ellen Reat Wersan
{"title":"泄漏的天文钟:与 CA-TIMS 相比,激光烧蚀锆石 U-Pb 测定中系统性隐性铅损失的证据","authors":"Benjamin L. Howard, Glenn R. Sharman, James L. Crowley, Ellen Reat Wersan","doi":"10.1111/ter.12742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"U–Pb dating of zircon via laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (LA‐ICP‐MS) has become a primary method for determining the age of crystalline rocks and the provenance and maximum depositional age of (meta)sedimentary rocks. Although chemical abrasion has become a standard approach for mitigating Pb loss in zircon dated via high‐resolution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA‐TIMS), laser ablation dating is rarely accompanied by chemical abrasion. We evaluate the accuracy of U–Pb dates acquired via LA‐ICP‐MS relative to CA‐TIMS through analysis of a large database of paired analyses from the same zircon crystals. We show that laser ablation <jats:sup>206</jats:sup>Pb/<jats:sup>238</jats:sup>U dates are systematically younger than their CA‐TIMS counterparts, with a greater shift in detrital zircon (−2.0%) versus igneous or metamorphic zircon (−0.9%). Although systematic biases related to “matrix effects” may be a contributing factor, our analysis suggests that unmitigated cryptic Pb loss is likely widespread in laser ablation U–Pb datasets.","PeriodicalId":22260,"journal":{"name":"Terra Nova","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The leaky chronometer: Evidence for systematic cryptic Pb loss in laser ablation U‐Pb dating of zircon relative to CA‐TIMS\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin L. Howard, Glenn R. Sharman, James L. Crowley, Ellen Reat Wersan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ter.12742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"U–Pb dating of zircon via laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (LA‐ICP‐MS) has become a primary method for determining the age of crystalline rocks and the provenance and maximum depositional age of (meta)sedimentary rocks. Although chemical abrasion has become a standard approach for mitigating Pb loss in zircon dated via high‐resolution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA‐TIMS), laser ablation dating is rarely accompanied by chemical abrasion. We evaluate the accuracy of U–Pb dates acquired via LA‐ICP‐MS relative to CA‐TIMS through analysis of a large database of paired analyses from the same zircon crystals. We show that laser ablation <jats:sup>206</jats:sup>Pb/<jats:sup>238</jats:sup>U dates are systematically younger than their CA‐TIMS counterparts, with a greater shift in detrital zircon (−2.0%) versus igneous or metamorphic zircon (−0.9%). Although systematic biases related to “matrix effects” may be a contributing factor, our analysis suggests that unmitigated cryptic Pb loss is likely widespread in laser ablation U–Pb datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Terra Nova\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Terra Nova\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12742\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terra Nova","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过激光烧蚀-电感耦合等离子体质谱法(LA-ICP-MS)对锆石进行铀-铅定年,已成为确定结晶岩年龄以及(元)沉积岩产地和最大沉积年龄的主要方法。虽然化学研磨已成为减轻通过高分辨率热电离质谱(CA-TIMS)测定年代的锆石中铅损失的标准方法,但激光烧蚀测定年代很少伴有化学研磨。我们通过分析来自相同锆石晶体的大型配对分析数据库,评估了通过 LA-ICP-MS 获得的 U-Pb 日期相对于 CA-TIMS 的准确性。我们发现,激光烧蚀法获得的 206Pb/238U 日期比 CA-TIMS 法获得的日期要年轻,碎屑锆石(-2.0%)比火成岩或变质岩锆石(-0.9%)的偏移更大。尽管与 "基质效应 "有关的系统性偏差可能是一个促成因素,但我们的分析表明,在激光烧蚀 U-Pb 数据集中,未减轻的隐性铅损失可能很普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The leaky chronometer: Evidence for systematic cryptic Pb loss in laser ablation U‐Pb dating of zircon relative to CA‐TIMS
U–Pb dating of zircon via laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (LA‐ICP‐MS) has become a primary method for determining the age of crystalline rocks and the provenance and maximum depositional age of (meta)sedimentary rocks. Although chemical abrasion has become a standard approach for mitigating Pb loss in zircon dated via high‐resolution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA‐TIMS), laser ablation dating is rarely accompanied by chemical abrasion. We evaluate the accuracy of U–Pb dates acquired via LA‐ICP‐MS relative to CA‐TIMS through analysis of a large database of paired analyses from the same zircon crystals. We show that laser ablation 206Pb/238U dates are systematically younger than their CA‐TIMS counterparts, with a greater shift in detrital zircon (−2.0%) versus igneous or metamorphic zircon (−0.9%). Although systematic biases related to “matrix effects” may be a contributing factor, our analysis suggests that unmitigated cryptic Pb loss is likely widespread in laser ablation U–Pb datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Terra Nova
Terra Nova 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Terra Nova publishes short, innovative and provocative papers of interest to a wide readership and covering the broadest spectrum of the Solid Earth and Planetary Sciences. Terra Nova encompasses geology, geophysics and geochemistry, and extends to the fluid envelopes (atmosphere, ocean, environment) whenever coupling with the Solid Earth is involved.
期刊最新文献
Constraining the Timing of the Closure of the Intra‐Pontide Ocean by U–Pb Dating of Syntectonic Calcite Lead Isotopes Constrain Precambrian Crustal Architecture, Thermal History and Lithospheric Foundering in Laurentia Apparent Joint Swarms Formed by the Crack‐Jump Process CO2‐Rich Xenoliths at Mt. Vulture Volcano (Southern Italy): New Constraints on the Volcano Plumbing System Elevated Tropical Sea Surface Temperatures During the Globally Warm Miocene Caused Heat Stress for Caribbean Coral Reefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1