国家古老与经济进步:原因还是结果?

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Public Choice Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s11127-024-01186-w
M. Scott King, Claudia Williamson Kramer
{"title":"国家古老与经济进步:原因还是结果?","authors":"M. Scott King, Claudia Williamson Kramer","doi":"10.1007/s11127-024-01186-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Legacy of statehood is seen as a positive influence on economic growth and development. The state antiquity literature argues that the more experience a country has with state institutions, the more beneficial the current state’s impact on development can be. While not discounting the advantages that a well-functioning state can provide for economic progress, we draw attention to an alternate mechanism: the presence of private institutions and practices that may contribute to both state formation and economic development. Rather than state antiquity being the lone cause of economic progress, states may benefit from already existing configurations of rules and conventions that were developed privately. Thus, we argue that order can precede and coincide with the state. We support our claim with qualitative evidence using historical case studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48322,"journal":{"name":"Public Choice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State antiquity and economic progress: cause or consequence?\",\"authors\":\"M. Scott King, Claudia Williamson Kramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11127-024-01186-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Legacy of statehood is seen as a positive influence on economic growth and development. The state antiquity literature argues that the more experience a country has with state institutions, the more beneficial the current state’s impact on development can be. While not discounting the advantages that a well-functioning state can provide for economic progress, we draw attention to an alternate mechanism: the presence of private institutions and practices that may contribute to both state formation and economic development. Rather than state antiquity being the lone cause of economic progress, states may benefit from already existing configurations of rules and conventions that were developed privately. Thus, we argue that order can precede and coincide with the state. We support our claim with qualitative evidence using historical case studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Choice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Choice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-024-01186-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Choice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-024-01186-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家遗产被视为对经济增长和发展的积极影响。国家历史文献认为,一个国家的国家机构经验越丰富,当前国家对发展的影响就越有利。我们并不否认一个运作良好的国家能为经济进步带来好处,但我们提请注意另一种机制:私人机构和实践的存在可能有助于国家的形成和经济发展。与其说国家的古老性是经济进步的唯一原因,不如说国家可能受益于已经存在的由私人制定的规则和惯例。因此,我们认为,秩序可以先于国家,也可以与国家同时存在。我们利用历史案例研究的定性证据来支持我们的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State antiquity and economic progress: cause or consequence?

Legacy of statehood is seen as a positive influence on economic growth and development. The state antiquity literature argues that the more experience a country has with state institutions, the more beneficial the current state’s impact on development can be. While not discounting the advantages that a well-functioning state can provide for economic progress, we draw attention to an alternate mechanism: the presence of private institutions and practices that may contribute to both state formation and economic development. Rather than state antiquity being the lone cause of economic progress, states may benefit from already existing configurations of rules and conventions that were developed privately. Thus, we argue that order can precede and coincide with the state. We support our claim with qualitative evidence using historical case studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Choice
Public Choice Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Public Choice deals with the intersection between economics and political science. The journal was founded at a time when economists and political scientists became interested in the application of essentially economic methods to problems normally dealt with by political scientists. It has always retained strong traces of economic methodology, but new and fruitful techniques have been developed which are not recognizable by economists. Public Choice therefore remains central in its chosen role of introducing the two groups to each other, and allowing them to explain themselves through the medium of its pages. Officially cited as: Public Choice
期刊最新文献
Does more democracy encourage individualism?: evidence from women’s suffrage in the US Appealing, threatening or nudging? Assessing various communication strategies to promote tax compliance Equilibrium responses to price controls: a supply-chain approach The medieval church as an economic firm? Government incentives and firm location choices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1