Mohammed R. M. Salem, Shahida Shahimi, Suhaili Alma’amun
{"title":"在解释环境、社会和公司治理与银行财务业绩之间的关系时,调解是否重要?范围审查","authors":"Mohammed R. M. Salem, Shahida Shahimi, Suhaili Alma’amun","doi":"10.3390/jrfm17080350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study identifies and synthesizes patterns and trends in the emerging body of literature of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) endeavors on the financial performance (FP) of the banking firms. It specifically aims to highlight the relationship of ESG–FP. The scoping review analysis is based on 1856 journal articles from two online databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) for the period of 2015 to 2023. The analysis reveals inconsistent results regarding the ESG–FP relationship, with some studies reporting positive impacts, others negative, and several showing no significant relationship. Notably, non-linear studies consistently identify an inverted U-shaped relationship, suggesting that there is a threshold level of ESG investment beyond which additional investments do not yield proportional benefits. This indicates that threshold-based policies may be more effective at maximizing ESG benefits. The study also found that numerous studies suggested exploring the indirect effect or mediating variables in the ESG–FP relationship to better explain the FP variance. Thus, the study identifies a need for future research to explore indirect relationships by testing potential moderators or mediators, particularly bank risk-taking, to better understand the ESG–FP dynamics. Policymakers and regulators should adopt non-linear analytical approaches and set threshold-based ESG investment policies, while bank management should strategically invest in ESG activities, integrating ESG considerations into risk management frameworks. Continuous monitoring and evaluation, along with stakeholder engagement, are crucial for optimizing ESG investments. By adopting these strategies, banks can enhance financial performance and contribute to sustainable and responsible banking practices.","PeriodicalId":47226,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk and Financial Management","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Mediation Matter in Explaining the Relationship between ESG and Bank Financial Performance? A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed R. M. Salem, Shahida Shahimi, Suhaili Alma’amun\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jrfm17080350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study identifies and synthesizes patterns and trends in the emerging body of literature of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) endeavors on the financial performance (FP) of the banking firms. It specifically aims to highlight the relationship of ESG–FP. The scoping review analysis is based on 1856 journal articles from two online databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) for the period of 2015 to 2023. The analysis reveals inconsistent results regarding the ESG–FP relationship, with some studies reporting positive impacts, others negative, and several showing no significant relationship. Notably, non-linear studies consistently identify an inverted U-shaped relationship, suggesting that there is a threshold level of ESG investment beyond which additional investments do not yield proportional benefits. This indicates that threshold-based policies may be more effective at maximizing ESG benefits. The study also found that numerous studies suggested exploring the indirect effect or mediating variables in the ESG–FP relationship to better explain the FP variance. Thus, the study identifies a need for future research to explore indirect relationships by testing potential moderators or mediators, particularly bank risk-taking, to better understand the ESG–FP dynamics. Policymakers and regulators should adopt non-linear analytical approaches and set threshold-based ESG investment policies, while bank management should strategically invest in ESG activities, integrating ESG considerations into risk management frameworks. Continuous monitoring and evaluation, along with stakeholder engagement, are crucial for optimizing ESG investments. By adopting these strategies, banks can enhance financial performance and contribute to sustainable and responsible banking practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Risk and Financial Management\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Risk and Financial Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17080350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk and Financial Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17080350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究对有关环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)努力对银行公司财务绩效(FP)影响的新兴文献中的模式和趋势进行了识别和综合。本研究特别强调了环境、社会和公司治理与财务绩效之间的关系。范围审查分析基于两个在线数据库(即 Scopus 和 Web of Science (WoS))中 2015 年至 2023 年期间的 1856 篇期刊论文。分析显示,ESG-FP 关系的结果并不一致,一些研究报告了积极影响,另一些报告了消极影响,还有几项研究显示没有显著关系。值得注意的是,非线性研究一致确定了一种倒 U 型关系,表明 ESG 投资存在一个门槛水平,超过这一水平,额外投资不会产生相应的收益。这表明,基于临界值的政策可能更有效地实现环境、社会和治理效益的最大化。研究还发现,许多研究建议探索环境、社会和公司治理与生产计划关系中的间接效应或中介变量,以更好地解释生产计划的差异。因此,该研究指出,未来的研究需要通过测试潜在的调节因素或中介变量(尤其是银行的风险承担)来探索间接关系,从而更好地理解 ESG-FP 的动态变化。政策制定者和监管者应采用非线性分析方法,制定基于阈值的环境、社会和治理投资政策,同时银行管理层应战略性地投资于环境、社会和治理活动,将环境、社会和治理因素纳入风险管理框架。持续监测和评估以及利益相关者的参与对于优化环境、社会和公司治理投资至关重要。通过采取这些战略,银行可以提高财务业绩,并为可持续和负责任的银行业务实践做出贡献。
Does Mediation Matter in Explaining the Relationship between ESG and Bank Financial Performance? A Scoping Review
This study identifies and synthesizes patterns and trends in the emerging body of literature of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) endeavors on the financial performance (FP) of the banking firms. It specifically aims to highlight the relationship of ESG–FP. The scoping review analysis is based on 1856 journal articles from two online databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) for the period of 2015 to 2023. The analysis reveals inconsistent results regarding the ESG–FP relationship, with some studies reporting positive impacts, others negative, and several showing no significant relationship. Notably, non-linear studies consistently identify an inverted U-shaped relationship, suggesting that there is a threshold level of ESG investment beyond which additional investments do not yield proportional benefits. This indicates that threshold-based policies may be more effective at maximizing ESG benefits. The study also found that numerous studies suggested exploring the indirect effect or mediating variables in the ESG–FP relationship to better explain the FP variance. Thus, the study identifies a need for future research to explore indirect relationships by testing potential moderators or mediators, particularly bank risk-taking, to better understand the ESG–FP dynamics. Policymakers and regulators should adopt non-linear analytical approaches and set threshold-based ESG investment policies, while bank management should strategically invest in ESG activities, integrating ESG considerations into risk management frameworks. Continuous monitoring and evaluation, along with stakeholder engagement, are crucial for optimizing ESG investments. By adopting these strategies, banks can enhance financial performance and contribute to sustainable and responsible banking practices.