宏观经济复原力的贝叶斯主要成分综合方法:中欧和波罗的海宏观区域案例

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1108/jes-05-2024-0305
Elton Beqiraj, Giovanni Di Bartolomeo, Marco Di Pietro, Carolina Serpieri
{"title":"宏观经济复原力的贝叶斯主要成分综合方法:中欧和波罗的海宏观区域案例","authors":"Elton Beqiraj, Giovanni Di Bartolomeo, Marco Di Pietro, Carolina Serpieri","doi":"10.1108/jes-05-2024-0305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>In the fashion of Martin (2012), we develop an innovative application to a standard, well-grounded methodology to investigate resilience in two critical dimensions: recovery and resistance. Our novel approach allows us to investigate the resilience performance to the 2008 financial crisis within countries of this macro-region according to their shock isolation and absorptive capacities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>By individually estimating six open economy DSGE models within the Central Europe and Baltic macro-region, we identify the business-cycle-volatility drivers for each country. Then, we use the outcome of our six estimates to conduct a principal component analysis to determine structural common characteristics required to explain economic resilience in the CEB macro-region.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>In terms of resilience, Central European economies exhibit quite similar paths in terms of recovery, meaning they have similar economic structures. By contrast, Baltic countries behave differently, being outliers in opposite extreme positions. The contrary occurs for resistance: Baltic countries share a similar ranking, whereas Central European economies exhibit substantial differences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>It is important to acknowledge that a limitation of the analysis is that we explicitly consider each country as a stand-alone open economy which are subject to stochastic disturbances. Precisely, we do not model trade or other interactions across countries within the CEB region and with the rest of the world. Consequently, spillover effects in the aftermath of the shock are not accounted for.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>We estimate the relative vulnerability or sensitivity of economies within the macro-region to disturbances and disruptions (resistance) and the speed and extent of recovery from such a disruption or recession (recovery). First, we built two different kinds of measures of resilience by aggregating the estimated parameters through non-centered and centered principal component analysis. Then, we use our model to investigate the relation between financial shock and the economic resilience across the region. The approach can be applied to several case studies, parsimoniously.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47604,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated Bayesian-principal component approach to macroeconomic resilience: the case of the Central Europe and Baltic macro-region\",\"authors\":\"Elton Beqiraj, Giovanni Di Bartolomeo, Marco Di Pietro, Carolina Serpieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jes-05-2024-0305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>In the fashion of Martin (2012), we develop an innovative application to a standard, well-grounded methodology to investigate resilience in two critical dimensions: recovery and resistance. Our novel approach allows us to investigate the resilience performance to the 2008 financial crisis within countries of this macro-region according to their shock isolation and absorptive capacities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>By individually estimating six open economy DSGE models within the Central Europe and Baltic macro-region, we identify the business-cycle-volatility drivers for each country. Then, we use the outcome of our six estimates to conduct a principal component analysis to determine structural common characteristics required to explain economic resilience in the CEB macro-region.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>In terms of resilience, Central European economies exhibit quite similar paths in terms of recovery, meaning they have similar economic structures. By contrast, Baltic countries behave differently, being outliers in opposite extreme positions. The contrary occurs for resistance: Baltic countries share a similar ranking, whereas Central European economies exhibit substantial differences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>It is important to acknowledge that a limitation of the analysis is that we explicitly consider each country as a stand-alone open economy which are subject to stochastic disturbances. Precisely, we do not model trade or other interactions across countries within the CEB region and with the rest of the world. Consequently, spillover effects in the aftermath of the shock are not accounted for.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>We estimate the relative vulnerability or sensitivity of economies within the macro-region to disturbances and disruptions (resistance) and the speed and extent of recovery from such a disruption or recession (recovery). First, we built two different kinds of measures of resilience by aggregating the estimated parameters through non-centered and centered principal component analysis. Then, we use our model to investigate the relation between financial shock and the economic resilience across the region. The approach can be applied to several case studies, parsimoniously.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-05-2024-0305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-05-2024-0305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 我们仿效马丁(2012 年)的做法,创新性地应用标准的、基础扎实的方法论,从恢复和抵御这两个关键维度研究复原力。我们的新方法使我们能够根据该宏观区域内各国的冲击隔离和吸收能力,研究其对 2008 年金融危机的复原力表现。设计/方法/途径通过单独估计中欧和波罗的海宏观区域内的六个开放经济 DSGE 模型,我们确定了每个国家的商业周期波动驱动因素。然后,我们利用六个估计结果进行主成分分析,以确定解释中欧和波罗的海宏观区域经济韧性所需的结构性共同特征。相比之下,波罗的海国家表现不同,它们是处于相反极端位置的异常值。抵御能力则相反:研究局限性/启示必须承认,分析的局限性在于我们明确地将每个国家视为一个独立的开放经济体,受到随机扰动的影响。确切地说,我们没有模拟行政首长协调会区域内各国之间以及与世界其他国家之间的贸易或其他互动。原创性/价值我们估算了宏观区域内经济体对干扰和破坏的相对脆弱性或敏感性(抵抗力),以及从这种破坏或衰退中恢复的速度和程度(恢复力)。首先,我们通过非中心主成分分析和中心主成分分析对估计参数进行汇总,建立了两种不同的抵抗力衡量标准。然后,我们利用我们的模型来研究金融冲击与整个地区经济韧性之间的关系。该方法可简便地应用于多个案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An integrated Bayesian-principal component approach to macroeconomic resilience: the case of the Central Europe and Baltic macro-region

Purpose

In the fashion of Martin (2012), we develop an innovative application to a standard, well-grounded methodology to investigate resilience in two critical dimensions: recovery and resistance. Our novel approach allows us to investigate the resilience performance to the 2008 financial crisis within countries of this macro-region according to their shock isolation and absorptive capacities.

Design/methodology/approach

By individually estimating six open economy DSGE models within the Central Europe and Baltic macro-region, we identify the business-cycle-volatility drivers for each country. Then, we use the outcome of our six estimates to conduct a principal component analysis to determine structural common characteristics required to explain economic resilience in the CEB macro-region.

Findings

In terms of resilience, Central European economies exhibit quite similar paths in terms of recovery, meaning they have similar economic structures. By contrast, Baltic countries behave differently, being outliers in opposite extreme positions. The contrary occurs for resistance: Baltic countries share a similar ranking, whereas Central European economies exhibit substantial differences.

Research limitations/implications

It is important to acknowledge that a limitation of the analysis is that we explicitly consider each country as a stand-alone open economy which are subject to stochastic disturbances. Precisely, we do not model trade or other interactions across countries within the CEB region and with the rest of the world. Consequently, spillover effects in the aftermath of the shock are not accounted for.

Originality/value

We estimate the relative vulnerability or sensitivity of economies within the macro-region to disturbances and disruptions (resistance) and the speed and extent of recovery from such a disruption or recession (recovery). First, we built two different kinds of measures of resilience by aggregating the estimated parameters through non-centered and centered principal component analysis. Then, we use our model to investigate the relation between financial shock and the economic resilience across the region. The approach can be applied to several case studies, parsimoniously.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Studies publishes high quality research findings and commentary on international developments in economics. The journal maintains a sound balance between economic theory and application at both the micro and the macro levels. Articles on economic issues between individual nations, emerging and evolving trading blocs are particularly welcomed. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work for economists in government and industry
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID on the rate of return to schooling among US industries Analyzing the ICT and economic growth relation in OECD countries Students’ performance and faculty efficiency. Assessing the role of gender through a metafrontier An empirical analysis of climate transition: a global outlook of agriculture productivity Is monopoly truly effective for producers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1