评估商品指数衍生合约的微观和宏观模型

Alberto Manzano, Emanuele Nastasi, Andrea Pallavicini, Carlos Vázquez
{"title":"评估商品指数衍生合约的微观和宏观模型","authors":"Alberto Manzano, Emanuele Nastasi, Andrea Pallavicini, Carlos Vázquez","doi":"arxiv-2408.00784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we analyze two modeling approaches for the pricing of\nderivative contracts on a commodity index. The first one is a microscopic\napproach, where the components of the index are modeled individually, and the\nindex price is derived from their combination. The second one is a macroscopic\napproach, where the index is modeled directly. While the microscopic approach\noffers greater flexibility, its calibration results to be more challenging,\nthus leading practitioners to favor the macroscopic approach. However, in the\nmacroscopic model, the lack of explicit futures curve dynamics raises questions\nabout its ability to accurately capture the behavior of the index and its\nsensitivities. In order to investigate this, we calibrate both models using\nderivatives of the S\\&P GSCI Crude Oil excess-return index and compare their\npricing and sensitivities on path-dependent options, such as autocallable\ncontracts. This research provides insights into the suitability of macroscopic\nmodels for pricing and hedging purposes in real scenarios.","PeriodicalId":501294,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Computational Finance","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Microscopic and Macroscopic Models for Derivative Contracts on Commodity Indices\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Manzano, Emanuele Nastasi, Andrea Pallavicini, Carlos Vázquez\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.00784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we analyze two modeling approaches for the pricing of\\nderivative contracts on a commodity index. The first one is a microscopic\\napproach, where the components of the index are modeled individually, and the\\nindex price is derived from their combination. The second one is a macroscopic\\napproach, where the index is modeled directly. While the microscopic approach\\noffers greater flexibility, its calibration results to be more challenging,\\nthus leading practitioners to favor the macroscopic approach. However, in the\\nmacroscopic model, the lack of explicit futures curve dynamics raises questions\\nabout its ability to accurately capture the behavior of the index and its\\nsensitivities. In order to investigate this, we calibrate both models using\\nderivatives of the S\\\\&P GSCI Crude Oil excess-return index and compare their\\npricing and sensitivities on path-dependent options, such as autocallable\\ncontracts. This research provides insights into the suitability of macroscopic\\nmodels for pricing and hedging purposes in real scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Computational Finance\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Computational Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.00784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Computational Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.00784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了商品指数衍生合约定价的两种建模方法。第一种是微观方法,即对指数的各个组成部分分别建模,然后根据它们的组合得出指数价格。第二种是宏观方法,即直接建立指数模型。虽然微观方法具有更大的灵活性,但其校准结果更具挑战性,因此从业人员更倾向于宏观方法。然而,在宏观模型中,由于缺乏明确的期货曲线动态,人们对其准确捕捉指数行为及其敏感性的能力产生了疑问。为了研究这个问题,我们使用 S\&P GSCI 原油超额收益指数的衍生品校准了这两个模型,并比较了它们对路径依赖期权(如自动赎回合约)的定价和敏感性。这项研究为宏观模型在实际情况下的定价和对冲目的的适用性提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Microscopic and Macroscopic Models for Derivative Contracts on Commodity Indices
In this article, we analyze two modeling approaches for the pricing of derivative contracts on a commodity index. The first one is a microscopic approach, where the components of the index are modeled individually, and the index price is derived from their combination. The second one is a macroscopic approach, where the index is modeled directly. While the microscopic approach offers greater flexibility, its calibration results to be more challenging, thus leading practitioners to favor the macroscopic approach. However, in the macroscopic model, the lack of explicit futures curve dynamics raises questions about its ability to accurately capture the behavior of the index and its sensitivities. In order to investigate this, we calibrate both models using derivatives of the S\&P GSCI Crude Oil excess-return index and compare their pricing and sensitivities on path-dependent options, such as autocallable contracts. This research provides insights into the suitability of macroscopic models for pricing and hedging purposes in real scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A deep primal-dual BSDE method for optimal stopping problems Robust financial calibration: a Bayesian approach for neural SDEs MANA-Net: Mitigating Aggregated Sentiment Homogenization with News Weighting for Enhanced Market Prediction QuantFactor REINFORCE: Mining Steady Formulaic Alpha Factors with Variance-bounded REINFORCE Signature of maturity in cryptocurrency volatility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1