{"title":"多径室内 VLC 系统的 3D 定位误差分析","authors":"Karibasappa Rangappa, Ajit Kumar","doi":"10.1002/dac.5937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A comparative analysis of 3D positioning error for two different configurations using different layouts of visible light communication (VLC) systems is presented in this paper. The Received Signal Strength (RSS) has been implemented for indoor localization systems using Line-of-Sight (LoS) and diffused reflection signals. The room size for configuration-1 is 5 m × 5 m × 3 m, and the distance between adjacent LEDs is 2.5 m, 2.00 m, and 1.5 m for cases-1, case-2, and case-3, respectively, whereas the room size for configuration-2 is 7 m × 7 m × 5 m, and the separation between the LEDs is 3.5 m, 3 m, and 2.5 m for their respective cases. Through investigation, it has been shown that when only LS signal is considered, the separation between LEDs may not be an issue because positioning error changes by a very small amount as the separation between LEDs changes. The results show that as the distance between adjacent LEDs decreases, the received signal strength for LoS and L-R1 signals increases. However, positioning error and BER rise, while the bit rate falls. Furthermore, the positioning error Vs receiver plane height for all three cases in configuration-1 is the same up to a height of 2.89 m, whereas the positioning error in configuration-2 is the same up to 4.4 m for all cases. The positioning error for case-1 decreases as the height in configuration-1 exceeds 2.89 m. Similarly, after reaching a height of 4.4 m for case-2, the positioning error in configuration-2 decreases. The LoS positioning error versus semi angle \n<span></span><math>\n <msub>\n <mi>φ</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub></math> of the LED as well as the FOV of the receiver has been simulated for different positions of the receiver in configuration-1. The investigation shows that the minimum positioning error is achieved at \n<span></span><math>\n <msub>\n <mi>φ</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub></math> and FOV equal to 66.66<sup>0</sup> for all the positions of the receiver in the room. Thus, before configuring a practical indoor VLC geometrical model, proper VLC configurations such as LED separation, FOV of the receiver, semi angle of LED, and receiver height should be chosen based on the room dimensions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13946,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication Systems","volume":"37 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of 3D positioning error for multipath indoor VLC system\",\"authors\":\"Karibasappa Rangappa, Ajit Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dac.5937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>A comparative analysis of 3D positioning error for two different configurations using different layouts of visible light communication (VLC) systems is presented in this paper. The Received Signal Strength (RSS) has been implemented for indoor localization systems using Line-of-Sight (LoS) and diffused reflection signals. The room size for configuration-1 is 5 m × 5 m × 3 m, and the distance between adjacent LEDs is 2.5 m, 2.00 m, and 1.5 m for cases-1, case-2, and case-3, respectively, whereas the room size for configuration-2 is 7 m × 7 m × 5 m, and the separation between the LEDs is 3.5 m, 3 m, and 2.5 m for their respective cases. Through investigation, it has been shown that when only LS signal is considered, the separation between LEDs may not be an issue because positioning error changes by a very small amount as the separation between LEDs changes. The results show that as the distance between adjacent LEDs decreases, the received signal strength for LoS and L-R1 signals increases. However, positioning error and BER rise, while the bit rate falls. Furthermore, the positioning error Vs receiver plane height for all three cases in configuration-1 is the same up to a height of 2.89 m, whereas the positioning error in configuration-2 is the same up to 4.4 m for all cases. The positioning error for case-1 decreases as the height in configuration-1 exceeds 2.89 m. Similarly, after reaching a height of 4.4 m for case-2, the positioning error in configuration-2 decreases. The LoS positioning error versus semi angle \\n<span></span><math>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>φ</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub></math> of the LED as well as the FOV of the receiver has been simulated for different positions of the receiver in configuration-1. The investigation shows that the minimum positioning error is achieved at \\n<span></span><math>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>φ</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub></math> and FOV equal to 66.66<sup>0</sup> for all the positions of the receiver in the room. Thus, before configuring a practical indoor VLC geometrical model, proper VLC configurations such as LED separation, FOV of the receiver, semi angle of LED, and receiver height should be chosen based on the room dimensions.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Communication Systems\",\"volume\":\"37 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Communication Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dac.5937\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dac.5937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 本文对使用不同布局的可见光通信(VLC)系统的两种不同配置的三维定位误差进行了比较分析。室内定位系统使用视线(LoS)和漫反射信号实现了接收信号强度(RSS)。配置-1 的房间大小为 5 m × 5 m × 3 m,相邻 LED 之间的距离分别为 2.5 m、2.00 m 和 1.5 m,而配置-2 的房间大小为 7 m × 7 m × 5 m,LED 之间的距离分别为 3.5 m、3 m 和 2.5 m。调查表明,当只考虑 LS 信号时,LED 之间的间距可能不是问题,因为随着 LED 间距的变化,定位误差的变化非常小。结果表明,随着相邻 LED 之间距离的减小,LoS 和 L-R1 信号的接收信号强度会增加。然而,定位误差和误码率上升,而比特率下降。此外,在配置-1 中,所有三种情况的定位误差 Vs 接收机平面高度在 2.89 米高度内是相同的,而在配置-2 中,所有情况的定位误差在 4.4 米高度内是相同的。情况-1 的定位误差随着配置-1 的高度超过 2.89 米而减小。针对配置-1 中接收器的不同位置,模拟了 LoS 定位误差与 LED 半角以及接收器 FOV 的关系。调查显示,在室内所有接收器位置上,当 FOV 等于 66.660 时,定位误差最小。因此,在配置实用的室内 VLC 几何模型之前,应根据房间尺寸选择适当的 VLC 配置,如 LED 间隔、接收器 FOV、LED 半角和接收器高度。
Analysis of 3D positioning error for multipath indoor VLC system
A comparative analysis of 3D positioning error for two different configurations using different layouts of visible light communication (VLC) systems is presented in this paper. The Received Signal Strength (RSS) has been implemented for indoor localization systems using Line-of-Sight (LoS) and diffused reflection signals. The room size for configuration-1 is 5 m × 5 m × 3 m, and the distance between adjacent LEDs is 2.5 m, 2.00 m, and 1.5 m for cases-1, case-2, and case-3, respectively, whereas the room size for configuration-2 is 7 m × 7 m × 5 m, and the separation between the LEDs is 3.5 m, 3 m, and 2.5 m for their respective cases. Through investigation, it has been shown that when only LS signal is considered, the separation between LEDs may not be an issue because positioning error changes by a very small amount as the separation between LEDs changes. The results show that as the distance between adjacent LEDs decreases, the received signal strength for LoS and L-R1 signals increases. However, positioning error and BER rise, while the bit rate falls. Furthermore, the positioning error Vs receiver plane height for all three cases in configuration-1 is the same up to a height of 2.89 m, whereas the positioning error in configuration-2 is the same up to 4.4 m for all cases. The positioning error for case-1 decreases as the height in configuration-1 exceeds 2.89 m. Similarly, after reaching a height of 4.4 m for case-2, the positioning error in configuration-2 decreases. The LoS positioning error versus semi angle
of the LED as well as the FOV of the receiver has been simulated for different positions of the receiver in configuration-1. The investigation shows that the minimum positioning error is achieved at
and FOV equal to 66.660 for all the positions of the receiver in the room. Thus, before configuring a practical indoor VLC geometrical model, proper VLC configurations such as LED separation, FOV of the receiver, semi angle of LED, and receiver height should be chosen based on the room dimensions.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Communication Systems provides a forum for R&D, open to researchers from all types of institutions and organisations worldwide, aimed at the increasingly important area of communication technology. The Journal''s emphasis is particularly on the issues impacting behaviour at the system, service and management levels. Published twelve times a year, it provides coverage of advances that have a significant potential to impact the immense technical and commercial opportunities in the communications sector. The International Journal of Communication Systems strives to select a balance of contributions that promotes technical innovation allied to practical relevance across the range of system types and issues.
The Journal addresses both public communication systems (Telecommunication, mobile, Internet, and Cable TV) and private systems (Intranets, enterprise networks, LANs, MANs, WANs). The following key areas and issues are regularly covered:
-Transmission/Switching/Distribution technologies (ATM, SDH, TCP/IP, routers, DSL, cable modems, VoD, VoIP, WDM, etc.)
-System control, network/service management
-Network and Internet protocols and standards
-Client-server, distributed and Web-based communication systems
-Broadband and multimedia systems and applications, with a focus on increased service variety and interactivity
-Trials of advanced systems and services; their implementation and evaluation
-Novel concepts and improvements in technique; their theoretical basis and performance analysis using measurement/testing, modelling and simulation
-Performance evaluation issues and methods.