变性恐惧症合法化:从法庭到立法机构,性别批判激进主义如何伤害我们所有人

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1111/jols.12491
MARK AUSTIN WALTERS
{"title":"变性恐惧症合法化:从法庭到立法机构,性别批判激进主义如何伤害我们所有人","authors":"MARK AUSTIN WALTERS","doi":"10.1111/jols.12491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article scrutinizes the strategic legal and political actions taken by gender-critical feminist (GCF) scholars and activists aimed at curtailing protections afforded under existing equality law and criminal justice policies that safeguard transgender individuals against discrimination and victimization. Two prominent legal judgments are critically reviewed to highlight the phenomenon of crowdfunded litigation and to exemplify the ways in which the law can be (mis)used to shape public perceptions of trans identities and, consequently, how this impacts trans individuals’ full and equal participation in society. The subsequent analysis examines how the previous and current governments’ support of the GCF movement has led to newly proposed, and recently enacted, legislation and policies restricting trans rights and legal protections. The article concludes by reflecting on how these coordinated legal interventions detrimentally affect the emotional, physical, and social well-being of trans individuals, while simultaneously contributing to a broader political narrative aimed at dismantling protections against discrimination and victimization for all marginalized groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"51 3","pages":"343-366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.12491","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legalizing transphobia: from courtroom to legislature, how gender-critical activism is hurting us all\",\"authors\":\"MARK AUSTIN WALTERS\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jols.12491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article scrutinizes the strategic legal and political actions taken by gender-critical feminist (GCF) scholars and activists aimed at curtailing protections afforded under existing equality law and criminal justice policies that safeguard transgender individuals against discrimination and victimization. Two prominent legal judgments are critically reviewed to highlight the phenomenon of crowdfunded litigation and to exemplify the ways in which the law can be (mis)used to shape public perceptions of trans identities and, consequently, how this impacts trans individuals’ full and equal participation in society. The subsequent analysis examines how the previous and current governments’ support of the GCF movement has led to newly proposed, and recently enacted, legislation and policies restricting trans rights and legal protections. The article concludes by reflecting on how these coordinated legal interventions detrimentally affect the emotional, physical, and social well-being of trans individuals, while simultaneously contributing to a broader political narrative aimed at dismantling protections against discrimination and victimization for all marginalized groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"343-366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.12491\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12491\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文仔细研究了性别批判女权(GCF)学者和活动家采取的战略性法律和政治行动,这些行动旨在削弱现行平等法和刑事司法政策所提供的保护,以保障跨性别者免受歧视和伤害。本文对两个著名的法律判决进行了批判性评述,以突出众筹诉讼现象,并举例说明法律如何被(误)用于塑造公众对变性身份的看法,以及由此如何影响变性人充分、平等地参与社会。随后的分析探讨了前任政府和现任政府对 GCF 运动的支持如何导致新提出并在近期颁布了限制跨性别权利和法律保护的立法和政策。文章最后反思了这些协调的法律干预措施是如何对变性人的情感、身体和社会福祉产生不利影响的,同时又是如何助长了一种更广泛的政治叙事,旨在瓦解针对所有边缘化群体的歧视和伤害保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legalizing transphobia: from courtroom to legislature, how gender-critical activism is hurting us all

This article scrutinizes the strategic legal and political actions taken by gender-critical feminist (GCF) scholars and activists aimed at curtailing protections afforded under existing equality law and criminal justice policies that safeguard transgender individuals against discrimination and victimization. Two prominent legal judgments are critically reviewed to highlight the phenomenon of crowdfunded litigation and to exemplify the ways in which the law can be (mis)used to shape public perceptions of trans identities and, consequently, how this impacts trans individuals’ full and equal participation in society. The subsequent analysis examines how the previous and current governments’ support of the GCF movement has led to newly proposed, and recently enacted, legislation and policies restricting trans rights and legal protections. The article concludes by reflecting on how these coordinated legal interventions detrimentally affect the emotional, physical, and social well-being of trans individuals, while simultaneously contributing to a broader political narrative aimed at dismantling protections against discrimination and victimization for all marginalized groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information ‘On a knife's edge’: medical, police, and legal responses to self-harming protesters It could be my son! ‘Himpathy’ and the male fear defence in rape trials ‘Worthy survivors’ of domestic violence in the eyes of the Beijing courts When less is less: the complexities of growth and the degrowth company
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1