Danilo Giffoni de Mello Morais Mata, Mary-Beth Rush, Megan Smith-Uffen, Jawaid Younus, Ana Elisa Lohmann, Maureen Trudeau, Rebecca L. Morgan
{"title":"早期 HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者不接受蒽环类化疗--系统综述与元分析","authors":"Danilo Giffoni de Mello Morais Mata, Mary-Beth Rush, Megan Smith-Uffen, Jawaid Younus, Ana Elisa Lohmann, Maureen Trudeau, Rebecca L. Morgan","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31080335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anthracycline-taxane is the standard chemotherapy strategy for treating high-risk early breast cancer despite the potentially life-threatening adverse events caused by anthracyclines. Commonly, the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) is considered an alternative option. However, the efficacy of TC compared to anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy is unclear. This study compares disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cardiotoxicity between adjuvant TC and anthracycline-taxane for stages I–III, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: A systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized-controlled trials published until 11 March 2024, yielded 203 studies with 11,803 patients, and seven trials were included. Results: TC results in little to no difference in DFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.20; moderate-certainty of evidence); OS (1.02, 95% CI 0.89–1.16; high-certainty of evidence); and cardiotoxicity (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; high-certainty of evidence), compared to anthracycline-taxane. In the subgroup analysis, patients with ≥4 lymph nodes had improved DFS from anthracycline-taxane over TC. Conclusions: Overall, there was no difference between TC and anthracycline-taxane in DFS, OS and cardiotoxicity. In women with ≥4 nodes, anthracycline-taxane was associated with a substantial reduction in relapse events, compared to TC. Our study supports the current standard of practice, which is to use anthracycline-taxane and TC chemotherapy as a reasonable option in select cases.","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Omission of Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Women with Early HER2-Negative Breast Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Giffoni de Mello Morais Mata, Mary-Beth Rush, Megan Smith-Uffen, Jawaid Younus, Ana Elisa Lohmann, Maureen Trudeau, Rebecca L. Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31080335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Anthracycline-taxane is the standard chemotherapy strategy for treating high-risk early breast cancer despite the potentially life-threatening adverse events caused by anthracyclines. Commonly, the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) is considered an alternative option. However, the efficacy of TC compared to anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy is unclear. This study compares disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cardiotoxicity between adjuvant TC and anthracycline-taxane for stages I–III, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: A systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized-controlled trials published until 11 March 2024, yielded 203 studies with 11,803 patients, and seven trials were included. Results: TC results in little to no difference in DFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.20; moderate-certainty of evidence); OS (1.02, 95% CI 0.89–1.16; high-certainty of evidence); and cardiotoxicity (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; high-certainty of evidence), compared to anthracycline-taxane. In the subgroup analysis, patients with ≥4 lymph nodes had improved DFS from anthracycline-taxane over TC. Conclusions: Overall, there was no difference between TC and anthracycline-taxane in DFS, OS and cardiotoxicity. In women with ≥4 nodes, anthracycline-taxane was associated with a substantial reduction in relapse events, compared to TC. Our study supports the current standard of practice, which is to use anthracycline-taxane and TC chemotherapy as a reasonable option in select cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080335\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管蒽环类药物可能会导致危及生命的不良反应,但蒽环类-他赛类药物是治疗高危早期乳腺癌的标准化疗策略。多西他赛和环磷酰胺(TC)联合疗法通常被认为是一种替代选择。然而,与蒽环类-他烷类化疗相比,多西他赛联合环磷酰胺化疗的疗效尚不明确。本研究比较了 I-III 期 HER2 阴性乳腺癌辅助 TC 和蒽环类-他烷化疗的无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和心脏毒性。研究方法在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL上系统检索了截至2024年3月11日发表的随机对照试验,共获得203项研究,11803名患者,其中纳入了7项试验。研究结果与蒽环类-他卡西酮相比,TC在DFS(HR 1.09,95% CI 0.98-1.20;中度证据确定性)、OS(1.02,95% CI 0.89-1.16;高度证据确定性)和心脏毒性(RR 0.54,95% CI 0.16-1.76;高度证据确定性)方面几乎没有差异。在亚组分析中,淋巴结≥4个的患者使用蒽环类紫杉烷比使用TC的DFS有所改善。结论总体而言,在DFS、OS和心脏毒性方面,TC和蒽环类紫杉烷没有差异。对于≥4个结节的女性患者,蒽环类紫杉烷与TC相比可显著减少复发事件。我们的研究支持目前的实践标准,即在特定病例中使用蒽环类紫杉烷和TC化疗作为合理的选择。
The Omission of Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Women with Early HER2-Negative Breast Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Anthracycline-taxane is the standard chemotherapy strategy for treating high-risk early breast cancer despite the potentially life-threatening adverse events caused by anthracyclines. Commonly, the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) is considered an alternative option. However, the efficacy of TC compared to anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy is unclear. This study compares disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cardiotoxicity between adjuvant TC and anthracycline-taxane for stages I–III, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: A systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized-controlled trials published until 11 March 2024, yielded 203 studies with 11,803 patients, and seven trials were included. Results: TC results in little to no difference in DFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.20; moderate-certainty of evidence); OS (1.02, 95% CI 0.89–1.16; high-certainty of evidence); and cardiotoxicity (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; high-certainty of evidence), compared to anthracycline-taxane. In the subgroup analysis, patients with ≥4 lymph nodes had improved DFS from anthracycline-taxane over TC. Conclusions: Overall, there was no difference between TC and anthracycline-taxane in DFS, OS and cardiotoxicity. In women with ≥4 nodes, anthracycline-taxane was associated with a substantial reduction in relapse events, compared to TC. Our study supports the current standard of practice, which is to use anthracycline-taxane and TC chemotherapy as a reasonable option in select cases.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.