{"title":"一种简单快速的鲁棒非线性模型预测控制启发式,使用[公式省略]-步前不确定性预测进行后退计算","authors":"H.A. Krog, J. Jäschke","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2024.103270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A new robust nonlinear model predictive control (RNMPC) heuristic is proposed, specifically developed to be i) easy to implement, ii) robust against constraint violations and iii) fast to solve. Our proposed heuristic samples from the disturbance distributions and performs <span><math><mi>n</mi></math></span>-steps-ahead Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to calculate the back-off where <span><math><mi>n</mi></math></span> is a small number, typically one. We show two implementations of our heuristic. The Automatic Back-off Calculation NMPC (ABC-NMPC) uses MC simulations on a process model to calculate the back-off, and <em>explicitly</em> states the back-off in a standard NMPC problem. Our second implementation, the MC Single-Stage NMPC (MCSS-NMPC), directly includes the disturbance distribution in the optimization problem, making it an <em>implicit</em> back-off method. Our methods are robust against constraint violation in the next time-step, under certain assumptions. In the presented case-study, our proposed RNMPC methods outperform the popular multi-stage NMPC in terms of robustness and/or computational cost. We suggest several further modifications to our RNMPC methods to improve performance, at the cost of increased complexity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Process Control","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 103270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simple and fast robust nonlinear model predictive control heuristic using n-steps-ahead uncertainty predictions for back-off calculations\",\"authors\":\"H.A. Krog, J. Jäschke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jprocont.2024.103270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A new robust nonlinear model predictive control (RNMPC) heuristic is proposed, specifically developed to be i) easy to implement, ii) robust against constraint violations and iii) fast to solve. Our proposed heuristic samples from the disturbance distributions and performs <span><math><mi>n</mi></math></span>-steps-ahead Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to calculate the back-off where <span><math><mi>n</mi></math></span> is a small number, typically one. We show two implementations of our heuristic. The Automatic Back-off Calculation NMPC (ABC-NMPC) uses MC simulations on a process model to calculate the back-off, and <em>explicitly</em> states the back-off in a standard NMPC problem. Our second implementation, the MC Single-Stage NMPC (MCSS-NMPC), directly includes the disturbance distribution in the optimization problem, making it an <em>implicit</em> back-off method. Our methods are robust against constraint violation in the next time-step, under certain assumptions. In the presented case-study, our proposed RNMPC methods outperform the popular multi-stage NMPC in terms of robustness and/or computational cost. We suggest several further modifications to our RNMPC methods to improve performance, at the cost of increased complexity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Process Control\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Process Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152424001100\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Process Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152424001100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文提出了一种新的鲁棒非线性模型预测控制(RNMPC)启发式,其具体特点是:i)易于实施;ii)对违反约束具有鲁棒性;iii)求解速度快。我们提出的启发式从扰动分布中采样,并执行提前一步的蒙特卡洛(MC)模拟,以计算偏移量,其中偏移量是一个小数,通常为 1。我们展示了启发式的两种实现方法。自动偏置计算 NMPC(ABC-NMPC)使用对过程模型的 MC 仿真来计算偏置,并在标准 NMPC 问题中说明偏置。我们的第二种实现方法是 MC 单级 NMPC (MCSS-NMPC),它直接将扰动分布纳入优化问题,使其成为一种后退方法。在某些假设条件下,我们的方法对下一时间步的约束条件违反具有鲁棒性。在案例研究中,我们提出的 RNMPC 方法在鲁棒性和/或计算成本方面优于流行的多阶段 NMPC。我们建议进一步修改 RNMPC 方法,以提高性能,但代价是增加复杂性。
A simple and fast robust nonlinear model predictive control heuristic using n-steps-ahead uncertainty predictions for back-off calculations
A new robust nonlinear model predictive control (RNMPC) heuristic is proposed, specifically developed to be i) easy to implement, ii) robust against constraint violations and iii) fast to solve. Our proposed heuristic samples from the disturbance distributions and performs -steps-ahead Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to calculate the back-off where is a small number, typically one. We show two implementations of our heuristic. The Automatic Back-off Calculation NMPC (ABC-NMPC) uses MC simulations on a process model to calculate the back-off, and explicitly states the back-off in a standard NMPC problem. Our second implementation, the MC Single-Stage NMPC (MCSS-NMPC), directly includes the disturbance distribution in the optimization problem, making it an implicit back-off method. Our methods are robust against constraint violation in the next time-step, under certain assumptions. In the presented case-study, our proposed RNMPC methods outperform the popular multi-stage NMPC in terms of robustness and/or computational cost. We suggest several further modifications to our RNMPC methods to improve performance, at the cost of increased complexity.
期刊介绍:
This international journal covers the application of control theory, operations research, computer science and engineering principles to the solution of process control problems. In addition to the traditional chemical processing and manufacturing applications, the scope of process control problems involves a wide range of applications that includes energy processes, nano-technology, systems biology, bio-medical engineering, pharmaceutical processing technology, energy storage and conversion, smart grid, and data analytics among others.
Papers on the theory in these areas will also be accepted provided the theoretical contribution is aimed at the application and the development of process control techniques.
Topics covered include:
• Control applications• Process monitoring• Plant-wide control• Process control systems• Control techniques and algorithms• Process modelling and simulation• Design methods
Advanced design methods exclude well established and widely studied traditional design techniques such as PID tuning and its many variants. Applications in fields such as control of automotive engines, machinery and robotics are not deemed suitable unless a clear motivation for the relevance to process control is provided.