静息态脑电图揭示阿尔茨海默氏症和额颞叶痴呆症的区域脑活动相关性

Ali Azargoonjahromi, Hamide Nasiri, Fatemeh Abutalebian
{"title":"静息态脑电图揭示阿尔茨海默氏症和额颞叶痴呆症的区域脑活动相关性","authors":"Ali Azargoonjahromi, Hamide Nasiri, Fatemeh Abutalebian","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.05.24311520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resting-state EEG records brain activity when awake but not engaged in tasks, analyzing frequency bands linked to cognitive states. Recent studies on Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have found a link between EEG activity, MMSE scores, and age, though some findings are conflicting. This study aimed to explore EEG regional differences among AD and FTD, thereby improving diagnostic strategies. We analyzed EEG recordings from 88 participants in OpenNeuro Dataset ds004504, collected at AHEPA General Hospital using a Nihon Kohden 2100 EEG device. The study used preprocessed recordings, classification algorithms, and cognitive function assessments (MMSE) to identify significant predictors and correlations between EEG measures and cognitive variables. The study revealed that cognitive function, age, and brain activity show distinct relationships in AD and FTD. In AD, MMSE scores significantly predicted brain activity in regions like C3, C4, T4, and Fz, with better cognitive performance linked to higher EEG power in frontal and temporal areas. Conversely, age had a major influence on brain activity in FTD, particularly in regions like C3, P3, O1, and O2, while MMSE scores did not significantly predict brain activity. In FTD, higher EEG power in regions like P3, P4, Cz, and Pz correlated with lower cognitive function. Thus, the findings suggest that EEG biomarkers can enhance diagnostic strategies by highlighting different patterns of brain activity related to cognitive function and age in AD and FTD.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resting-State EEG Reveals Regional Brain Activity Correlates in Alzheimer's and Frontotemporal Dementia\",\"authors\":\"Ali Azargoonjahromi, Hamide Nasiri, Fatemeh Abutalebian\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.05.24311520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resting-state EEG records brain activity when awake but not engaged in tasks, analyzing frequency bands linked to cognitive states. Recent studies on Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have found a link between EEG activity, MMSE scores, and age, though some findings are conflicting. This study aimed to explore EEG regional differences among AD and FTD, thereby improving diagnostic strategies. We analyzed EEG recordings from 88 participants in OpenNeuro Dataset ds004504, collected at AHEPA General Hospital using a Nihon Kohden 2100 EEG device. The study used preprocessed recordings, classification algorithms, and cognitive function assessments (MMSE) to identify significant predictors and correlations between EEG measures and cognitive variables. The study revealed that cognitive function, age, and brain activity show distinct relationships in AD and FTD. In AD, MMSE scores significantly predicted brain activity in regions like C3, C4, T4, and Fz, with better cognitive performance linked to higher EEG power in frontal and temporal areas. Conversely, age had a major influence on brain activity in FTD, particularly in regions like C3, P3, O1, and O2, while MMSE scores did not significantly predict brain activity. In FTD, higher EEG power in regions like P3, P4, Cz, and Pz correlated with lower cognitive function. Thus, the findings suggest that EEG biomarkers can enhance diagnostic strategies by highlighting different patterns of brain activity related to cognitive function and age in AD and FTD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静息状态脑电图记录清醒但未参与任务时的大脑活动,分析与认知状态相关的频段。最近对阿尔茨海默病(AD)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)的研究发现,脑电图活动、MMSE评分和年龄之间存在联系,但有些研究结果相互矛盾。本研究旨在探索 AD 和 FTD 的脑电图区域差异,从而改进诊断策略。我们分析了 OpenNeuro 数据集 ds004504 中 88 名参与者的脑电图记录,这些记录是在 AHEPA 综合医院使用 Nihon Kohden 2100 脑电图设备收集的。研究使用预处理记录、分类算法和认知功能评估(MMSE)来确定脑电图测量与认知变量之间的重要预测因素和相关性。研究显示,认知功能、年龄和大脑活动在 AD 和 FTD 中显示出不同的关系。在注意力缺失症患者中,MMSE评分可显著预测C3、C4、T4和Fz等区域的大脑活动,认知能力越好,额叶和颞叶区域的脑电图功率越高。相反,年龄对 FTD 患者的大脑活动有很大影响,尤其是在 C3、P3、O1 和 O2 等区域,而 MMSE 分数对大脑活动的预测作用并不明显。在 FTD 患者中,P3、P4、Cz 和 Pz 等区域较高的脑电图功率与较低的认知功能相关。因此,研究结果表明,脑电图生物标记物可以突出显示 AD 和 FTD 中与认知功能和年龄相关的大脑活动的不同模式,从而加强诊断策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resting-State EEG Reveals Regional Brain Activity Correlates in Alzheimer's and Frontotemporal Dementia
Resting-state EEG records brain activity when awake but not engaged in tasks, analyzing frequency bands linked to cognitive states. Recent studies on Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have found a link between EEG activity, MMSE scores, and age, though some findings are conflicting. This study aimed to explore EEG regional differences among AD and FTD, thereby improving diagnostic strategies. We analyzed EEG recordings from 88 participants in OpenNeuro Dataset ds004504, collected at AHEPA General Hospital using a Nihon Kohden 2100 EEG device. The study used preprocessed recordings, classification algorithms, and cognitive function assessments (MMSE) to identify significant predictors and correlations between EEG measures and cognitive variables. The study revealed that cognitive function, age, and brain activity show distinct relationships in AD and FTD. In AD, MMSE scores significantly predicted brain activity in regions like C3, C4, T4, and Fz, with better cognitive performance linked to higher EEG power in frontal and temporal areas. Conversely, age had a major influence on brain activity in FTD, particularly in regions like C3, P3, O1, and O2, while MMSE scores did not significantly predict brain activity. In FTD, higher EEG power in regions like P3, P4, Cz, and Pz correlated with lower cognitive function. Thus, the findings suggest that EEG biomarkers can enhance diagnostic strategies by highlighting different patterns of brain activity related to cognitive function and age in AD and FTD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological markers of brain network connectivity and pain sensitivity distinguish low coping from high coping Veterans with persistent post-traumatic headache Association of Item-Level Responses to Cognitive Function Index with Tau Pathology and Hippocampal volume in The A4 Study EpiSemoLLM: A Fine-tuned Large Language Model for Epileptogenic Zone Localization Based on Seizure Semiology with a Performance Comparable to Epileptologists Selective effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic degeneration on cognition in Parkinson's disease The Relationship Between Electrodermal Activity and Cardiac Troponin in Patients with Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1