{"title":"密集图类的扩展保持","authors":"Ioannis Eleftheriadis","doi":"arxiv-2408.02388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preservation theorems provide a direct correspondence between the syntactic\nstructure of first-order sentences and the closure properties of their\nrespective classes of models. A line of work has explored preservation theorems\nrelativised to combinatorially tame classes of sparse structures [Atserias et\nal., JACM 2006; Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008; Dawar, JCSS 2010; Dawar and\nEleftheriadis, 2024]. In this article we initiate the study of preservation\ntheorems for dense graph classes. In contrast to the sparse setting, we show\nthat extension preservation fails on most natural dense classes of low\ncomplexity. Nonetheless, we isolate a technical condition which is sufficient\nfor extension preservation to hold, providing a dense analogue to a result of\n[Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008].","PeriodicalId":501208,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","volume":"193 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extension preservation on dense graph classes\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Eleftheriadis\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.02388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preservation theorems provide a direct correspondence between the syntactic\\nstructure of first-order sentences and the closure properties of their\\nrespective classes of models. A line of work has explored preservation theorems\\nrelativised to combinatorially tame classes of sparse structures [Atserias et\\nal., JACM 2006; Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008; Dawar, JCSS 2010; Dawar and\\nEleftheriadis, 2024]. In this article we initiate the study of preservation\\ntheorems for dense graph classes. In contrast to the sparse setting, we show\\nthat extension preservation fails on most natural dense classes of low\\ncomplexity. Nonetheless, we isolate a technical condition which is sufficient\\nfor extension preservation to hold, providing a dense analogue to a result of\\n[Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008].\",\"PeriodicalId\":501208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"193 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
保存定理提供了一阶句子的句法结构与其相应类别模型的闭合属性之间的直接对应关系。有一系列工作探索了将保存定理衍生到组合驯服的稀疏结构类[Atserias etal., JACM 2006; Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008; Dawar, JCSS 2010; Dawar andEleftheriadis, 2024]。在本文中,我们将开始研究密集图类的保存定理。与稀疏设置不同,我们证明在大多数低复杂度的自然稠密类上,扩展保存都是失败的。尽管如此,我们还是分离出了一个足以使扩展保持成立的技术条件,为[Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008]的一个结果提供了一个稠密类。
Preservation theorems provide a direct correspondence between the syntactic
structure of first-order sentences and the closure properties of their
respective classes of models. A line of work has explored preservation theorems
relativised to combinatorially tame classes of sparse structures [Atserias et
al., JACM 2006; Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008; Dawar, JCSS 2010; Dawar and
Eleftheriadis, 2024]. In this article we initiate the study of preservation
theorems for dense graph classes. In contrast to the sparse setting, we show
that extension preservation fails on most natural dense classes of low
complexity. Nonetheless, we isolate a technical condition which is sufficient
for extension preservation to hold, providing a dense analogue to a result of
[Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008].