检测复杂农场环境中奶牛发声率的声学传感器

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Applied Animal Behaviour Science Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106377
Paul.R. Shorten, Laura.B. Hunter
{"title":"检测复杂农场环境中奶牛发声率的声学传感器","authors":"Paul.R. Shorten,&nbsp;Laura.B. Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Acoustic technologies provide a method to investigate cow vocalization. This study demonstrated that collar attached acoustic sensors can determine vocalization from continuous acoustic recordings of cows under grazing conditions. In this study a total of 4843 vocalizations from 10 cows were observed over 3 days. Algorithms were developed to differentiate cow vocalization from other farm noises and the F1-statistic for the vocalization classification model was 95% for the test dataset. Models for the rate of vocalization per cow (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99), average vocalization duration per cow (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.83), and the coefficient of variation (CV) of duration of vocalization per cow (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73) in the validation dataset demonstrate that it is feasible to determine vocalization traits that provide information on the state of the animal. There was also significant between-cow variation in the vocalization traits examined in this study, with a rate of vocalization per cow that ranged from 20 to 584 events day<sup>-1</sup>, an average duration of vocalization per cow that ranged from 1.0 to 1.4<!--> <!-->s, a CV of duration of vocalization per cow that ranged from 0.28 to 0.42. The transition probabilities between vocalization type (closed, mixed, open mouth) were also calculated for each cow and there was a 1.3 to 14-fold between-cow variation in the transition probabilities. The total number of vocalizations per hour interval was highly variable and ranged from zero to 250 vocalizations, depending on cow and time of day. The cows largely vocalized at similar times of the day, although we demonstrated that the technology could identify cows that differ in their pattern of vocalization relative to the herd and relative to their vocalization patterns on previous days. These models can be used to investigate the role of management and environmental factors on cow vocalization, and to develop technologies that respond to cow vocalization behaviour.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"278 ","pages":"Article 106377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic sensors to detect the rate of cow vocalization in a complex farm environment\",\"authors\":\"Paul.R. Shorten,&nbsp;Laura.B. Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Acoustic technologies provide a method to investigate cow vocalization. This study demonstrated that collar attached acoustic sensors can determine vocalization from continuous acoustic recordings of cows under grazing conditions. In this study a total of 4843 vocalizations from 10 cows were observed over 3 days. Algorithms were developed to differentiate cow vocalization from other farm noises and the F1-statistic for the vocalization classification model was 95% for the test dataset. Models for the rate of vocalization per cow (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99), average vocalization duration per cow (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.83), and the coefficient of variation (CV) of duration of vocalization per cow (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73) in the validation dataset demonstrate that it is feasible to determine vocalization traits that provide information on the state of the animal. There was also significant between-cow variation in the vocalization traits examined in this study, with a rate of vocalization per cow that ranged from 20 to 584 events day<sup>-1</sup>, an average duration of vocalization per cow that ranged from 1.0 to 1.4<!--> <!-->s, a CV of duration of vocalization per cow that ranged from 0.28 to 0.42. The transition probabilities between vocalization type (closed, mixed, open mouth) were also calculated for each cow and there was a 1.3 to 14-fold between-cow variation in the transition probabilities. The total number of vocalizations per hour interval was highly variable and ranged from zero to 250 vocalizations, depending on cow and time of day. The cows largely vocalized at similar times of the day, although we demonstrated that the technology could identify cows that differ in their pattern of vocalization relative to the herd and relative to their vocalization patterns on previous days. These models can be used to investigate the role of management and environmental factors on cow vocalization, and to develop technologies that respond to cow vocalization behaviour.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"278 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124002259\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124002259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

声学技术提供了一种研究奶牛发声的方法。这项研究表明,颈圈附带的声学传感器可以通过连续的声学记录确定奶牛在放牧条件下的发声情况。在这项研究中,共观察到 10 头奶牛在 3 天内发出的 4843 次发声。在测试数据集中,发声分类模型的 F1 统计量为 95%。验证数据集中每头奶牛的发声率(R = 0.99)、每头奶牛的平均发声持续时间(R = 0.83)和每头奶牛发声持续时间的变异系数(CV)(R = 0.73)的模型表明,确定可提供动物状态信息的发声特征是可行的。本研究考察的发声特征也存在明显的牛间差异,每头奶牛每天的发声率从20次到584次不等,每头奶牛的平均发声持续时间从1.0秒到1.4秒不等,每头奶牛发声持续时间的CV值从0.28到0.42不等。还计算了每头奶牛在不同发声类型(闭口、混合、张口)之间的转换概率,不同奶牛之间的转换概率相差1.3-14倍。每小时的发声总数变化很大,从零到 250 次不等,取决于奶牛和一天中的不同时间。虽然奶牛在一天中的大部分时间都在发声,但我们证明,该技术可以识别出相对于牛群及其前几天发声模式不同的奶牛。这些模型可用于研究管理和环境因素对奶牛发声的影响,以及开发能对奶牛发声行为做出反应的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acoustic sensors to detect the rate of cow vocalization in a complex farm environment

Acoustic technologies provide a method to investigate cow vocalization. This study demonstrated that collar attached acoustic sensors can determine vocalization from continuous acoustic recordings of cows under grazing conditions. In this study a total of 4843 vocalizations from 10 cows were observed over 3 days. Algorithms were developed to differentiate cow vocalization from other farm noises and the F1-statistic for the vocalization classification model was 95% for the test dataset. Models for the rate of vocalization per cow (R2 = 0.99), average vocalization duration per cow (R2 = 0.83), and the coefficient of variation (CV) of duration of vocalization per cow (R2 = 0.73) in the validation dataset demonstrate that it is feasible to determine vocalization traits that provide information on the state of the animal. There was also significant between-cow variation in the vocalization traits examined in this study, with a rate of vocalization per cow that ranged from 20 to 584 events day-1, an average duration of vocalization per cow that ranged from 1.0 to 1.4 s, a CV of duration of vocalization per cow that ranged from 0.28 to 0.42. The transition probabilities between vocalization type (closed, mixed, open mouth) were also calculated for each cow and there was a 1.3 to 14-fold between-cow variation in the transition probabilities. The total number of vocalizations per hour interval was highly variable and ranged from zero to 250 vocalizations, depending on cow and time of day. The cows largely vocalized at similar times of the day, although we demonstrated that the technology could identify cows that differ in their pattern of vocalization relative to the herd and relative to their vocalization patterns on previous days. These models can be used to investigate the role of management and environmental factors on cow vocalization, and to develop technologies that respond to cow vocalization behaviour.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
期刊最新文献
Enjoy the silence: Preference and short-term effect of exposure to different acoustical stimuli in dogs The influence of scented toy enrichment on owned dog activity levels in a household setting Assessing the effect of counterconditioning to reduce neophobic response in horses (Equus ferus Caballus) Field evaluation of cat fur and TMT odours as repellents of commensal rodents in poultry farms More inattentive dogs benefit from repetitive but not permissive training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1