{"title":"通过正常化血糖/HbA1c 比值快速诊断暴发性 1 型糖尿病","authors":"Jun-Ichiro Mori, Takahiro Miyakoshi, Hanae Yuzuriha, Teruki Kondo, Eita Nishimori, Motoji Naka, Ai Sato, Mitsuhisa Komatsu, Koh Yamashita, Toru Aizawa","doi":"10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p>Elevated Fulminant Index (FI), [plasma glucose (PG)/glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)], was reportedly a sensitive index to differentiate fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) from non-fulminant T1D (nFT1D). Aim of this study was to describe a better, but simpler index of FT1D. 49 and 52 patients with FT1D and nFT1D, respectively, were registered, and the discriminating ability of the rounded, normalized ratio, [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0], and the original ratio, [PG (mmol/L)]/[HbA1c (%)], was compared. Normalizing the ratio significantly raised its accuracy: area under the curve for receiver operating curve, AUROC (95%CI), 0.927 (0.858–0.964) and 0.851 (0.763–0.910), respectively, with and without the normalization (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Rounding of the figure into [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0] did not significantly sacrifice the discriminating ability of the index. Namely, the optimal cut point of rounded and normalized GAR, 10.0, showed 89.8% sensitivity. In conclusion, rounded, normalized (rn) GAR ≥10 (the rounded optimal cut-off) could be used for the snap diagnosis of FT1D.</p>\n<p></p>\n<img alt=\"\" src=\"https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/pub/endocrj/advpub/0/advpub_EJ24-0226/figure/advpub_EJ24-0226.jpg\"/>\n<span style=\"padding-left:5px;\">Fullsize Image</span>","PeriodicalId":11631,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Snap diagnosis of fulminant type 1 diabetes by the normalized glucose/HbA1c ratio\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Ichiro Mori, Takahiro Miyakoshi, Hanae Yuzuriha, Teruki Kondo, Eita Nishimori, Motoji Naka, Ai Sato, Mitsuhisa Komatsu, Koh Yamashita, Toru Aizawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"</p><p>Elevated Fulminant Index (FI), [plasma glucose (PG)/glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)], was reportedly a sensitive index to differentiate fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) from non-fulminant T1D (nFT1D). Aim of this study was to describe a better, but simpler index of FT1D. 49 and 52 patients with FT1D and nFT1D, respectively, were registered, and the discriminating ability of the rounded, normalized ratio, [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0], and the original ratio, [PG (mmol/L)]/[HbA1c (%)], was compared. Normalizing the ratio significantly raised its accuracy: area under the curve for receiver operating curve, AUROC (95%CI), 0.927 (0.858–0.964) and 0.851 (0.763–0.910), respectively, with and without the normalization (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Rounding of the figure into [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0] did not significantly sacrifice the discriminating ability of the index. Namely, the optimal cut point of rounded and normalized GAR, 10.0, showed 89.8% sensitivity. In conclusion, rounded, normalized (rn) GAR ≥10 (the rounded optimal cut-off) could be used for the snap diagnosis of FT1D.</p>\\n<p></p>\\n<img alt=\\\"\\\" src=\\\"https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/pub/endocrj/advpub/0/advpub_EJ24-0226/figure/advpub_EJ24-0226.jpg\\\"/>\\n<span style=\\\"padding-left:5px;\\\">Fullsize Image</span>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine journal\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Snap diagnosis of fulminant type 1 diabetes by the normalized glucose/HbA1c ratio
Elevated Fulminant Index (FI), [plasma glucose (PG)/glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)], was reportedly a sensitive index to differentiate fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) from non-fulminant T1D (nFT1D). Aim of this study was to describe a better, but simpler index of FT1D. 49 and 52 patients with FT1D and nFT1D, respectively, were registered, and the discriminating ability of the rounded, normalized ratio, [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0], and the original ratio, [PG (mmol/L)]/[HbA1c (%)], was compared. Normalizing the ratio significantly raised its accuracy: area under the curve for receiver operating curve, AUROC (95%CI), 0.927 (0.858–0.964) and 0.851 (0.763–0.910), respectively, with and without the normalization (p < 0.01). Rounding of the figure into [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0] did not significantly sacrifice the discriminating ability of the index. Namely, the optimal cut point of rounded and normalized GAR, 10.0, showed 89.8% sensitivity. In conclusion, rounded, normalized (rn) GAR ≥10 (the rounded optimal cut-off) could be used for the snap diagnosis of FT1D.
期刊介绍:
Endocrine Journal is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal with a long history. This journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles in multifaceted fields of basic, translational and clinical endocrinology. Endocrine Journal provides a chance to exchange your ideas, concepts and scientific observations in any area of recent endocrinology. Manuscripts may be submitted as Original Articles, Notes, Rapid Communications or Review Articles. We have a rapid reviewing and editorial decision system and pay a special attention to our quick, truly scientific and frequently-citable publication. Please go through the link for author guideline.