通过正常化血糖/HbA1c 比值快速诊断暴发性 1 型糖尿病

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine journal Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226
Jun-Ichiro Mori, Takahiro Miyakoshi, Hanae Yuzuriha, Teruki Kondo, Eita Nishimori, Motoji Naka, Ai Sato, Mitsuhisa Komatsu, Koh Yamashita, Toru Aizawa
{"title":"通过正常化血糖/HbA1c 比值快速诊断暴发性 1 型糖尿病","authors":"Jun-Ichiro Mori, Takahiro Miyakoshi, Hanae Yuzuriha, Teruki Kondo, Eita Nishimori, Motoji Naka, Ai Sato, Mitsuhisa Komatsu, Koh Yamashita, Toru Aizawa","doi":"10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p>Elevated Fulminant Index (FI), [plasma glucose (PG)/glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)], was reportedly a sensitive index to differentiate fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) from non-fulminant T1D (nFT1D). Aim of this study was to describe a better, but simpler index of FT1D. 49 and 52 patients with FT1D and nFT1D, respectively, were registered, and the discriminating ability of the rounded, normalized ratio, [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0], and the original ratio, [PG (mmol/L)]/[HbA1c (%)], was compared. Normalizing the ratio significantly raised its accuracy: area under the curve for receiver operating curve, AUROC (95%CI), 0.927 (0.858–0.964) and 0.851 (0.763–0.910), respectively, with and without the normalization (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Rounding of the figure into [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0] did not significantly sacrifice the discriminating ability of the index. Namely, the optimal cut point of rounded and normalized GAR, 10.0, showed 89.8% sensitivity. In conclusion, rounded, normalized (rn) GAR ≥10 (the rounded optimal cut-off) could be used for the snap diagnosis of FT1D.</p>\n<p></p>\n<img alt=\"\" src=\"https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/pub/endocrj/advpub/0/advpub_EJ24-0226/figure/advpub_EJ24-0226.jpg\"/>\n<span style=\"padding-left:5px;\">Fullsize Image</span>","PeriodicalId":11631,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Snap diagnosis of fulminant type 1 diabetes by the normalized glucose/HbA1c ratio\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Ichiro Mori, Takahiro Miyakoshi, Hanae Yuzuriha, Teruki Kondo, Eita Nishimori, Motoji Naka, Ai Sato, Mitsuhisa Komatsu, Koh Yamashita, Toru Aizawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"</p><p>Elevated Fulminant Index (FI), [plasma glucose (PG)/glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)], was reportedly a sensitive index to differentiate fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) from non-fulminant T1D (nFT1D). Aim of this study was to describe a better, but simpler index of FT1D. 49 and 52 patients with FT1D and nFT1D, respectively, were registered, and the discriminating ability of the rounded, normalized ratio, [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0], and the original ratio, [PG (mmol/L)]/[HbA1c (%)], was compared. Normalizing the ratio significantly raised its accuracy: area under the curve for receiver operating curve, AUROC (95%CI), 0.927 (0.858–0.964) and 0.851 (0.763–0.910), respectively, with and without the normalization (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Rounding of the figure into [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0] did not significantly sacrifice the discriminating ability of the index. Namely, the optimal cut point of rounded and normalized GAR, 10.0, showed 89.8% sensitivity. In conclusion, rounded, normalized (rn) GAR ≥10 (the rounded optimal cut-off) could be used for the snap diagnosis of FT1D.</p>\\n<p></p>\\n<img alt=\\\"\\\" src=\\\"https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/pub/endocrj/advpub/0/advpub_EJ24-0226/figure/advpub_EJ24-0226.jpg\\\"/>\\n<span style=\\\"padding-left:5px;\\\">Fullsize Image</span>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine journal\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.ej24-0226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,升高的暴发性指数(FI)[血浆葡萄糖(PG)/糖基化血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)]是区分暴发性 1 型糖尿病(FT1D)和非暴发性 1 型糖尿病(nFT1D)的敏感指数。本研究旨在描述一种更好但更简单的 FT1D 指标。研究分别登记了 49 名和 52 名 FT1D 和 nFT1D 患者,并比较了四舍五入后的正常化比值[PG(mmol/L)-5.0]/[HbA1c(%)-5.0]和原始比值[PG(mmol/L)]/[HbA1c(%)]的鉴别能力。对比率进行归一化处理可明显提高其准确性:进行和未进行归一化处理的接收者操作曲线下面积 AUROC(95%CI)分别为 0.927(0.858-0.964)和 0.851(0.763-0.910)(p <0.01)。将数字四舍五入为[PG(mmol/L)-5.0]/[HbA1c(%)-5.0]并不会明显影响指数的判别能力。也就是说,四舍五入和归一化 GAR 的最佳切点(10.0)显示了 89.8% 的灵敏度。总之,四舍五入归一化(rn)GAR ≥10(四舍五入最佳切点)可用于快速诊断 FT1D。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Snap diagnosis of fulminant type 1 diabetes by the normalized glucose/HbA1c ratio

Elevated Fulminant Index (FI), [plasma glucose (PG)/glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)], was reportedly a sensitive index to differentiate fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) from non-fulminant T1D (nFT1D). Aim of this study was to describe a better, but simpler index of FT1D. 49 and 52 patients with FT1D and nFT1D, respectively, were registered, and the discriminating ability of the rounded, normalized ratio, [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0], and the original ratio, [PG (mmol/L)]/[HbA1c (%)], was compared. Normalizing the ratio significantly raised its accuracy: area under the curve for receiver operating curve, AUROC (95%CI), 0.927 (0.858–0.964) and 0.851 (0.763–0.910), respectively, with and without the normalization (p < 0.01). Rounding of the figure into [PG (mmol/L) – 5.0]/[HbA1c (%) – 5.0] did not significantly sacrifice the discriminating ability of the index. Namely, the optimal cut point of rounded and normalized GAR, 10.0, showed 89.8% sensitivity. In conclusion, rounded, normalized (rn) GAR ≥10 (the rounded optimal cut-off) could be used for the snap diagnosis of FT1D.

Fullsize Image
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine journal
Endocrine journal 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Endocrine Journal is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal with a long history. This journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles in multifaceted fields of basic, translational and clinical endocrinology. Endocrine Journal provides a chance to exchange your ideas, concepts and scientific observations in any area of recent endocrinology. Manuscripts may be submitted as Original Articles, Notes, Rapid Communications or Review Articles. We have a rapid reviewing and editorial decision system and pay a special attention to our quick, truly scientific and frequently-citable publication. Please go through the link for author guideline.
期刊最新文献
Physiological and pathophysiological actions of insulin in the liver. Role of radiologists in the diagnosis and management of adrenal disorders. Management of thyroid tumors diagnosed cytologically as follicular neoplasms in a high-volume center: utility of a scoring system using serum thyroglobulin level, tumor size, ultrasound testing, and cytological diagnosis. Associations between muscle quality and whole-body vibration exercise-induced changes in plasma hypoxanthine following an oral glucose load in healthy male subjects. Dose-response relationship between the fatty liver index and asthma risk: NHANES 2001~2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1