根据单根桩的验证荷载试验校准桩群的阻力系数

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structural Safety Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102517
Yuting Zhang , Jinsong Huang , Jiawei Xie , Shan Huang , Yankun Wang
{"title":"根据单根桩的验证荷载试验校准桩群的阻力系数","authors":"Yuting Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinsong Huang ,&nbsp;Jiawei Xie ,&nbsp;Shan Huang ,&nbsp;Yankun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pile load tests have been utilized to reduce the uncertainty of pile resistance, thus leading to a higher resistance factor used in the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Previous studies have primarily focused on calibrating resistance factors for single piles based on load tests. This calibration hinges upon the resistance bias factor of single piles, defined as the ratio of measured resistance to predicted resistance. Due to the redundancy in the pile group system, it is conventionally assumed that if the individual piles within the group achieve a lower reliability index (e.g., 2.0–2.5), the pile group as a whole attains the target reliability index of 3. However, the approach is empirical as it does not consider system redundancy directly. Moreover, this empirical approach disregards the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles, which is inherently influenced by the spatial variability of soils. In this study, the random finite difference method (RFDM) is employed to evaluate the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles in spatially variable soils. The resultant correlation matrix is subsequentially employed in Bayes’ theorem to update resistance bias factors using individual pile load test results and their corresponding test locations. The updated resistance bias factors are then used for the direct calibration of resistance factors for pile groups within the framework of LRFD. A pile group subject to vertical loading in undrained clays is adopted for illustration. Comparative analyses between the proposed approach and the empirical approach demonstrate that the latter tends to overestimate the resistance factor. Furthermore, the proposed approach enables the determination of optimal locations for conducting subsequent load tests based on previous test results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21978,"journal":{"name":"Structural Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473024000882/pdfft?md5=c13c52be39ce8682f3bc3102422121c5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167473024000882-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibrating resistance factors of pile groups based on individual pile proof load tests\",\"authors\":\"Yuting Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinsong Huang ,&nbsp;Jiawei Xie ,&nbsp;Shan Huang ,&nbsp;Yankun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pile load tests have been utilized to reduce the uncertainty of pile resistance, thus leading to a higher resistance factor used in the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Previous studies have primarily focused on calibrating resistance factors for single piles based on load tests. This calibration hinges upon the resistance bias factor of single piles, defined as the ratio of measured resistance to predicted resistance. Due to the redundancy in the pile group system, it is conventionally assumed that if the individual piles within the group achieve a lower reliability index (e.g., 2.0–2.5), the pile group as a whole attains the target reliability index of 3. However, the approach is empirical as it does not consider system redundancy directly. Moreover, this empirical approach disregards the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles, which is inherently influenced by the spatial variability of soils. In this study, the random finite difference method (RFDM) is employed to evaluate the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles in spatially variable soils. The resultant correlation matrix is subsequentially employed in Bayes’ theorem to update resistance bias factors using individual pile load test results and their corresponding test locations. The updated resistance bias factors are then used for the direct calibration of resistance factors for pile groups within the framework of LRFD. A pile group subject to vertical loading in undrained clays is adopted for illustration. Comparative analyses between the proposed approach and the empirical approach demonstrate that the latter tends to overestimate the resistance factor. Furthermore, the proposed approach enables the determination of optimal locations for conducting subsequent load tests based on previous test results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473024000882/pdfft?md5=c13c52be39ce8682f3bc3102422121c5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167473024000882-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473024000882\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473024000882","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用桩载荷试验可减少桩抗力的不确定性,从而提高载荷和抗力系数设计(LRFD)中使用的抗力系数。以往的研究主要侧重于根据荷载试验校准单桩的阻力系数。这种校准取决于单桩的阻力偏置系数,即测量阻力与预测阻力之比。由于桩群系统中存在冗余,传统的假设是,如果桩群中的单个桩达到较低的可靠性指数(如 2.0-2.5),则桩群整体达到 3 的目标可靠性指数。此外,这种经验方法忽略了单个桩的阻力偏置系数之间的相关性,而这种相关性本身就受到土壤空间变化的影响。本研究采用随机有限差分法(RFDM)来评估空间可变土壤中单个桩的阻力偏置系数之间的相关性。随后,利用贝叶斯定理,利用单个桩荷载测试结果及其相应的测试位置更新由此得出的相关矩阵的阻力偏置系数。更新后的阻力偏置系数将用于在 LRFD 框架内直接校准桩群的阻力系数。以在排水性粘土中承受垂直荷载的桩群为例进行说明。建议方法与经验方法的对比分析表明,后者往往会高估阻力系数。此外,建议的方法还能根据之前的测试结果确定进行后续荷载测试的最佳位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Calibrating resistance factors of pile groups based on individual pile proof load tests

Pile load tests have been utilized to reduce the uncertainty of pile resistance, thus leading to a higher resistance factor used in the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Previous studies have primarily focused on calibrating resistance factors for single piles based on load tests. This calibration hinges upon the resistance bias factor of single piles, defined as the ratio of measured resistance to predicted resistance. Due to the redundancy in the pile group system, it is conventionally assumed that if the individual piles within the group achieve a lower reliability index (e.g., 2.0–2.5), the pile group as a whole attains the target reliability index of 3. However, the approach is empirical as it does not consider system redundancy directly. Moreover, this empirical approach disregards the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles, which is inherently influenced by the spatial variability of soils. In this study, the random finite difference method (RFDM) is employed to evaluate the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles in spatially variable soils. The resultant correlation matrix is subsequentially employed in Bayes’ theorem to update resistance bias factors using individual pile load test results and their corresponding test locations. The updated resistance bias factors are then used for the direct calibration of resistance factors for pile groups within the framework of LRFD. A pile group subject to vertical loading in undrained clays is adopted for illustration. Comparative analyses between the proposed approach and the empirical approach demonstrate that the latter tends to overestimate the resistance factor. Furthermore, the proposed approach enables the determination of optimal locations for conducting subsequent load tests based on previous test results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Safety
Structural Safety 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Structural Safety is an international journal devoted to integrated risk assessment for a wide range of constructed facilities such as buildings, bridges, earth structures, offshore facilities, dams, lifelines and nuclear structural systems. Its purpose is to foster communication about risk and reliability among technical disciplines involved in design and construction, and to enhance the use of risk management in the constructed environment
期刊最新文献
Bivariate cubic normal distribution for non-Gaussian problems Yet another Bayesian active learning reliability analysis method Improved Bayesian model updating of geomaterial parameters for slope reliability assessment considering spatial variability Editorial Board Data-enhanced design charts for efficient reliability-based design of geotechnical systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1