社会经济地位刻板印象影响运动学习

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Learning and Motivation Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102026
Marco Jordanio Pereira Feitosa Lima , Suzete Chiviacowsky , Ricardo Drews , Priscila Cardozo
{"title":"社会经济地位刻板印象影响运动学习","authors":"Marco Jordanio Pereira Feitosa Lima ,&nbsp;Suzete Chiviacowsky ,&nbsp;Ricardo Drews ,&nbsp;Priscila Cardozo","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research evidence suggests that different populations may have impaired motor performance and learning due to practice conditions with negative gender, weight, and age stereotypes. The effects of socioeconomic stereotypes on motor learning, however, are still unknown. The present study investigated the effects of the low socioeconomic status stereotype on learning a motor skill. Participants, low-income young adults of both sexes (mean age 26.6 ± 4.63 years), were randomized into two groups: stereotype threat (ST) and nullified stereotype threat (NST). Before practicing a spatiotemporal accuracy skill on the computer, participants were told that people with middle and high income generally perform better on the task than people with low income (ST), or that performance on the task is not influenced by individual differences (NST). Learning, or relatively permanent effects on performance, was measured one day after practice via a retention test. The results revealed similar performance of the groups during the practice phase (<em>p</em> = .065). However, the stereotype threat group performed significantly worse on the task than the nullified stereotype threat group on the retention test (<em>p</em> = .039). These findings provide the first evidence that socioeconomic stereotypes can affect motor learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 102026"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic status stereotype affects motor learning\",\"authors\":\"Marco Jordanio Pereira Feitosa Lima ,&nbsp;Suzete Chiviacowsky ,&nbsp;Ricardo Drews ,&nbsp;Priscila Cardozo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research evidence suggests that different populations may have impaired motor performance and learning due to practice conditions with negative gender, weight, and age stereotypes. The effects of socioeconomic stereotypes on motor learning, however, are still unknown. The present study investigated the effects of the low socioeconomic status stereotype on learning a motor skill. Participants, low-income young adults of both sexes (mean age 26.6 ± 4.63 years), were randomized into two groups: stereotype threat (ST) and nullified stereotype threat (NST). Before practicing a spatiotemporal accuracy skill on the computer, participants were told that people with middle and high income generally perform better on the task than people with low income (ST), or that performance on the task is not influenced by individual differences (NST). Learning, or relatively permanent effects on performance, was measured one day after practice via a retention test. The results revealed similar performance of the groups during the practice phase (<em>p</em> = .065). However, the stereotype threat group performed significantly worse on the task than the nullified stereotype threat group on the retention test (<em>p</em> = .039). These findings provide the first evidence that socioeconomic stereotypes can affect motor learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000687\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究证据表明,不同人群的运动表现和学习能力可能会因性别、体重和年龄方面的负面刻板印象而受到影响。然而,社会经济刻板印象对运动学习的影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了社会经济地位低的刻板印象对学习运动技能的影响。被试是低收入的男女青年(平均年龄为 26.6 ± 4.63 岁),他们被随机分为两组:刻板印象威胁组(ST)和消除刻板印象威胁组(NST)。在电脑上练习一项时空准确性技能之前,参与者会被告知:中高收入人群在这项任务上的表现通常优于低收入人群(ST),或者这项任务的表现不受个体差异的影响(NST)。在练习一天后,通过保留测试测量学习效果,即对成绩的相对永久性影响。结果显示,各组在练习阶段的表现相似(= 0.065)。然而,在保留测试中,刻板印象威胁组的任务表现明显差于消除刻板印象威胁组(= 0.039)。这些发现首次证明了社会经济刻板印象会影响运动学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socioeconomic status stereotype affects motor learning

Research evidence suggests that different populations may have impaired motor performance and learning due to practice conditions with negative gender, weight, and age stereotypes. The effects of socioeconomic stereotypes on motor learning, however, are still unknown. The present study investigated the effects of the low socioeconomic status stereotype on learning a motor skill. Participants, low-income young adults of both sexes (mean age 26.6 ± 4.63 years), were randomized into two groups: stereotype threat (ST) and nullified stereotype threat (NST). Before practicing a spatiotemporal accuracy skill on the computer, participants were told that people with middle and high income generally perform better on the task than people with low income (ST), or that performance on the task is not influenced by individual differences (NST). Learning, or relatively permanent effects on performance, was measured one day after practice via a retention test. The results revealed similar performance of the groups during the practice phase (p = .065). However, the stereotype threat group performed significantly worse on the task than the nullified stereotype threat group on the retention test (p = .039). These findings provide the first evidence that socioeconomic stereotypes can affect motor learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Degraded contingency effect on running-based flavor aversion in rats: Testing the associative cue-competition account with flavors of minimal similarity Examining the role of classroom climate and teacher-student relationships in EFL students’ perceived learning outcomes: A self-determination theory perspective Effect of Raha syrup on the motivational effects of morphine and CSF serotonin levels in rats The mediating role of self-efficacy between high school students’ perceived teacher support and mathematics feedback literacy Metacognitive training for algebra teaching to high school students: An action research study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1