公司治理质量指数与伊斯兰银行的风险承担

Umar Habibu Umar, Muhamad Abduh, Mohd Hairul Azrin Besar
{"title":"公司治理质量指数与伊斯兰银行的风险承担","authors":"Umar Habibu Umar, Muhamad Abduh, Mohd Hairul Azrin Besar","doi":"10.1057/s41310-024-00260-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study used the board of directors, risk management committee (RMC), audit committee (AC) and Shari’a supervisory board (SSB) attributes and constructed a comprehensive corporate governance (CG) quality index and sub-indices to explore their influence on Islamic bank risk-taking. It used unbalanced panel data manually collected over 12 years (2010–2021) generated from the annual reports of a sample of 43 fully Shari'a-compliant Islamic banks operating in 15 different countries. Using the two-step system GMM estimator as a major regression, the findings indicate a significant positive relationship between the CG quality index and credit risk. Concerning sub-indices, board and AC quality sub-indices have a significant negative and positive association with credit risk. However, RMC and SSB quality sub-indices have an insignificant association with risk. The findings were substantially similar when we used portfolio risk as an alternative measure of risk-taking and FGLS and OLS robust regression as alternative regression models. Consequently, the study recommends the need for relevant regulators to review the CG codes related to the board and these committees, as well as credit and risk management policies, to rejuvenate the effectiveness of RMC, AC, SSB and the overall CG practices in enhancing Islamic bank stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45050,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disclosure and Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate governance quality index and Islamic bank risk-taking\",\"authors\":\"Umar Habibu Umar, Muhamad Abduh, Mohd Hairul Azrin Besar\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41310-024-00260-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study used the board of directors, risk management committee (RMC), audit committee (AC) and Shari’a supervisory board (SSB) attributes and constructed a comprehensive corporate governance (CG) quality index and sub-indices to explore their influence on Islamic bank risk-taking. It used unbalanced panel data manually collected over 12 years (2010–2021) generated from the annual reports of a sample of 43 fully Shari'a-compliant Islamic banks operating in 15 different countries. Using the two-step system GMM estimator as a major regression, the findings indicate a significant positive relationship between the CG quality index and credit risk. Concerning sub-indices, board and AC quality sub-indices have a significant negative and positive association with credit risk. However, RMC and SSB quality sub-indices have an insignificant association with risk. The findings were substantially similar when we used portfolio risk as an alternative measure of risk-taking and FGLS and OLS robust regression as alternative regression models. Consequently, the study recommends the need for relevant regulators to review the CG codes related to the board and these committees, as well as credit and risk management policies, to rejuvenate the effectiveness of RMC, AC, SSB and the overall CG practices in enhancing Islamic bank stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Disclosure and Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Disclosure and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00260-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disclosure and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00260-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用董事会、风险管理委员会(RMC)、审计委员会(AC)和伊斯兰教法监事会(SSB)的属性,构建了一个全面的公司治理(CG)质量指数和子指数,以探讨它们对伊斯兰银行风险承担的影响。研究使用了从 15 个不同国家 43 家完全符合伊斯兰教法的伊斯兰银行的年度报告中手动收集的 12 年(2010-2021 年)非平衡面板数据。使用两步系统 GMM 估计法作为主要回归,结果表明 CG 质量指数与信贷风险之间存在显著的正相关关系。在子指数方面,董事会和 AC 质量子指数与信贷风险有显著的负相关和正相关。但 RMC 和 SSB 质量分指数与风险的关系不明显。当我们使用投资组合风险作为风险承担的替代衡量标准,以及使用 FGLS 和 OLS 稳健回归作为替代回归模型时,研究结果基本相似。因此,本研究建议相关监管机构有必要审查与董事会和这些委员会以及信贷和风险管理政策有关的企业管治守则,以重振风险管理委员会、咨询委员会、特别服务委员会和整体企业管治做法在增强伊斯兰银行稳定性方面的效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate governance quality index and Islamic bank risk-taking

This study used the board of directors, risk management committee (RMC), audit committee (AC) and Shari’a supervisory board (SSB) attributes and constructed a comprehensive corporate governance (CG) quality index and sub-indices to explore their influence on Islamic bank risk-taking. It used unbalanced panel data manually collected over 12 years (2010–2021) generated from the annual reports of a sample of 43 fully Shari'a-compliant Islamic banks operating in 15 different countries. Using the two-step system GMM estimator as a major regression, the findings indicate a significant positive relationship between the CG quality index and credit risk. Concerning sub-indices, board and AC quality sub-indices have a significant negative and positive association with credit risk. However, RMC and SSB quality sub-indices have an insignificant association with risk. The findings were substantially similar when we used portfolio risk as an alternative measure of risk-taking and FGLS and OLS robust regression as alternative regression models. Consequently, the study recommends the need for relevant regulators to review the CG codes related to the board and these committees, as well as credit and risk management policies, to rejuvenate the effectiveness of RMC, AC, SSB and the overall CG practices in enhancing Islamic bank stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disclosure and Governance publishes a balance between academic and practitioner perspectives in law and accounting on subjects related to corporate governance and disclosure. In its emphasis on practical issues, it is the only such journal in these fields. All rigorous and thoughtful conceptual papers are encouraged. To date, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance has published articles by a former general counsel and a former commissioner of the SEC, practitioners from Cleary Gottlieb, Skadden Arps, Wachtell Lipton, and Latham & Watkins as well as articles by academics from Harvard, Yale and NYU. The readership of the journal includes lawyers, accountants, and corporate directors and managers.
期刊最新文献
Examining the moderating role of senior management support in internal audit effectiveness: evidence from GCC region Impact of audit committee characteristics on risk disclosure: evidence from the banking sector of Pakistan Corporate finance signaling theory: an empirical analysis on the relationship between information asymmetry and the cost of equity capital Do ownership structure and board composition matter in firm performance? Regulatory influence in developing economy Corporate governance quality index and Islamic bank risk-taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1