肠道微生物群与外阴癌的因果关系:双样本双向孟德尔随机研究

Jiayan Chen, Peiyan Wang, Changji Xiao, Kalibinuer Kelaimu, Youjie Zeng, Feng Lyu, Xianshu Gao, Xiaomei Li, Jun Hu
{"title":"肠道微生物群与外阴癌的因果关系:双样本双向孟德尔随机研究","authors":"Jiayan Chen, Peiyan Wang, Changji Xiao, Kalibinuer Kelaimu, Youjie Zeng, Feng Lyu, Xianshu Gao, Xiaomei Li, Jun Hu","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.04.24311470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Recent investigations have proposed a link between gut microbiomes (GMs) and various cancers, yet the involvement of GMs in vulvar cancer (VC) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to discover the causal association between GMs and VC and identify the GM taxa with potential effect. Methods: Utilizing Mendelian randomization (MR) with genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, we analyzed 211 GM taxa and 190 VC cases with 167,189 healthy controls. The main analysis used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach, complemented by weighted median test, MR-PRESSO global test, and leave-one-out analysis. Results: Four nominally significant causal relationships were identified between GM taxa and VC. Class Betaproteobacteria [odds ratio (OR)=0.064, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.004-0.946, fp=0.045], order Burkholderiales [OR=0.074, 95% CI: 0.009-0.630, p=0.017], genus Intestinibacter [OR=0.073, 95% CI: 0.009-0.617, p=0.016], and genus RuminococcaceaeUCG003 [OR=0.162, 95% CI: 0.028-0.938, p=0.042] were linked to a lower chance of VC. The MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test confirmed the lack of horizontal pleiotropy (p>0.05), and leave-one-out analysis indicated result robustness. Conclusion: Our findings highlight four potential causal relationships and specific intestinal flora associated with decreased VC risk, offering insights for VC prevention and treatment.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal relationship between gut microbiota and vulvar cancer: a two-sample bi-directional Mendelian randomization study\",\"authors\":\"Jiayan Chen, Peiyan Wang, Changji Xiao, Kalibinuer Kelaimu, Youjie Zeng, Feng Lyu, Xianshu Gao, Xiaomei Li, Jun Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.04.24311470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Recent investigations have proposed a link between gut microbiomes (GMs) and various cancers, yet the involvement of GMs in vulvar cancer (VC) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to discover the causal association between GMs and VC and identify the GM taxa with potential effect. Methods: Utilizing Mendelian randomization (MR) with genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, we analyzed 211 GM taxa and 190 VC cases with 167,189 healthy controls. The main analysis used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach, complemented by weighted median test, MR-PRESSO global test, and leave-one-out analysis. Results: Four nominally significant causal relationships were identified between GM taxa and VC. Class Betaproteobacteria [odds ratio (OR)=0.064, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.004-0.946, fp=0.045], order Burkholderiales [OR=0.074, 95% CI: 0.009-0.630, p=0.017], genus Intestinibacter [OR=0.073, 95% CI: 0.009-0.617, p=0.016], and genus RuminococcaceaeUCG003 [OR=0.162, 95% CI: 0.028-0.938, p=0.042] were linked to a lower chance of VC. The MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test confirmed the lack of horizontal pleiotropy (p>0.05), and leave-one-out analysis indicated result robustness. Conclusion: Our findings highlight four potential causal relationships and specific intestinal flora associated with decreased VC risk, offering insights for VC prevention and treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.04.24311470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.04.24311470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近的研究提出了肠道微生物组(GMs)与各种癌症之间的联系,但GMs参与外阴癌(VC)的情况仍不清楚。本研究旨在发现肠道微生物组与外阴癌之间的因果关系,并确定具有潜在影响的肠道微生物组分类群。研究方法利用孟德尔随机化(MR)和全基因组关联研究(GWAS)汇总统计,我们分析了 211 个 GM 分类群和 190 个 VC 病例以及 167 189 个健康对照。主要分析采用了逆方差加权(IVW)方法,并辅以加权中位数检验、MR-PRESSO 全局检验和剔除分析。分析结果在基因改造类群与 VC 之间发现了四种名义上重要的因果关系。倍增菌类[几率比(OR)=0.064,95% 置信区间(CI):0.004-0.946,fp=0.045],伯克霍尔德氏菌目[OR=0.074,95% CI:0.009-0.630,p=0.017]、肠杆菌属[OR=0.073,95% CI:0.009-0.617,p=0.016]和反刍球菌属UCG003[OR=0.162,95% CI:0.028-0.938,p=0.042]与较低的 VC 机率相关。MR-Egger截距检验和MR-PRESSO全局检验证实了缺乏水平多效性(p>0.05),而leave-one-out分析表明了结果的稳健性。结论我们的研究结果强调了四种潜在的因果关系以及与降低 VC 风险相关的特定肠道菌群,为 VC 的预防和治疗提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal relationship between gut microbiota and vulvar cancer: a two-sample bi-directional Mendelian randomization study
Objective: Recent investigations have proposed a link between gut microbiomes (GMs) and various cancers, yet the involvement of GMs in vulvar cancer (VC) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to discover the causal association between GMs and VC and identify the GM taxa with potential effect. Methods: Utilizing Mendelian randomization (MR) with genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, we analyzed 211 GM taxa and 190 VC cases with 167,189 healthy controls. The main analysis used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach, complemented by weighted median test, MR-PRESSO global test, and leave-one-out analysis. Results: Four nominally significant causal relationships were identified between GM taxa and VC. Class Betaproteobacteria [odds ratio (OR)=0.064, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.004-0.946, fp=0.045], order Burkholderiales [OR=0.074, 95% CI: 0.009-0.630, p=0.017], genus Intestinibacter [OR=0.073, 95% CI: 0.009-0.617, p=0.016], and genus RuminococcaceaeUCG003 [OR=0.162, 95% CI: 0.028-0.938, p=0.042] were linked to a lower chance of VC. The MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test confirmed the lack of horizontal pleiotropy (p>0.05), and leave-one-out analysis indicated result robustness. Conclusion: Our findings highlight four potential causal relationships and specific intestinal flora associated with decreased VC risk, offering insights for VC prevention and treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contraceptive Outcomes of the Natural Cycles Birth Control App: A Study of Canadian Women Uptake of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Management of First Trimester Incomplete Abortion: A Cross-sectional study in central Uganda Impact and factors affecting unplanned out-of-hospital birth on newborns at University Hospital compared to in-hospital born newborns Effectiveness of the modified WHO labour care guide to detect prolonged and obstructed labour among women admitted at publicly funded facilities in rural Mbarara district, Southwestern Uganda: an ambispective cohort study ACVR2A Facilitates Trophoblast Cell Invasion through TCF7/c-JUN Pathway in Pre-eclampsia Progression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1