如何更好地吸引女运动员?青少年运动员健康和成绩教育的新方法

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001901
Megan Roche, Abby McIntyre, Carolyn Oliver, Kristin Sainani, Tatum Boyd, Austin Stoner, Emily Kraus
{"title":"如何更好地吸引女运动员?青少年运动员健康和成绩教育的新方法","authors":"Megan Roche, Abby McIntyre, Carolyn Oliver, Kristin Sainani, Tatum Boyd, Austin Stoner, Emily Kraus","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To evaluate the impact of a video series versus online pamphlets/blog posts on Female Athlete Triad (Triad) and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) knowledge in high school female runners. Methods Runners from 10 US schools were cluster-randomised into groups to either watch videos or read pamphlets on Triad/REDs, nutrition, menstrual cycle, bone health and mental health. Changes in knowledge and interest were assessed using generalised estimating equations. Results Forty-five runners were in the video intervention group (mean age=16.0) and 39 in the control (mean age=15.7). Both groups showed knowledge gains for all topics, except for mental health, where knowledge was already high. The intervention group’s knowledge increase (means=75.7 and 93.3) was not significantly higher than the control’s (means=77.9 and 93.6) (p=0.149). However, the intervention group had stronger scores on behavioural impact, information novelty and interest (means=3.77, 3.93 and 4.14) compared with the control’s (means=3.36, 3.48 and 3.52) (p≤0.05, p≤0.05 and p≤0.001). Conclusion Both videos and pamphlets improved knowledge of Triad/REDs and female athlete science, however videos had a greater influence on athletes’ engagement and behavioural intentions. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can we better engage female athletes? A novel approach to health and performance education in adolescent athletes\",\"authors\":\"Megan Roche, Abby McIntyre, Carolyn Oliver, Kristin Sainani, Tatum Boyd, Austin Stoner, Emily Kraus\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives To evaluate the impact of a video series versus online pamphlets/blog posts on Female Athlete Triad (Triad) and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) knowledge in high school female runners. Methods Runners from 10 US schools were cluster-randomised into groups to either watch videos or read pamphlets on Triad/REDs, nutrition, menstrual cycle, bone health and mental health. Changes in knowledge and interest were assessed using generalised estimating equations. Results Forty-five runners were in the video intervention group (mean age=16.0) and 39 in the control (mean age=15.7). Both groups showed knowledge gains for all topics, except for mental health, where knowledge was already high. The intervention group’s knowledge increase (means=75.7 and 93.3) was not significantly higher than the control’s (means=77.9 and 93.6) (p=0.149). However, the intervention group had stronger scores on behavioural impact, information novelty and interest (means=3.77, 3.93 and 4.14) compared with the control’s (means=3.36, 3.48 and 3.52) (p≤0.05, p≤0.05 and p≤0.001). Conclusion Both videos and pamphlets improved knowledge of Triad/REDs and female athlete science, however videos had a greater influence on athletes’ engagement and behavioural intentions. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估系列视频与在线小册子/博客文章对高中女生跑步者了解 "女运动员三要素"(Triad)和 "运动中能量相对缺乏"(REDs)知识的影响。方法 将来自美国 10 所学校的跑步运动员随机分组,观看视频或阅读有关三要素/REDs、营养、月经周期、骨骼健康和心理健康的小册子。采用广义估计方程对知识和兴趣的变化进行评估。结果 45 名跑步者参加了视频干预组(平均年龄为 16.0 岁),39 名参加了对照组(平均年龄为 15.7 岁)。除心理健康的知识水平已经很高外,两组选手对所有主题的知识水平都有所提高。干预组的知识增长(平均值=75.7 和 93.3)并没有明显高于对照组(平均值=77.9 和 93.6)(P=0.149)。然而,干预组在行为影响、信息新颖性和兴趣方面的得分(平均值=3.77、3.93 和 4.14)高于对照组(平均值=3.36、3.48 和 3.52)(p≤0.05、p≤0.05 和 p≤0.001)。结论 视频和小册子都提高了运动员对 Triad/REDs 和女运动员科学的认识,但视频对运动员的参与度和行为意向的影响更大。与该研究相关的所有数据均包含在文章中或作为补充信息上传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How can we better engage female athletes? A novel approach to health and performance education in adolescent athletes
Objectives To evaluate the impact of a video series versus online pamphlets/blog posts on Female Athlete Triad (Triad) and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) knowledge in high school female runners. Methods Runners from 10 US schools were cluster-randomised into groups to either watch videos or read pamphlets on Triad/REDs, nutrition, menstrual cycle, bone health and mental health. Changes in knowledge and interest were assessed using generalised estimating equations. Results Forty-five runners were in the video intervention group (mean age=16.0) and 39 in the control (mean age=15.7). Both groups showed knowledge gains for all topics, except for mental health, where knowledge was already high. The intervention group’s knowledge increase (means=75.7 and 93.3) was not significantly higher than the control’s (means=77.9 and 93.6) (p=0.149). However, the intervention group had stronger scores on behavioural impact, information novelty and interest (means=3.77, 3.93 and 4.14) compared with the control’s (means=3.36, 3.48 and 3.52) (p≤0.05, p≤0.05 and p≤0.001). Conclusion Both videos and pamphlets improved knowledge of Triad/REDs and female athlete science, however videos had a greater influence on athletes’ engagement and behavioural intentions. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of football injuries among academy players in Ghana. Cardiovascular effects of exercise training in pregnant people with a high body mass index: secondary results from a randomised controlled trial (ETIP). Multimodal intervention based on physical exercise, mindfulness, behaviour change and education to improve pain and health in patients with chronic primary low back pain: a study protocol of the HEALTHYBACK randomised controlled trial. TENDINopathy Severity Assessment-Achilles: a study protocol for cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties patient-reported outcome instrument in Persian athletes with Achilles tendinopathy. Original salivary sex hormone data of naturally menstruating athletes and hormonal contraceptive users.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1