{"title":"寿命问题:学术图书馆中纪录片的持续价值","authors":"Susannah Benedetti, Jeanne G. Cross","doi":"10.1108/cc-12-2023-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to examine the use of physical and streaming documentary film collections available in a mid-sized academic library, specifically relating to the length of time that documentary films may remain relevant for curricular use.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors defined documentary film for the purposes of the study and created data sets of our non-fiction film holdings. They weeded out titles that could not be defined as documentaries and ran use reports for streaming and physical collections. They also used Power BI to visualize the data more clearly.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors found that documentary films could remain useful for 25 years, with certain films remaining relevant even longer.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>These findings indicate that purchasing or licensing streaming documentary film packages provides value, including older content. In addition, the authors will continue to make purchases of physical DVD or Blu Ray content when necessary and keep these collections up to 30 years before heavily weeding them.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":41029,"journal":{"name":"Collection and Curation","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A question of longevity: ongoing value of documentary film in an academic library\",\"authors\":\"Susannah Benedetti, Jeanne G. Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cc-12-2023-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to examine the use of physical and streaming documentary film collections available in a mid-sized academic library, specifically relating to the length of time that documentary films may remain relevant for curricular use.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The authors defined documentary film for the purposes of the study and created data sets of our non-fiction film holdings. They weeded out titles that could not be defined as documentaries and ran use reports for streaming and physical collections. They also used Power BI to visualize the data more clearly.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The authors found that documentary films could remain useful for 25 years, with certain films remaining relevant even longer.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>These findings indicate that purchasing or licensing streaming documentary film packages provides value, including older content. In addition, the authors will continue to make purchases of physical DVD or Blu Ray content when necessary and keep these collections up to 30 years before heavily weeding them.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":41029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collection and Curation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collection and Curation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-12-2023-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection and Curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-12-2023-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在研究一家中等规模学术图书馆的实体和流媒体纪录片馆藏的使用情况,特别是纪录片在课程使用中的相关时间长度。他们剔除了不能定义为纪录片的片目,并运行了流媒体和实体收藏的使用报告。研究结果作者发现,纪录片在 25 年内仍然有用,某些影片的相关性甚至更长。原创性/价值这些研究结果表明,购买或授权流媒体纪录片套餐具有价值,包括较老的内容。此外,作者将继续在必要时购买实体 DVD 或蓝光内容,并在大量清除之前将这些收藏保留 30 年。
A question of longevity: ongoing value of documentary film in an academic library
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the use of physical and streaming documentary film collections available in a mid-sized academic library, specifically relating to the length of time that documentary films may remain relevant for curricular use.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors defined documentary film for the purposes of the study and created data sets of our non-fiction film holdings. They weeded out titles that could not be defined as documentaries and ran use reports for streaming and physical collections. They also used Power BI to visualize the data more clearly.
Findings
The authors found that documentary films could remain useful for 25 years, with certain films remaining relevant even longer.
Originality/value
These findings indicate that purchasing or licensing streaming documentary film packages provides value, including older content. In addition, the authors will continue to make purchases of physical DVD or Blu Ray content when necessary and keep these collections up to 30 years before heavily weeding them.