财务会计课程的学习成绩:COVID19在多样性、公平、包容和归属感(DEIB)框架内的影响

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100915
Oksana Kim, Robert E. Rosacker
{"title":"财务会计课程的学习成绩:COVID19在多样性、公平、包容和归属感(DEIB)框架内的影响","authors":"Oksana Kim,&nbsp;Robert E. Rosacker","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines student performance in the principles of financial accounting course at a comprehensive, AACSB accredited, midwestern University to assess several issues raised and being directly addressed through a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) initiative. It is framed within a high-quality, archival dataset constructed by the University to support data analytic, evidence-based decisions, to inform student initiatives aimed at closing educational opportunity gaps. The examined course is the only business course supported by a supplemental instruction program that targets traditionally difficult University courses (failure rates exceeding 25%). Our empirical analysis is conducted within the context of pre- and post-COVID19 timeframes with this disruption deemed as a moderating factor. Final course grades, gender identification, academic major, race, and international student status were examined to investigate grade performance differences, if any, between the two timeframes, while concentrating on distinct DEIB population demographics. We find that students of color and female students underperformed in the core accounting course, which impedes their progress towards the chosen major. No evidence was found for an academic achievement difference based on the international student status. In addition, first-generation students’ performance does not differ from that of their peers, despite ongoing concerns of lack of confidence and resources this cohort possesses. Last, female students’ performance improved post- pandemic, while other minority groups did not experience any changes in course success rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic achievement in the financial accounting course: COVID19 impact within the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB) framework\",\"authors\":\"Oksana Kim,&nbsp;Robert E. Rosacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines student performance in the principles of financial accounting course at a comprehensive, AACSB accredited, midwestern University to assess several issues raised and being directly addressed through a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) initiative. It is framed within a high-quality, archival dataset constructed by the University to support data analytic, evidence-based decisions, to inform student initiatives aimed at closing educational opportunity gaps. The examined course is the only business course supported by a supplemental instruction program that targets traditionally difficult University courses (failure rates exceeding 25%). Our empirical analysis is conducted within the context of pre- and post-COVID19 timeframes with this disruption deemed as a moderating factor. Final course grades, gender identification, academic major, race, and international student status were examined to investigate grade performance differences, if any, between the two timeframes, while concentrating on distinct DEIB population demographics. We find that students of color and female students underperformed in the core accounting course, which impedes their progress towards the chosen major. No evidence was found for an academic achievement difference based on the international student status. In addition, first-generation students’ performance does not differ from that of their peers, despite ongoing concerns of lack of confidence and resources this cohort possesses. Last, female students’ performance improved post- pandemic, while other minority groups did not experience any changes in course success rates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了美国中西部一所获得 AACSB 认证的综合性大学的学生在财务会计原理课程中的表现,以评估通过 "多样性、平等、包容和归属感"(DEIB)计划提出并直接解决的几个问题。该课程是在大学构建的高质量档案数据集的框架内进行的,以支持数据分析和循证决策,为旨在缩小教育机会差距的学生活动提供信息。所研究的课程是唯一一门由补充教学计划支持的商科课程,该计划针对的是大学传统上的难点课程(不及格率超过 25%)。我们的实证分析是在 "COVID19 "之前和之后的时间范围内进行的,这种干扰被视为一种调节因素。我们对最终课程成绩、性别认同、学术专业、种族和国际学生身份进行了研究,以调查两个时间框架之间的成绩差异(如果有的话),同时关注不同的 DEIB 人口统计数据。我们发现,有色人种学生和女生在核心会计课程中表现不佳,这阻碍了他们向所选专业的发展。没有证据表明国际学生的学业成绩存在差异。此外,第一代学生的成绩与同龄人并无差异,尽管他们一直担心缺乏自信和资源。最后,女学生的成绩在大流行病后有所提高,而其他少数群体的课程成功率没有任何变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic achievement in the financial accounting course: COVID19 impact within the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB) framework

This study examines student performance in the principles of financial accounting course at a comprehensive, AACSB accredited, midwestern University to assess several issues raised and being directly addressed through a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) initiative. It is framed within a high-quality, archival dataset constructed by the University to support data analytic, evidence-based decisions, to inform student initiatives aimed at closing educational opportunity gaps. The examined course is the only business course supported by a supplemental instruction program that targets traditionally difficult University courses (failure rates exceeding 25%). Our empirical analysis is conducted within the context of pre- and post-COVID19 timeframes with this disruption deemed as a moderating factor. Final course grades, gender identification, academic major, race, and international student status were examined to investigate grade performance differences, if any, between the two timeframes, while concentrating on distinct DEIB population demographics. We find that students of color and female students underperformed in the core accounting course, which impedes their progress towards the chosen major. No evidence was found for an academic achievement difference based on the international student status. In addition, first-generation students’ performance does not differ from that of their peers, despite ongoing concerns of lack of confidence and resources this cohort possesses. Last, female students’ performance improved post- pandemic, while other minority groups did not experience any changes in course success rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1