Janine Hoffmann, Theresa M. Schütze, Annika Kolodziejczyk, Annekathrin Kränkel, Susanne Reinhardt, Razvan P. Derihaci, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Haruhiko Koseki, Mareike Albert
{"title":"规范和非规范 PRC1 对神经干细胞命运的调控具有不同作用","authors":"Janine Hoffmann, Theresa M. Schütze, Annika Kolodziejczyk, Annekathrin Kränkel, Susanne Reinhardt, Razvan P. Derihaci, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Haruhiko Koseki, Mareike Albert","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.07.606990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neocortex development is characterized by sequential phases of neural progenitor cell (NPC) expansion, neurogenesis and gliogenesis. Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms are known to play important roles in regulating the lineage potential of NPCs during development. The composition of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is highly diverse in mammals and was hypothesized to contribute to context-specific regulation of cell fate. Here, we have performed side-by-side comparison of the role of canonical PRC1.2/1.4 and non-canonical PRC1.3/1.5, all of which are expressed in the developing neocortex, in NSC proliferation and differentiation. We found that the deletion of <em>Pcgf2/4</em> in NSCs led to a strong reduction in proliferation and to altered lineage fate, both during the neurogenic and gliogenic phase, whereas <em>Pcgf3/5</em> played a minor role. Mechanistically, genes encoding stem cell and neurogenic factors were bound by PRC1 and differentially expressed upon <em>Pcgf2/4</em> deletion. Thus, rather than different PRC1 sub-complexes contributing to different phases of neural development, we found that canonical PRC1 played a more significant role in NSC regulation during proliferative, neurogenic and gliogenic phases compared to non-canonical PRC1.","PeriodicalId":501269,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canonical and non-canonical PRC1 differentially contribute to the regulation of neural stem cell fate\",\"authors\":\"Janine Hoffmann, Theresa M. Schütze, Annika Kolodziejczyk, Annekathrin Kränkel, Susanne Reinhardt, Razvan P. Derihaci, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Haruhiko Koseki, Mareike Albert\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.07.606990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neocortex development is characterized by sequential phases of neural progenitor cell (NPC) expansion, neurogenesis and gliogenesis. Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms are known to play important roles in regulating the lineage potential of NPCs during development. The composition of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is highly diverse in mammals and was hypothesized to contribute to context-specific regulation of cell fate. Here, we have performed side-by-side comparison of the role of canonical PRC1.2/1.4 and non-canonical PRC1.3/1.5, all of which are expressed in the developing neocortex, in NSC proliferation and differentiation. We found that the deletion of <em>Pcgf2/4</em> in NSCs led to a strong reduction in proliferation and to altered lineage fate, both during the neurogenic and gliogenic phase, whereas <em>Pcgf3/5</em> played a minor role. Mechanistically, genes encoding stem cell and neurogenic factors were bound by PRC1 and differentially expressed upon <em>Pcgf2/4</em> deletion. Thus, rather than different PRC1 sub-complexes contributing to different phases of neural development, we found that canonical PRC1 played a more significant role in NSC regulation during proliferative, neurogenic and gliogenic phases compared to non-canonical PRC1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.07.606990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.07.606990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Canonical and non-canonical PRC1 differentially contribute to the regulation of neural stem cell fate
Neocortex development is characterized by sequential phases of neural progenitor cell (NPC) expansion, neurogenesis and gliogenesis. Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms are known to play important roles in regulating the lineage potential of NPCs during development. The composition of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is highly diverse in mammals and was hypothesized to contribute to context-specific regulation of cell fate. Here, we have performed side-by-side comparison of the role of canonical PRC1.2/1.4 and non-canonical PRC1.3/1.5, all of which are expressed in the developing neocortex, in NSC proliferation and differentiation. We found that the deletion of Pcgf2/4 in NSCs led to a strong reduction in proliferation and to altered lineage fate, both during the neurogenic and gliogenic phase, whereas Pcgf3/5 played a minor role. Mechanistically, genes encoding stem cell and neurogenic factors were bound by PRC1 and differentially expressed upon Pcgf2/4 deletion. Thus, rather than different PRC1 sub-complexes contributing to different phases of neural development, we found that canonical PRC1 played a more significant role in NSC regulation during proliferative, neurogenic and gliogenic phases compared to non-canonical PRC1.