利用 CeTEAM 探究 PARP 抑制剂选择性和药理学的细胞内决定因素

Maria J. Pires, Alen Lovric, Emanuele Fabbrizi, Dante Rotili, Mikael Altun, Nicholas C.K. Valerie
{"title":"利用 CeTEAM 探究 PARP 抑制剂选择性和药理学的细胞内决定因素","authors":"Maria J. Pires, Alen Lovric, Emanuele Fabbrizi, Dante Rotili, Mikael Altun, Nicholas C.K. Valerie","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.09.607390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PARP inhibitors (PARPi) predominantly targeting PARP1 and PARP2 have revolutionized cancer therapy by exploiting synthetic lethality and selectively killing cancer cells with defective DNA repair. However, achieving PARP1 or PARP2-selective inhibitors is difficult due to their close structural homology. Selectivity profiling is typically done with purified proteins, but these lack the complexity of intracellular environments and could therefore be inaccurate. The cellular target engagement by accumulation of mutant (CeTEAM) method provides insights into drug binding in cellulo by means of conditionally stabilized biosensors, thus offering a dynamic view of pharmacological events in living cells. Here, we duplex PARP1 L713F-GFP and PARP2 L269A-mCherry biosensors to systematically characterize potential PARPi binding and cell cycle alterations at the single cell level. Our results reveal that most PARPi are generally equipotent for both PARPs or have slight biases only towards PARP1, not PARP2. AZD5305, a reported PARP1-selective inhibitor, was the exception and appears ~1600-fold more potent towards PARP1. Surprisingly, niraparib was >10-fold more selective for PARP1, despite reported equipotent biochemical activity. Meanwhile, the next generation PARPi, senaparib, was a potent PARP1/2 binder and DNA trapper. We also assessed the effect of the PARP1/2 active site component, HPF1, on intracellular PARPi binding and see that HPF1 depletion elicits slight deviations in apparent binding potency, while contributing additively to PARP-DNA trapping. These results highlight that multiplexing CeTEAM biosensors and layered genetic perturbations can systematically profile determinants of intracellular drug selectivity. Furthermore, the PARP1/2 CeTEAM platform should facilitate the discovery of selective PARPi for better targeted therapies.","PeriodicalId":501147,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Biochemistry","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probing intracellular determinants of PARP inhibitor selectivity and pharmacology with CeTEAM\",\"authors\":\"Maria J. Pires, Alen Lovric, Emanuele Fabbrizi, Dante Rotili, Mikael Altun, Nicholas C.K. Valerie\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.09.607390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PARP inhibitors (PARPi) predominantly targeting PARP1 and PARP2 have revolutionized cancer therapy by exploiting synthetic lethality and selectively killing cancer cells with defective DNA repair. However, achieving PARP1 or PARP2-selective inhibitors is difficult due to their close structural homology. Selectivity profiling is typically done with purified proteins, but these lack the complexity of intracellular environments and could therefore be inaccurate. The cellular target engagement by accumulation of mutant (CeTEAM) method provides insights into drug binding in cellulo by means of conditionally stabilized biosensors, thus offering a dynamic view of pharmacological events in living cells. Here, we duplex PARP1 L713F-GFP and PARP2 L269A-mCherry biosensors to systematically characterize potential PARPi binding and cell cycle alterations at the single cell level. Our results reveal that most PARPi are generally equipotent for both PARPs or have slight biases only towards PARP1, not PARP2. AZD5305, a reported PARP1-selective inhibitor, was the exception and appears ~1600-fold more potent towards PARP1. Surprisingly, niraparib was >10-fold more selective for PARP1, despite reported equipotent biochemical activity. Meanwhile, the next generation PARPi, senaparib, was a potent PARP1/2 binder and DNA trapper. We also assessed the effect of the PARP1/2 active site component, HPF1, on intracellular PARPi binding and see that HPF1 depletion elicits slight deviations in apparent binding potency, while contributing additively to PARP-DNA trapping. These results highlight that multiplexing CeTEAM biosensors and layered genetic perturbations can systematically profile determinants of intracellular drug selectivity. Furthermore, the PARP1/2 CeTEAM platform should facilitate the discovery of selective PARPi for better targeted therapies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.09.607390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.09.607390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以 PARP1 和 PARP2 为主要靶点的 PARP 抑制剂(PARPi)利用合成致死性,选择性地杀死存在 DNA 修复缺陷的癌细胞,为癌症治疗带来了革命性的变化。然而,由于 PARP1 或 PARP2 的结构同源性很高,因此很难实现 PARP1 或 PARP2 选择性抑制剂。选择性分析通常使用纯化的蛋白质,但这些蛋白质缺乏细胞内环境的复杂性,因此可能不准确。通过突变体积累的细胞靶标参与(CeTEAM)方法可通过条件稳定的生物传感器深入了解细胞内的药物结合情况,从而提供活细胞内药理事件的动态视图。在这里,我们双工 PARP1 L713F-GFP 和 PARP2 L269A-mCherry 生物传感器,在单细胞水平上系统地描述了潜在的 PARPi 结合和细胞周期改变。我们的研究结果表明,大多数 PARPi 通常对两种 PARP 都具有等效性,或者只对 PARP1 而非 PARP2 有轻微的偏向性。AZD5305 是一个例外,它是一种 PARP1 选择性抑制剂,对 PARP1 的作用比其他抑制剂强 1600 倍。令人惊讶的是,尼拉帕利对 PARP1 的选择性比 AZD5305 高出 10 倍,尽管据报道其生化活性相当。同时,新一代 PARPi senaparib 是一种强效的 PARP1/2 结合剂和 DNA 捕获剂。我们还评估了PARP1/2活性位点成分HPF1对细胞内PARPi结合的影响,发现HPF1缺失会导致表观结合效力出现轻微偏差,同时对PARP-DNA捕获有加成作用。这些结果突出表明,复用 CeTEAM 生物传感器和分层遗传扰动可以系统地分析细胞内药物选择性的决定因素。此外,PARP1/2 CeTEAM 平台还有助于发现具有选择性的 PARPi,从而更好地进行靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Probing intracellular determinants of PARP inhibitor selectivity and pharmacology with CeTEAM
PARP inhibitors (PARPi) predominantly targeting PARP1 and PARP2 have revolutionized cancer therapy by exploiting synthetic lethality and selectively killing cancer cells with defective DNA repair. However, achieving PARP1 or PARP2-selective inhibitors is difficult due to their close structural homology. Selectivity profiling is typically done with purified proteins, but these lack the complexity of intracellular environments and could therefore be inaccurate. The cellular target engagement by accumulation of mutant (CeTEAM) method provides insights into drug binding in cellulo by means of conditionally stabilized biosensors, thus offering a dynamic view of pharmacological events in living cells. Here, we duplex PARP1 L713F-GFP and PARP2 L269A-mCherry biosensors to systematically characterize potential PARPi binding and cell cycle alterations at the single cell level. Our results reveal that most PARPi are generally equipotent for both PARPs or have slight biases only towards PARP1, not PARP2. AZD5305, a reported PARP1-selective inhibitor, was the exception and appears ~1600-fold more potent towards PARP1. Surprisingly, niraparib was >10-fold more selective for PARP1, despite reported equipotent biochemical activity. Meanwhile, the next generation PARPi, senaparib, was a potent PARP1/2 binder and DNA trapper. We also assessed the effect of the PARP1/2 active site component, HPF1, on intracellular PARPi binding and see that HPF1 depletion elicits slight deviations in apparent binding potency, while contributing additively to PARP-DNA trapping. These results highlight that multiplexing CeTEAM biosensors and layered genetic perturbations can systematically profile determinants of intracellular drug selectivity. Furthermore, the PARP1/2 CeTEAM platform should facilitate the discovery of selective PARPi for better targeted therapies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytosolic CRISPR RNA for RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems Molecular activity mediates the composition and assembly of dissolved organic matter in lake sediments Structural insights into terminal arabinosylation biosynthesis of the mycobacterial cell wall arabinan Mechanistic studies of mycobacterial glycolipid biosynthesis by the mannosyltransferase PimE Affinity tag free purification of SARS-Cov-2 N protein and its crystal structure in complex with ssDNA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1