探索基于人工智能的腹腔镜手术术中图像导航系统对临床效果的影响:多中心随机对照试验方案

Daichi Kitaguchi, Nozomu Fuse, Masashi Wakabayashi, Norihito Kosugi, Yuto Ishikawa, Kazuyuki Hayashi, Hiro Hasegawa, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Masaaki Ito
{"title":"探索基于人工智能的腹腔镜手术术中图像导航系统对临床效果的影响:多中心随机对照试验方案","authors":"Daichi Kitaguchi, Nozomu Fuse, Masashi Wakabayashi, Norihito Kosugi, Yuto Ishikawa, Kazuyuki Hayashi, Hiro Hasegawa, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Masaaki Ito","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.05.24310603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background</strong> In the research field of artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery, there are many open questions that must be clarified. Well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to explore the positive clinical impacts by comparing the use and non-use of AI-based intraoperative image navigation. Therefore, herein, we propose the ImNavi trial, a multicenter RCT, to compare the use and non-use of an AI-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic surgery.&lt;br&gt;<strong>Methods</strong> The ImNavi trial is a Japanese multicenter RCT involving 1:1 randomization between the use and non-use of an AI-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The participating institutions will include three high-volume centers with sufficient laparoscopic colorectal surgery caseloads (&gt;100 cases/year), including one national cancer center and two university hospitals in Japan. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. Patients aged between 18 and 80 years scheduled to undergo laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection will be included in the study. The primary outcome is the time required for each target organ, including the ureter and autonomic nerves, to be recognized by the surgeon after its initial appearance on the monitor. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative target organ injuries, intraoperative complications, operation time, blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications within 30 days, postoperative male sexual dysfunction 1 month after surgery, surgeon′s confidence in recognizing each target organ, and the postoperative fatigue of the primary surgeon.&lt;br&gt;<strong>Discussion</strong> The impact of AI-based surgical applications on clinical outcomes beyond numerical expression will be explored from a variety of viewpoints while evaluating quantitative items, including intraoperative complications and operation time, as secondary endpoints. We expect that the findings of this RCT will contribute to advancing research in the domain of AI in surgery.","PeriodicalId":501051,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Surgery","volume":"171 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the impact of an artificial intelligence-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic surgery on clinical outcomes: A protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Daichi Kitaguchi, Nozomu Fuse, Masashi Wakabayashi, Norihito Kosugi, Yuto Ishikawa, Kazuyuki Hayashi, Hiro Hasegawa, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Masaaki Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.05.24310603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background</strong> In the research field of artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery, there are many open questions that must be clarified. Well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to explore the positive clinical impacts by comparing the use and non-use of AI-based intraoperative image navigation. Therefore, herein, we propose the ImNavi trial, a multicenter RCT, to compare the use and non-use of an AI-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic surgery.&lt;br&gt;<strong>Methods</strong> The ImNavi trial is a Japanese multicenter RCT involving 1:1 randomization between the use and non-use of an AI-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The participating institutions will include three high-volume centers with sufficient laparoscopic colorectal surgery caseloads (&gt;100 cases/year), including one national cancer center and two university hospitals in Japan. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. Patients aged between 18 and 80 years scheduled to undergo laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection will be included in the study. The primary outcome is the time required for each target organ, including the ureter and autonomic nerves, to be recognized by the surgeon after its initial appearance on the monitor. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative target organ injuries, intraoperative complications, operation time, blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications within 30 days, postoperative male sexual dysfunction 1 month after surgery, surgeon′s confidence in recognizing each target organ, and the postoperative fatigue of the primary surgeon.&lt;br&gt;<strong>Discussion</strong> The impact of AI-based surgical applications on clinical outcomes beyond numerical expression will be explored from a variety of viewpoints while evaluating quantitative items, including intraoperative complications and operation time, as secondary endpoints. We expect that the findings of this RCT will contribute to advancing research in the domain of AI in surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Surgery\",\"volume\":\"171 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24310603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24310603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 在人工智能(AI)在外科手术中的应用这一研究领域,有许多悬而未决的问题必须得到澄清。需要设计良好的随机对照试验(RCT),通过比较使用和不使用基于人工智能的术中图像导航来探索其积极的临床影响。因此,我们在此提出一项多中心 RCT 试验 ImNavi 试验,以比较在腹腔镜手术中使用和不使用基于人工智能的术中图像导航系统的情况。ImNavi 试验是一项日本多中心 RCT 试验,在腹腔镜结直肠手术中使用和不使用基于人工智能的术中图像导航系统之间进行 1:1 随机分配。参与研究的机构包括三家拥有足够腹腔镜结直肠手术量(100 例/年)的高容量中心,其中包括一家国立癌症中心和两家日本大学医院。所有患者都将获得书面知情同意。计划接受腹腔镜左侧结直肠切除术的患者年龄在 18 岁至 80 岁之间,将被纳入研究范围。主要结果是每个靶器官(包括输尿管和自主神经)在监视器上首次出现后被外科医生识别所需的时间。次要结果包括术中靶器官损伤、术中并发症、手术时间、失血量、术后住院时间、术后 30 天内并发症、术后 1 个月男性性功能障碍、外科医生识别每个靶器官的信心以及主刀医生的术后疲劳程度。<br>讨论 基于人工智能的外科应用对临床结果的影响将从不同角度进行探讨,而术中并发症和手术时间等定量项目则作为次要终点进行评估。我们希望本研究的结果将有助于推动人工智能在外科领域的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the impact of an artificial intelligence-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic surgery on clinical outcomes: A protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Background In the research field of artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery, there are many open questions that must be clarified. Well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to explore the positive clinical impacts by comparing the use and non-use of AI-based intraoperative image navigation. Therefore, herein, we propose the ImNavi trial, a multicenter RCT, to compare the use and non-use of an AI-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic surgery.<br>Methods The ImNavi trial is a Japanese multicenter RCT involving 1:1 randomization between the use and non-use of an AI-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The participating institutions will include three high-volume centers with sufficient laparoscopic colorectal surgery caseloads (>100 cases/year), including one national cancer center and two university hospitals in Japan. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. Patients aged between 18 and 80 years scheduled to undergo laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection will be included in the study. The primary outcome is the time required for each target organ, including the ureter and autonomic nerves, to be recognized by the surgeon after its initial appearance on the monitor. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative target organ injuries, intraoperative complications, operation time, blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications within 30 days, postoperative male sexual dysfunction 1 month after surgery, surgeon′s confidence in recognizing each target organ, and the postoperative fatigue of the primary surgeon.<br>Discussion The impact of AI-based surgical applications on clinical outcomes beyond numerical expression will be explored from a variety of viewpoints while evaluating quantitative items, including intraoperative complications and operation time, as secondary endpoints. We expect that the findings of this RCT will contribute to advancing research in the domain of AI in surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The VIPR-1 trial (Visualizing Ischemia in the Pancreatic Remnant) - Assessing the role of intraoperative indocyanine green perfusion of the transected pancreas in predicting postoperative pancreatic leaks: protocol for a prospective phase II trial. Insulin-dependence as a Predictor of Shortened Cancer-specific Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study from the United States Neuroendocrine Study Group Chyme Reinfusion Practices in the Neonatal Population Traumatic Amputations - A Nationwide Epidemiological Analysis of a developing country over 16 years Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1