Comments on "Non-local Nucleon Matrix Elements in the Rest Frame"

In a recent paper, "Non-local Nucleon Matrix Elements in the Rest Frame" (arXiv: 2407.16577), it was demonstrated that the next-to-leading order perturbative theory can describe, to a few percent accuracy, the lattice QCD static nucleon matrix elements of spatial correlators with separations up to 0.6~fm. We argue that perturbative QCD breaks down at such a distance scale after resumming the associated large logarithms, while the ansatz used in the analysis there did not account for resummation or the leading renormalon, both of which significantly affect the convergence of perturbation theory. Besides, we provide an explanation why the ansatz appears to describe the lattice data despite the breakdown of perturbation theory at large distances.