探讨CyberKnife机器人放射手术治疗三叉神经痛后的长期疗效

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100821
{"title":"探讨CyberKnife机器人放射手术治疗三叉神经痛后的长期疗效","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Radiosurgery has been extensively studied for its efficacy and safety in the management of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, among the plethora of relevant studies in the literature, only a restricted number have been conducted targeting an elongated trigeminal nerve segment with the CyberKnife radiosurgery (CKRS) system. Herein, we report long-term clinical outcomes of TN patients treated with CKRS.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Fifty patients treated with CKRS for medically refractory TN were analyzed. Pain response and sensory dysfunction post CKRS were assessed using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the maintenance of pain control and the risk of onset of facial numbness. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was employed for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictive factors among the collected variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median follow-up period was 63 months (range: 12–174 months). The median values of treated nerve volume, prescription dose, and integral dose were 59 mm<sup>3</sup>, 60 Gy and 3.9 mJ, respectively. Pain control (BNI I-III) was achieved in 37 patients (74%). Among them, the actuarial freedom from pain (FFP) rate was 82%, 78% and 74% at 24, 36 and beyond 48 months post-CKRS, respectively. A correlation of FFP rate with patient gender, treated nerve volume, and mean dose was revealed in multivariate analysis. Twenty-three patients (62%) reported onset of new or aggravation of pre-existing, facial numbness with twenty-one of them (57%) characterizing it as “mild facial numbness, not bothersome” (BNI-II) and two (5%) as “somewhat bothersome” (BNI-III). We did not encounter any case with very bothersome facial numbness (BNI-IV).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Long-term results of this work contribute to the body of evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of CKRS in the treatment of TN patients, in view of excellent pain control for an acceptable toxicity profile.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000983/pdfft?md5=007801ba618919f521e07bc1715f0930&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000983-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring long-term outcomes following CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Radiosurgery has been extensively studied for its efficacy and safety in the management of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, among the plethora of relevant studies in the literature, only a restricted number have been conducted targeting an elongated trigeminal nerve segment with the CyberKnife radiosurgery (CKRS) system. Herein, we report long-term clinical outcomes of TN patients treated with CKRS.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Fifty patients treated with CKRS for medically refractory TN were analyzed. Pain response and sensory dysfunction post CKRS were assessed using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the maintenance of pain control and the risk of onset of facial numbness. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was employed for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictive factors among the collected variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median follow-up period was 63 months (range: 12–174 months). The median values of treated nerve volume, prescription dose, and integral dose were 59 mm<sup>3</sup>, 60 Gy and 3.9 mJ, respectively. Pain control (BNI I-III) was achieved in 37 patients (74%). Among them, the actuarial freedom from pain (FFP) rate was 82%, 78% and 74% at 24, 36 and beyond 48 months post-CKRS, respectively. A correlation of FFP rate with patient gender, treated nerve volume, and mean dose was revealed in multivariate analysis. Twenty-three patients (62%) reported onset of new or aggravation of pre-existing, facial numbness with twenty-one of them (57%) characterizing it as “mild facial numbness, not bothersome” (BNI-II) and two (5%) as “somewhat bothersome” (BNI-III). We did not encounter any case with very bothersome facial numbness (BNI-IV).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Long-term results of this work contribute to the body of evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of CKRS in the treatment of TN patients, in view of excellent pain control for an acceptable toxicity profile.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000983/pdfft?md5=007801ba618919f521e07bc1715f0930&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000983-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000983\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的放射外科治疗三叉神经痛(TN)的有效性和安全性已得到广泛研究。然而,在大量的相关文献研究中,只有少数研究是针对三叉神经拉长段使用 CyberKnife 放射外科系统(CKRS)进行的。在此,我们报告了接受 CKRS 治疗的 TN 患者的长期临床疗效。采用巴罗神经学研究所(Barrow Neurological Institute,BNI)量表对 CKRS 治疗后的疼痛反应和感觉功能障碍进行评估。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析法评估疼痛控制的维持情况和面部麻木发生的风险。单变量和多变量分析均采用 Cox 比例危险回归模型,以确定收集的变量中的预测因素。治疗神经体积、处方剂量和积分剂量的中位值分别为 59 mm3、60 Gy 和 3.9 mJ。37名患者(74%)的疼痛得到控制(BNI I-III)。其中,CKRS 术后 24 个月、36 个月和 48 个月后的精算无痛率(FFP)分别为 82%、78% 和 74%。多变量分析显示,无痛率与患者性别、治疗神经体积和平均剂量相关。23名患者(62%)报告出现新的面部麻木或原有面部麻木加重,其中21名患者(57%)将其描述为 "轻度面部麻木,不令人烦恼"(BNI-II),2名患者(5%)将其描述为 "有点令人烦恼"(BNI-III)。结论这项研究的长期结果为支持 CKRS 治疗 TN 患者的安全性和有效性提供了大量证据,因为 CKRS 能在可接受的毒性条件下很好地控制疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring long-term outcomes following CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia

Background and purpose

Radiosurgery has been extensively studied for its efficacy and safety in the management of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, among the plethora of relevant studies in the literature, only a restricted number have been conducted targeting an elongated trigeminal nerve segment with the CyberKnife radiosurgery (CKRS) system. Herein, we report long-term clinical outcomes of TN patients treated with CKRS.

Materials and methods

Fifty patients treated with CKRS for medically refractory TN were analyzed. Pain response and sensory dysfunction post CKRS were assessed using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the maintenance of pain control and the risk of onset of facial numbness. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was employed for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictive factors among the collected variables.

Results

The median follow-up period was 63 months (range: 12–174 months). The median values of treated nerve volume, prescription dose, and integral dose were 59 mm3, 60 Gy and 3.9 mJ, respectively. Pain control (BNI I-III) was achieved in 37 patients (74%). Among them, the actuarial freedom from pain (FFP) rate was 82%, 78% and 74% at 24, 36 and beyond 48 months post-CKRS, respectively. A correlation of FFP rate with patient gender, treated nerve volume, and mean dose was revealed in multivariate analysis. Twenty-three patients (62%) reported onset of new or aggravation of pre-existing, facial numbness with twenty-one of them (57%) characterizing it as “mild facial numbness, not bothersome” (BNI-II) and two (5%) as “somewhat bothersome” (BNI-III). We did not encounter any case with very bothersome facial numbness (BNI-IV).

Conclusions

Long-term results of this work contribute to the body of evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of CKRS in the treatment of TN patients, in view of excellent pain control for an acceptable toxicity profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and safety of single-fraction sub-ablative radiotherapy with systemic therapy in colorectal cancer patients with ≤ 10 metastases: A multicenter pilot study (NCT05375708) Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how Reirradiation − still navigating uncharted waters? The impact of rectal spacers in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy Maximum disease diameter is associated with outcomes in stage II follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy alone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1