评估对管理课程进行的非时间密集型修改,以解决课程评价分数问题

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102170
Erin E. Miller , Shanna K. O'Connor , Jacob Ford , Emily Van Klompenburg , Wendy Jensen Bender
{"title":"评估对管理课程进行的非时间密集型修改,以解决课程评价分数问题","authors":"Erin E. Miller ,&nbsp;Shanna K. O'Connor ,&nbsp;Jacob Ford ,&nbsp;Emily Van Klompenburg ,&nbsp;Wendy Jensen Bender","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Student-completed course evaluations are often included in university faculty promotion and tenure packets but may not be the best metrics for student learning. This juxtaposition creates a challenge - the metric faculty first want to improve is student learning rather than student perception, but course changes improving student learning do not always result in higher course evaluation scores. Additionally, making course changes can be time consuming for faculty. The objective of this project was to assess the changes made to a course, the time spent making those changes, and the impact of the changes on course evaluation scores and student performance.</p></div><div><h3>Educational activity</h3><p>A single course focused on management with a business plan as the primary course project was revised in Fall 2023; the goal of revisions was to address poor course evaluation scores and negative student perceptions of the course in as little faculty time as possible while maintaining quality of student work. Primary changes centered around the business plan project and a shift in course communication. Evaluation of the changes occurred through mid-semester survey and discussion and end-of-semester survey for the 2023 cohort, and comparing course evaluations and student work products between the 2022 and 2023 cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Critical analysis of the educational activity</h3><p>Course evaluation scores were improved and student feedback was more positive for the revised Fall 2023 course. The implemented changes did not negatively affect student performance as quality of the business plan project was maintained across both semesters. Instructor transparency and responsiveness through the mid-semester survey and discussion may have positively influenced course evaluations scores. Overall, the course changes did not take a significant amount of faculty time, but the desired outcome of improving course evaluation scores was recognized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"16 12","pages":"Article 102170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of non-time-intensive changes to a management course to address course evaluation scores\",\"authors\":\"Erin E. Miller ,&nbsp;Shanna K. O'Connor ,&nbsp;Jacob Ford ,&nbsp;Emily Van Klompenburg ,&nbsp;Wendy Jensen Bender\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Student-completed course evaluations are often included in university faculty promotion and tenure packets but may not be the best metrics for student learning. This juxtaposition creates a challenge - the metric faculty first want to improve is student learning rather than student perception, but course changes improving student learning do not always result in higher course evaluation scores. Additionally, making course changes can be time consuming for faculty. The objective of this project was to assess the changes made to a course, the time spent making those changes, and the impact of the changes on course evaluation scores and student performance.</p></div><div><h3>Educational activity</h3><p>A single course focused on management with a business plan as the primary course project was revised in Fall 2023; the goal of revisions was to address poor course evaluation scores and negative student perceptions of the course in as little faculty time as possible while maintaining quality of student work. Primary changes centered around the business plan project and a shift in course communication. Evaluation of the changes occurred through mid-semester survey and discussion and end-of-semester survey for the 2023 cohort, and comparing course evaluations and student work products between the 2022 and 2023 cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Critical analysis of the educational activity</h3><p>Course evaluation scores were improved and student feedback was more positive for the revised Fall 2023 course. The implemented changes did not negatively affect student performance as quality of the business plan project was maintained across both semesters. Instructor transparency and responsiveness through the mid-semester survey and discussion may have positively influenced course evaluations scores. Overall, the course changes did not take a significant amount of faculty time, but the desired outcome of improving course evaluation scores was recognized.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 102170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景学生完成课程的评价经常被列入大学教师晋升和终身教职的资料包中,但却未必是衡量学生学习的最佳指标。这种并列关系造成了一种挑战--教师首先希望改进的指标是学生的学习,而不是学生的感知,但改进学生学习的课程变革并不总能带来更高的课程评价分数。此外,对教师来说,对课程进行修改也很耗时。教育活动 2023 年秋季,对一门以商业计划为主要课程项目的管理学课程进行了修订;修订的目的是在保证学生作业质量的前提下,用尽可能少的教师时间来解决课程评价分数低和学生对课程的负面看法等问题。主要变化围绕商业计划项目和课程交流的转变。通过对 2023 届学生的期中调查和讨论、期末调查,以及比较 2022 届和 2023 届学生的课程评价和学生作业产品,对这些变化进行了评估。由于商业计划项目的质量在两个学期都得到了保持,因此所实施的改革并没有对学生的成绩产生负面影响。通过学期中的调查和讨论,教师的透明度和回应能力可能对课程评价分数产生了积极影响。总体而言,课程改革没有花费教师大量的时间,但提高课程评价分数的预期结果得到了认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of non-time-intensive changes to a management course to address course evaluation scores

Background

Student-completed course evaluations are often included in university faculty promotion and tenure packets but may not be the best metrics for student learning. This juxtaposition creates a challenge - the metric faculty first want to improve is student learning rather than student perception, but course changes improving student learning do not always result in higher course evaluation scores. Additionally, making course changes can be time consuming for faculty. The objective of this project was to assess the changes made to a course, the time spent making those changes, and the impact of the changes on course evaluation scores and student performance.

Educational activity

A single course focused on management with a business plan as the primary course project was revised in Fall 2023; the goal of revisions was to address poor course evaluation scores and negative student perceptions of the course in as little faculty time as possible while maintaining quality of student work. Primary changes centered around the business plan project and a shift in course communication. Evaluation of the changes occurred through mid-semester survey and discussion and end-of-semester survey for the 2023 cohort, and comparing course evaluations and student work products between the 2022 and 2023 cohorts.

Critical analysis of the educational activity

Course evaluation scores were improved and student feedback was more positive for the revised Fall 2023 course. The implemented changes did not negatively affect student performance as quality of the business plan project was maintained across both semesters. Instructor transparency and responsiveness through the mid-semester survey and discussion may have positively influenced course evaluations scores. Overall, the course changes did not take a significant amount of faculty time, but the desired outcome of improving course evaluation scores was recognized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preceptor perspectives on disability-related accommodations in pharmacy experiential education Practice transformation starts in the classroom: Mapping practice change learning in a PharmD program Keeping pace in the age of innovation: The perspective of Dutch pharmaceutical science students on the position of machine learning training in an undergraduate curriculum Live and learn: Utilizing MyDispense to increase student knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1