养殖的金苹果螺(腹足纲;瓣鳃目;金芒果螺科)的化学成分和营养价值比较

IF 7.2 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Future Foods Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100422
{"title":"养殖的金苹果螺(腹足纲;瓣鳃目;金芒果螺科)的化学成分和营养价值比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The comparison of the Sanim (SN) and Srithong (ST) varieties of the farmed apple snail <em>Pomacea canaliculata</em> as an alternative protein source has shown that ST contained more hydroxyproline and possessed a greater firmness than SN. Nevertheless, both varieties yielded similar protein contents of 20.90–23.07 % and exhibited similar texture, color, cooking yields and cooking losses after cooking. Good palatability with high liking score was obtained from both snail meat samples, particularly color, texture, and overall attributes. Snail meats possessed good nutritive value with an amount of protein and low fat content, whereas SN contained higher protein and total energy(<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Other nutritionally useful chemicals (such as calcium, sodium, iron, vitamins B1 and B2) are present. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) results discovered that myosin heavy chain, paramyosin, and actin were the prevalent protein components. Differences in nitrogen content distribution were observed between SN and ST, in which alkaline-soluble protein was the major fraction. Amino acid composition and fatty acid content varied regarding snail varieties with a large amount of essential amino acids and good source of MUFA and PUFA. Therefore, both farmed SN and ST snails could be an effective alternative protein source with a significant amount of nutritive value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34474,"journal":{"name":"Future Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683352400128X/pdfft?md5=2dc53102744384c855a718cf1a8bc832&pid=1-s2.0-S266683352400128X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the chemical compositions and nutrient values of the sanim and srithong varieties of the farmed golden apple snails (Gastropoda; Ampullariidae; Pomacea canaliculata)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The comparison of the Sanim (SN) and Srithong (ST) varieties of the farmed apple snail <em>Pomacea canaliculata</em> as an alternative protein source has shown that ST contained more hydroxyproline and possessed a greater firmness than SN. Nevertheless, both varieties yielded similar protein contents of 20.90–23.07 % and exhibited similar texture, color, cooking yields and cooking losses after cooking. Good palatability with high liking score was obtained from both snail meat samples, particularly color, texture, and overall attributes. Snail meats possessed good nutritive value with an amount of protein and low fat content, whereas SN contained higher protein and total energy(<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Other nutritionally useful chemicals (such as calcium, sodium, iron, vitamins B1 and B2) are present. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) results discovered that myosin heavy chain, paramyosin, and actin were the prevalent protein components. Differences in nitrogen content distribution were observed between SN and ST, in which alkaline-soluble protein was the major fraction. Amino acid composition and fatty acid content varied regarding snail varieties with a large amount of essential amino acids and good source of MUFA and PUFA. Therefore, both farmed SN and ST snails could be an effective alternative protein source with a significant amount of nutritive value.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Foods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683352400128X/pdfft?md5=2dc53102744384c855a718cf1a8bc832&pid=1-s2.0-S266683352400128X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683352400128X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266683352400128X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对作为替代蛋白质来源的养殖苹果螺 Pomacea canaliculata 的 Sanim(SN)和 Srithong(ST)品种进行比较后发现,ST 比 SN 含有更多的羟脯氨酸,且硬度更高。尽管如此,这两个品种的蛋白质含量(20.90%-23.07%)相似,质地、色泽、烹饪产量和烹饪后的损失也相似。两种蜗牛肉样品都具有良好的适口性,尤其是色泽、质地和整体属性方面,获得了较高的喜爱度。蜗牛肉具有良好的营养价值,蛋白质含量高,脂肪含量低,而 SN 含有较高的蛋白质和总能量(P < 0.05)。蜗牛肉中还含有其他有益的营养成分(如钙、钠、铁、维生素 B1 和 B2)。十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)结果显示,肌球蛋白重链、副肌球蛋白和肌动蛋白是主要的蛋白质成分。SN和ST的氮含量分布存在差异,其中碱溶性蛋白是主要成分。蜗牛品种的氨基酸组成和脂肪酸含量各不相同,但都含有大量的必需氨基酸和良好的 MUFA 和 PUFA 来源。因此,养殖的 SN 螺和 ST 螺均可作为一种有效的替代蛋白质来源,具有重要的营养价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the chemical compositions and nutrient values of the sanim and srithong varieties of the farmed golden apple snails (Gastropoda; Ampullariidae; Pomacea canaliculata)

The comparison of the Sanim (SN) and Srithong (ST) varieties of the farmed apple snail Pomacea canaliculata as an alternative protein source has shown that ST contained more hydroxyproline and possessed a greater firmness than SN. Nevertheless, both varieties yielded similar protein contents of 20.90–23.07 % and exhibited similar texture, color, cooking yields and cooking losses after cooking. Good palatability with high liking score was obtained from both snail meat samples, particularly color, texture, and overall attributes. Snail meats possessed good nutritive value with an amount of protein and low fat content, whereas SN contained higher protein and total energy(P < 0.05). Other nutritionally useful chemicals (such as calcium, sodium, iron, vitamins B1 and B2) are present. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) results discovered that myosin heavy chain, paramyosin, and actin were the prevalent protein components. Differences in nitrogen content distribution were observed between SN and ST, in which alkaline-soluble protein was the major fraction. Amino acid composition and fatty acid content varied regarding snail varieties with a large amount of essential amino acids and good source of MUFA and PUFA. Therefore, both farmed SN and ST snails could be an effective alternative protein source with a significant amount of nutritive value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Foods
Future Foods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Properties of novel biodegradable film from gelatin capsule waste as influenced by various solvents and washing cycles Optimization of ultrasound assisted extraction of the Sea buckthorn leaves, characterization of the phenolic compounds, and determination of bioactive properties of the extracts Advancing microalgal applications: Process optimization and functional integration of lyophilized Spirulina biomass in formation of protein-enriched cheddar-type cheese Edible caterpillars (Gonimbrasia belina and Gynanisa maja) as emerging source of nutrients and bioactive compounds Novel strategies to control the biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the food industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1