超便携式自动体外除颤器的有效性:范围审查

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100739
G. Debaty , GD. Perkins , K.N. Dainty , T. Norii , T.M. Olasveengen , J.E. Bray , International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic Life Support Task Force
{"title":"超便携式自动体外除颤器的有效性:范围审查","authors":"G. Debaty ,&nbsp;GD. Perkins ,&nbsp;K.N. Dainty ,&nbsp;T. Norii ,&nbsp;T.M. Olasveengen ,&nbsp;J.E. Bray ,&nbsp;International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic Life Support Task Force","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ultraportable automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are a new generation of defibrillators that are small, lightweight, easy to carry on one’s person, and affordable for personal and home use. They offer the opportunity to increase AED availability in case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and therefore improve outcomes.</p><p>We aimed to review evidence supporting the potential effect on outcomes and the performance of these ultraportable AEDs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 2012 to July 4th, 2024 to identify any studies related to ultraportable AED. The population was adult and children with OHCA who were treated with an ultra-portable AED. All outcomes were accepted. We limited study designs to randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Data charting was done by the primary author using standardized data abstraction forms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search strategy identified 54 studies (Pubmed = 26, Embase = 28, with 19 duplicates). We included three articles in the final review. One study was a medico-economic simulation study including 600,000 simulated patients, one is the study protocol of cluster randomized trial of providing ultraportable AEDs to first responders and one is an abstract with preliminary results of this trial reporting 1805 community responders recruited, 903 allocated to ultraportable AED. No studies to date have reported patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review found no evidence of ultraportable AED device performance, clinical or safety outcomes. There is an urgent need for further research to determine the safety and effectiveness of ultraportable AEDs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001905/pdfft?md5=02953dda5bf318a5d526eea861513467&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001905-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of ultraportable automated external defibrillators: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"G. Debaty ,&nbsp;GD. Perkins ,&nbsp;K.N. Dainty ,&nbsp;T. Norii ,&nbsp;T.M. Olasveengen ,&nbsp;J.E. Bray ,&nbsp;International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Basic Life Support Task Force\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ultraportable automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are a new generation of defibrillators that are small, lightweight, easy to carry on one’s person, and affordable for personal and home use. They offer the opportunity to increase AED availability in case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and therefore improve outcomes.</p><p>We aimed to review evidence supporting the potential effect on outcomes and the performance of these ultraportable AEDs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 2012 to July 4th, 2024 to identify any studies related to ultraportable AED. The population was adult and children with OHCA who were treated with an ultra-portable AED. All outcomes were accepted. We limited study designs to randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Data charting was done by the primary author using standardized data abstraction forms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search strategy identified 54 studies (Pubmed = 26, Embase = 28, with 19 duplicates). We included three articles in the final review. One study was a medico-economic simulation study including 600,000 simulated patients, one is the study protocol of cluster randomized trial of providing ultraportable AEDs to first responders and one is an abstract with preliminary results of this trial reporting 1805 community responders recruited, 903 allocated to ultraportable AED. No studies to date have reported patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review found no evidence of ultraportable AED device performance, clinical or safety outcomes. There is an urgent need for further research to determine the safety and effectiveness of ultraportable AEDs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001905/pdfft?md5=02953dda5bf318a5d526eea861513467&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001905-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景超便携式自动体外除颤器(AED)是新一代除颤器,体积小、重量轻、便于随身携带、价格适中,适合个人和家庭使用。我们旨在回顾支持这些超便携式 AED 对预后和性能的潜在影响的证据。方法我们检索了 2012 年至 2024 年 7 月 4 日的 Ovid Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,以确定任何与超便携式 AED 相关的研究。研究对象为接受超便携式 AED 治疗的 OHCA 成人和儿童。所有结果均可接受。我们将研究设计限定为随机对照试验和非随机研究。数据图表由主要作者使用标准化的数据摘要表进行绘制。我们在最终审查中纳入了三篇文章。一篇是医学经济模拟研究,包括 60 万名模拟患者;一篇是为急救人员提供便携式 AED 的分组随机试验的研究方案;一篇是该试验初步结果的摘要,报告了招募的 1805 名社区急救人员中,903 人被分配使用便携式 AED。结论本综述未发现有关超便携式 AED 设备性能、临床或安全结果的证据。迫切需要进一步研究确定超便携式 AED 的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of ultraportable automated external defibrillators: A scoping review

Background

Ultraportable automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are a new generation of defibrillators that are small, lightweight, easy to carry on one’s person, and affordable for personal and home use. They offer the opportunity to increase AED availability in case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and therefore improve outcomes.

We aimed to review evidence supporting the potential effect on outcomes and the performance of these ultraportable AEDs.

Methods

We searched Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 2012 to July 4th, 2024 to identify any studies related to ultraportable AED. The population was adult and children with OHCA who were treated with an ultra-portable AED. All outcomes were accepted. We limited study designs to randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Data charting was done by the primary author using standardized data abstraction forms.

Results

The search strategy identified 54 studies (Pubmed = 26, Embase = 28, with 19 duplicates). We included three articles in the final review. One study was a medico-economic simulation study including 600,000 simulated patients, one is the study protocol of cluster randomized trial of providing ultraportable AEDs to first responders and one is an abstract with preliminary results of this trial reporting 1805 community responders recruited, 903 allocated to ultraportable AED. No studies to date have reported patient outcomes.

Conclusion

This review found no evidence of ultraportable AED device performance, clinical or safety outcomes. There is an urgent need for further research to determine the safety and effectiveness of ultraportable AEDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Cricothyroidotomy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study Does delivering chest compressions to patients who are not in cardiac arrest cause unintentional injury? A systematic review Why physicians use sodium bicarbonate during cardiac arrest: A cross-sectional survey study of adult and pediatric clinicians Application of multi-feature-based machine learning models to predict neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest Associations of long-term hyperoxemia, survival, and neurological outcomes in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients undergoing targeted temperature management: A retrospective observational analysis of the SAVE-J Ⅱ study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1