Gareth Hughes , Rania Khalil , Susan Wilkinson , Matthew K. O’Shea
{"title":"非流行环境中的肠热病:英国伯明翰大学医院 12 年来的病例回顾","authors":"Gareth Hughes , Rania Khalil , Susan Wilkinson , Matthew K. O’Shea","doi":"10.1016/j.clinpr.2024.100380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Enteric fever remains a common diagnosis in returned travellers to the UK, the majority of which require hospital admission. Increased resistance to antibiotics has complicated the management and rates of vaccine uptake remain unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective study of culture-confirmed cases of enteric fever from blood samples in patients admitted to University Hospitals Birmingham, UK, between January 2010 and June 2022 to assess antimicrobial susceptibility, treatment outcomes and vaccination uptake.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 108 patients were identified during the time period (<em>S.typhi</em> n = 57 [53 %]; <em>S.paratyphi</em> n = 51 [47 %]). Nearly all (93 % [100/108]) had returned from South Asia. There was no evidence of typhoid vaccination pre-travel for most patients (n = 96 [89 %]) in both groups. Over half of patients with S.<em>typhi</em> had microbiologically positive stool samples compared to just over 20 % of the <em>S. paratyphi</em> group (20/36 [55 %] vs 5/23 [22 %], p = 0.015). Three cases of ceftriaxone resistant enteric fever occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Enteric fever remains a frequent presentation to a non-endemic setting with close links to high-endemic regions such as South Asia. Vaccination uptake among local populations could be improved. Few cases of ceftriaxone-resistant enteric fever were seen which is a consideration for improved antimicrobial stewardship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33837,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infection in Practice","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590170224000402/pdfft?md5=2c1d4cec2b2ec0d49739c471f9c9cae2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590170224000402-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enteric fever in a non-endemic setting: Review of cases over a 12-year period at University hospitals Birmingham, UK\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Hughes , Rania Khalil , Susan Wilkinson , Matthew K. O’Shea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinpr.2024.100380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Enteric fever remains a common diagnosis in returned travellers to the UK, the majority of which require hospital admission. Increased resistance to antibiotics has complicated the management and rates of vaccine uptake remain unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective study of culture-confirmed cases of enteric fever from blood samples in patients admitted to University Hospitals Birmingham, UK, between January 2010 and June 2022 to assess antimicrobial susceptibility, treatment outcomes and vaccination uptake.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 108 patients were identified during the time period (<em>S.typhi</em> n = 57 [53 %]; <em>S.paratyphi</em> n = 51 [47 %]). Nearly all (93 % [100/108]) had returned from South Asia. There was no evidence of typhoid vaccination pre-travel for most patients (n = 96 [89 %]) in both groups. Over half of patients with S.<em>typhi</em> had microbiologically positive stool samples compared to just over 20 % of the <em>S. paratyphi</em> group (20/36 [55 %] vs 5/23 [22 %], p = 0.015). Three cases of ceftriaxone resistant enteric fever occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Enteric fever remains a frequent presentation to a non-endemic setting with close links to high-endemic regions such as South Asia. Vaccination uptake among local populations could be improved. Few cases of ceftriaxone-resistant enteric fever were seen which is a consideration for improved antimicrobial stewardship.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infection in Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590170224000402/pdfft?md5=2c1d4cec2b2ec0d49739c471f9c9cae2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590170224000402-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infection in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590170224000402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infection in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590170224000402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enteric fever in a non-endemic setting: Review of cases over a 12-year period at University hospitals Birmingham, UK
Objectives
Enteric fever remains a common diagnosis in returned travellers to the UK, the majority of which require hospital admission. Increased resistance to antibiotics has complicated the management and rates of vaccine uptake remain unclear.
Methods
We performed a retrospective study of culture-confirmed cases of enteric fever from blood samples in patients admitted to University Hospitals Birmingham, UK, between January 2010 and June 2022 to assess antimicrobial susceptibility, treatment outcomes and vaccination uptake.
Results
In total, 108 patients were identified during the time period (S.typhi n = 57 [53 %]; S.paratyphi n = 51 [47 %]). Nearly all (93 % [100/108]) had returned from South Asia. There was no evidence of typhoid vaccination pre-travel for most patients (n = 96 [89 %]) in both groups. Over half of patients with S.typhi had microbiologically positive stool samples compared to just over 20 % of the S. paratyphi group (20/36 [55 %] vs 5/23 [22 %], p = 0.015). Three cases of ceftriaxone resistant enteric fever occurred.
Conclusion
Enteric fever remains a frequent presentation to a non-endemic setting with close links to high-endemic regions such as South Asia. Vaccination uptake among local populations could be improved. Few cases of ceftriaxone-resistant enteric fever were seen which is a consideration for improved antimicrobial stewardship.