Sébastien Ars , Gabriela González Arismendi , Karlis Muehlenbachs , Douglas E.J. Worthy , Felix Vogel
{"title":"利用甲烷中的δ13C 原位测量数据调查加拿大西部沉积盆地的甲烷排放情况","authors":"Sébastien Ars , Gabriela González Arismendi , Karlis Muehlenbachs , Douglas E.J. Worthy , Felix Vogel","doi":"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During COP26, Canada joined the Global Methane Pledge aiming to reduce global methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions by 30% below 2020 levels by 2030. Rapid reduction of anthropogenic CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in the atmosphere is considered one of the most effective strategies to slow global warming in concert with carbon dioxide mitigation measures. In Canada, a large part of anthropogenic CH<sub>4</sub> emissions can be attributed to the oil and gas industry in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), which is the fourth largest reserve of fossil fuel in the world. Recent studies highlighted big discrepancies between CH<sub>4</sub> emissions reported in Canada's National Inventory and emissions estimated with approaches using atmospheric measurements for the oil and gas sector. Measuring the isotopic signature of CH<sub>4</sub> (δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>) at different atmospheric monitoring stations and comparing these measurements to detailed archives of δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> from oil and gas wells and associated CH<sub>4</sub> leaks in the WCSB could help better characterize the emissions from different CH<sub>4</sub> sources over the region. In this study, we compare two independent sets of data: (1) thousands of δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> of samples from oil and gas production wells and their associated leaks (surface casing vents and ground migration) collected across the WCSB, and (2) atmospheric mixing ratios of CH<sub>4</sub> and their δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> measured successively at three locations across this region between 2016 and 2020 combined with their atmospheric footprints modeled with HYSPLIT-STILT. We observed a gradient in the isotopic signatures of the oil and gas samples within the WCSB with δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> being more depleted in the Southeast than in the Northwest. The analysis of these samples showed that the isotopic signature of CH<sub>4</sub> emitted by the production of fossil fuel depends on the geological formations from which it is extracted. Also, CH<sub>4</sub> isotopic signatures vary more depending on the region where CH<sub>4</sub> comes from than on the type of fossil fuel extracted (natural gas, oil, heavy oil, shale gas). The atmospheric measurements showed a strong seasonality of δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> at one of the atmospheric monitoring sites with isotopic signatures associated with thermogenic sources in winter and isotopic signatures associated with a mix of biogenic and thermogenic sources in summer. Using the δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> archive database from oil and gas samples, we estimated that 28–39 % of the CH<sub>4</sub> emitted near this site in summer was coming from a biogenic source (most likely wetlands). Ultimately, atmospheric measurements collected during winter combined with their associated HYSPLIT-STILT footprints presented a spatial distribution of δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> over the WCSB comparable to the one observed in the archive database from the oil and gas sector, confirming that the oil and gas sector is the main source of CH<sub>4</sub> in this region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37150,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000534/pdfft?md5=96b0c7c85975c128592d746736664f2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2590162124000534-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using in situ measurements of δ13C in methane to investigate methane emissions from the western Canada sedimentary basin\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Ars , Gabriela González Arismendi , Karlis Muehlenbachs , Douglas E.J. Worthy , Felix Vogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>During COP26, Canada joined the Global Methane Pledge aiming to reduce global methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions by 30% below 2020 levels by 2030. Rapid reduction of anthropogenic CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in the atmosphere is considered one of the most effective strategies to slow global warming in concert with carbon dioxide mitigation measures. In Canada, a large part of anthropogenic CH<sub>4</sub> emissions can be attributed to the oil and gas industry in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), which is the fourth largest reserve of fossil fuel in the world. Recent studies highlighted big discrepancies between CH<sub>4</sub> emissions reported in Canada's National Inventory and emissions estimated with approaches using atmospheric measurements for the oil and gas sector. Measuring the isotopic signature of CH<sub>4</sub> (δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>) at different atmospheric monitoring stations and comparing these measurements to detailed archives of δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> from oil and gas wells and associated CH<sub>4</sub> leaks in the WCSB could help better characterize the emissions from different CH<sub>4</sub> sources over the region. In this study, we compare two independent sets of data: (1) thousands of δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> of samples from oil and gas production wells and their associated leaks (surface casing vents and ground migration) collected across the WCSB, and (2) atmospheric mixing ratios of CH<sub>4</sub> and their δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> measured successively at three locations across this region between 2016 and 2020 combined with their atmospheric footprints modeled with HYSPLIT-STILT. We observed a gradient in the isotopic signatures of the oil and gas samples within the WCSB with δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> being more depleted in the Southeast than in the Northwest. The analysis of these samples showed that the isotopic signature of CH<sub>4</sub> emitted by the production of fossil fuel depends on the geological formations from which it is extracted. Also, CH<sub>4</sub> isotopic signatures vary more depending on the region where CH<sub>4</sub> comes from than on the type of fossil fuel extracted (natural gas, oil, heavy oil, shale gas). The atmospheric measurements showed a strong seasonality of δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> at one of the atmospheric monitoring sites with isotopic signatures associated with thermogenic sources in winter and isotopic signatures associated with a mix of biogenic and thermogenic sources in summer. Using the δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> archive database from oil and gas samples, we estimated that 28–39 % of the CH<sub>4</sub> emitted near this site in summer was coming from a biogenic source (most likely wetlands). Ultimately, atmospheric measurements collected during winter combined with their associated HYSPLIT-STILT footprints presented a spatial distribution of δ<sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> over the WCSB comparable to the one observed in the archive database from the oil and gas sector, confirming that the oil and gas sector is the main source of CH<sub>4</sub> in this region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment: X\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000534/pdfft?md5=96b0c7c85975c128592d746736664f2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2590162124000534-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162124000534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using in situ measurements of δ13C in methane to investigate methane emissions from the western Canada sedimentary basin
During COP26, Canada joined the Global Methane Pledge aiming to reduce global methane (CH4) emissions by 30% below 2020 levels by 2030. Rapid reduction of anthropogenic CH4 emissions in the atmosphere is considered one of the most effective strategies to slow global warming in concert with carbon dioxide mitigation measures. In Canada, a large part of anthropogenic CH4 emissions can be attributed to the oil and gas industry in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), which is the fourth largest reserve of fossil fuel in the world. Recent studies highlighted big discrepancies between CH4 emissions reported in Canada's National Inventory and emissions estimated with approaches using atmospheric measurements for the oil and gas sector. Measuring the isotopic signature of CH4 (δ13CH4) at different atmospheric monitoring stations and comparing these measurements to detailed archives of δ13CH4 from oil and gas wells and associated CH4 leaks in the WCSB could help better characterize the emissions from different CH4 sources over the region. In this study, we compare two independent sets of data: (1) thousands of δ13CH4 of samples from oil and gas production wells and their associated leaks (surface casing vents and ground migration) collected across the WCSB, and (2) atmospheric mixing ratios of CH4 and their δ13CH4 measured successively at three locations across this region between 2016 and 2020 combined with their atmospheric footprints modeled with HYSPLIT-STILT. We observed a gradient in the isotopic signatures of the oil and gas samples within the WCSB with δ13CH4 being more depleted in the Southeast than in the Northwest. The analysis of these samples showed that the isotopic signature of CH4 emitted by the production of fossil fuel depends on the geological formations from which it is extracted. Also, CH4 isotopic signatures vary more depending on the region where CH4 comes from than on the type of fossil fuel extracted (natural gas, oil, heavy oil, shale gas). The atmospheric measurements showed a strong seasonality of δ13CH4 at one of the atmospheric monitoring sites with isotopic signatures associated with thermogenic sources in winter and isotopic signatures associated with a mix of biogenic and thermogenic sources in summer. Using the δ13CH4 archive database from oil and gas samples, we estimated that 28–39 % of the CH4 emitted near this site in summer was coming from a biogenic source (most likely wetlands). Ultimately, atmospheric measurements collected during winter combined with their associated HYSPLIT-STILT footprints presented a spatial distribution of δ13CH4 over the WCSB comparable to the one observed in the archive database from the oil and gas sector, confirming that the oil and gas sector is the main source of CH4 in this region.