儿童和母亲对游戏和学习的理解:跨越五种文化的对话

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101981
Lucía Bugallo , Sarah Jane Mukherjee , Nora Scheuer , Teresa Cremin , Virginia Montoro , Roberta Golinkoff , Marcia Preston , Doris Pui Wah Cheng , Jill Popp
{"title":"儿童和母亲对游戏和学习的理解:跨越五种文化的对话","authors":"Lucía Bugallo ,&nbsp;Sarah Jane Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Nora Scheuer ,&nbsp;Teresa Cremin ,&nbsp;Virginia Montoro ,&nbsp;Roberta Golinkoff ,&nbsp;Marcia Preston ,&nbsp;Doris Pui Wah Cheng ,&nbsp;Jill Popp","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Multiple tensions pervade the relationship between play and learning. Children's perceptions of this relationship are rarely analysed or placed alongside their parents' views. Literature has focused on predominant themes ignoring intra and inter-cultural variability.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We aimed to capture the different ways in which children and mothers in different cultural contexts conceive children's daily activities as instances of play and of learning.</p></div><div><h3>Samples</h3><p>Participants were 392 children (aged 5 and 7) and 192 mothers from Argentina, Denmark, China, England, United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Through a semi-structured interview, two closing questions were analysed: ‘Do you think it's possible to play and learn at the same time? Playing and learning, what's the difference between them?‘Lexicometry was applied to participants' responses. Qualitative analysis of local results was carried out to build a cross-cultural repertoire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A wide range of understandings emerged ranging from an impossibility of co-occurrence (characteristic of children) to a beneficial co-occurrence (characteristic of mothers). For many children play and learning constitute separate realms of activity and only among children is there evidence that learning is necessary to play. For all mothers, daily activities are opportunities for learning. Intra age-group heterogeneity varied across sites.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Learning in play was conceived by the children, but play in learning was restricted to academic learning. Hegemonic conceptions of education influenced participants' perceptions. The mothers expressed discrepancies between ‘ideal’ situations of co-occurrence between play and learning, and daily situations of not co-occurrence. A deep understanding of the synergies between these practices can unlock their mutual enrichment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101981"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children’s and mothers’ understanding of play and learning: Repertoires across five cultures\",\"authors\":\"Lucía Bugallo ,&nbsp;Sarah Jane Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Nora Scheuer ,&nbsp;Teresa Cremin ,&nbsp;Virginia Montoro ,&nbsp;Roberta Golinkoff ,&nbsp;Marcia Preston ,&nbsp;Doris Pui Wah Cheng ,&nbsp;Jill Popp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Multiple tensions pervade the relationship between play and learning. Children's perceptions of this relationship are rarely analysed or placed alongside their parents' views. Literature has focused on predominant themes ignoring intra and inter-cultural variability.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We aimed to capture the different ways in which children and mothers in different cultural contexts conceive children's daily activities as instances of play and of learning.</p></div><div><h3>Samples</h3><p>Participants were 392 children (aged 5 and 7) and 192 mothers from Argentina, Denmark, China, England, United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Through a semi-structured interview, two closing questions were analysed: ‘Do you think it's possible to play and learn at the same time? Playing and learning, what's the difference between them?‘Lexicometry was applied to participants' responses. Qualitative analysis of local results was carried out to build a cross-cultural repertoire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A wide range of understandings emerged ranging from an impossibility of co-occurrence (characteristic of children) to a beneficial co-occurrence (characteristic of mothers). For many children play and learning constitute separate realms of activity and only among children is there evidence that learning is necessary to play. For all mothers, daily activities are opportunities for learning. Intra age-group heterogeneity varied across sites.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Learning in play was conceived by the children, but play in learning was restricted to academic learning. Hegemonic conceptions of education influenced participants' perceptions. The mothers expressed discrepancies between ‘ideal’ situations of co-occurrence between play and learning, and daily situations of not co-occurrence. A deep understanding of the synergies between these practices can unlock their mutual enrichment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001087\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景游戏和学习之间的关系充斥着多重紧张关系。儿童对这种关系的看法很少得到分析,也很少与父母的看法放在一起。样本参与者是来自阿根廷、丹麦、中国、英国和美国的 392 名儿童(5 岁和 7 岁)和 192 名母亲。方法通过半结构式访谈,分析了两个结束性问题:"你认为游戏和学习可以同时进行吗?玩和学习,它们之间有什么区别?"对参与者的回答进行了词法分析。对当地结果进行了定性分析,以建立一个跨文化语料库。结果 出现了多种理解,从不确定性的同时存在(儿童的特点)到有益的同时存在(母亲的特点)。对许多儿童来说,游戏和学习是不同的活动领域,只有在儿童中才有证据表明学习是 游戏的必要条件。对所有母亲来说,日常活动都是学习的机会。结论儿童在游戏中学习,但学习中的游戏仅限于学术学习。霸权教育观念影响了参与者的看法。母亲们表达了游戏与学习共存的 "理想 "情境与不共存的日常情境之间的差异。对这些实践之间协同作用的深刻理解可以释放它们的相互丰富性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Children’s and mothers’ understanding of play and learning: Repertoires across five cultures

Background

Multiple tensions pervade the relationship between play and learning. Children's perceptions of this relationship are rarely analysed or placed alongside their parents' views. Literature has focused on predominant themes ignoring intra and inter-cultural variability.

Aims

We aimed to capture the different ways in which children and mothers in different cultural contexts conceive children's daily activities as instances of play and of learning.

Samples

Participants were 392 children (aged 5 and 7) and 192 mothers from Argentina, Denmark, China, England, United States.

Methods

Through a semi-structured interview, two closing questions were analysed: ‘Do you think it's possible to play and learn at the same time? Playing and learning, what's the difference between them?‘Lexicometry was applied to participants' responses. Qualitative analysis of local results was carried out to build a cross-cultural repertoire.

Results

A wide range of understandings emerged ranging from an impossibility of co-occurrence (characteristic of children) to a beneficial co-occurrence (characteristic of mothers). For many children play and learning constitute separate realms of activity and only among children is there evidence that learning is necessary to play. For all mothers, daily activities are opportunities for learning. Intra age-group heterogeneity varied across sites.

Conclusions

Learning in play was conceived by the children, but play in learning was restricted to academic learning. Hegemonic conceptions of education influenced participants' perceptions. The mothers expressed discrepancies between ‘ideal’ situations of co-occurrence between play and learning, and daily situations of not co-occurrence. A deep understanding of the synergies between these practices can unlock their mutual enrichment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being Comparison effects on self- and external ratings: Testing the generalizability of the 2I/E model to parents and teachers of academic track school students Testing the CONIC model: The interplay of conscientiousness and interest in predicting academic effort Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1