Mohammad Hafez Ahmed, Golnoosh Khajouei, Payton Seats, Karen Buzby, Harry Finklea, Nicholas Siefert, Heather Hunter and Lian-Shin Lin*,
{"title":"冷却排污水与采出水的新型协同处理:资源回收和减少处理足迹的区域方法","authors":"Mohammad Hafez Ahmed, Golnoosh Khajouei, Payton Seats, Karen Buzby, Harry Finklea, Nicholas Siefert, Heather Hunter and Lian-Shin Lin*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0025910.1021/acsestwater.4c00259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Taking advantage of the complementary chemistries of the cooling blowdown water (BDW) and produced water (PW) from shale gas production, this pilot study evaluated their co-treatment feasibility to generate useful products while reducing treatment footprints. The process includes the mixing of BDW and PW, chemical softening, activated carbon (AC) filtration, and reverse osmosis (RO). The results showed that a simple mixing of BDW and PW (BDW/PW = 5) readily removed 98% of barium and 85% of sulfate and generated a high-density (4.1 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) barite-dominant solid with a yield of 1.92 kg/m<sup>3</sup> mixed water. Softening using sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide removed >95% scale forming divalent ions, and the AC filtration resulted in ∼90% total organic carbon removal. RO treatment of the AC effluent achieved ∼60% water recovery. Compared to BDW and PW treated separately, the co-treatment process resulted in a ∼70% chemical saving. The RO concentrate had high enough TDS (77 g/L) suitable for thermal evaporation to generate commercial-grade 10-lb brine. An initial technoeconomic analysis of a co-treatment scenario using a thermoelectric powerplant in West Virginia shows cost saving potential and revenue generation. This study demonstrates the potential of the co-treatment method as a useful tool for sustainable regional water management.</p><p >Co-management of cooling blowdown water and produced water offers opportunities of critical mineral and low-salinity water recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"4 8","pages":"3412–3422 3412–3422"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Co-treatment of Cooling Blowdown Water and Produced Water: A Regional Approach for Resource Recovery and Treatment Footprint Reduction\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hafez Ahmed, Golnoosh Khajouei, Payton Seats, Karen Buzby, Harry Finklea, Nicholas Siefert, Heather Hunter and Lian-Shin Lin*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0025910.1021/acsestwater.4c00259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Taking advantage of the complementary chemistries of the cooling blowdown water (BDW) and produced water (PW) from shale gas production, this pilot study evaluated their co-treatment feasibility to generate useful products while reducing treatment footprints. The process includes the mixing of BDW and PW, chemical softening, activated carbon (AC) filtration, and reverse osmosis (RO). The results showed that a simple mixing of BDW and PW (BDW/PW = 5) readily removed 98% of barium and 85% of sulfate and generated a high-density (4.1 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) barite-dominant solid with a yield of 1.92 kg/m<sup>3</sup> mixed water. Softening using sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide removed >95% scale forming divalent ions, and the AC filtration resulted in ∼90% total organic carbon removal. RO treatment of the AC effluent achieved ∼60% water recovery. Compared to BDW and PW treated separately, the co-treatment process resulted in a ∼70% chemical saving. The RO concentrate had high enough TDS (77 g/L) suitable for thermal evaporation to generate commercial-grade 10-lb brine. An initial technoeconomic analysis of a co-treatment scenario using a thermoelectric powerplant in West Virginia shows cost saving potential and revenue generation. This study demonstrates the potential of the co-treatment method as a useful tool for sustainable regional water management.</p><p >Co-management of cooling blowdown water and produced water offers opportunities of critical mineral and low-salinity water recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"volume\":\"4 8\",\"pages\":\"3412–3422 3412–3422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00259\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novel Co-treatment of Cooling Blowdown Water and Produced Water: A Regional Approach for Resource Recovery and Treatment Footprint Reduction
Taking advantage of the complementary chemistries of the cooling blowdown water (BDW) and produced water (PW) from shale gas production, this pilot study evaluated their co-treatment feasibility to generate useful products while reducing treatment footprints. The process includes the mixing of BDW and PW, chemical softening, activated carbon (AC) filtration, and reverse osmosis (RO). The results showed that a simple mixing of BDW and PW (BDW/PW = 5) readily removed 98% of barium and 85% of sulfate and generated a high-density (4.1 g/cm3) barite-dominant solid with a yield of 1.92 kg/m3 mixed water. Softening using sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide removed >95% scale forming divalent ions, and the AC filtration resulted in ∼90% total organic carbon removal. RO treatment of the AC effluent achieved ∼60% water recovery. Compared to BDW and PW treated separately, the co-treatment process resulted in a ∼70% chemical saving. The RO concentrate had high enough TDS (77 g/L) suitable for thermal evaporation to generate commercial-grade 10-lb brine. An initial technoeconomic analysis of a co-treatment scenario using a thermoelectric powerplant in West Virginia shows cost saving potential and revenue generation. This study demonstrates the potential of the co-treatment method as a useful tool for sustainable regional water management.
Co-management of cooling blowdown water and produced water offers opportunities of critical mineral and low-salinity water recovery.