利用深度学习方法加强市场园艺作物的胁迫和病虫害管理:综合分析

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Smart agricultural technology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100521
{"title":"利用深度学习方法加强市场园艺作物的胁迫和病虫害管理:综合分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Various deep learning methods are employed to detect stress and diseases in market garden crops, as well as to assess their severity. This study aims to comprehensively analyze these techniques and identify potential research avenues. The diversity of deep learning techniques was explored through a literature review based on the PRISMA guidelines. Research equations were defined, resulting in a sample of <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>422</mn></math></span> publications, of which 72 were deemed usable and considered in the final analysis. For classification tasks, hybrid CNN models were the most widely used (19.2%). Commonly utilized models included VGG16 (10%), InceptionV3 (6.1%), DCNN (5%), and YoloV5 (5%). In object detection tasks, Fast R-CNN was used six times, followed by YoloV5 (three occurrences) and YoloV3 (two occurrences). In segmentation tasks, Mask R-CNN accounted for 28.67% of the models, while DeepLabV3+ accounted for 24.98%. Assessing disease severity in market garden crops is complex due to the unique criteria for each plant disease and the presence of multiple diseases across different crop types. To address this complexity, establishing a standardized method is crucial. Further research is essential to enhance the application of deep learning techniques in the study of market garden crops. This includes gathering extensive datasets that encompass various scenarios of crop diseases and considering the impact of climate variations on stress manifestation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001266/pdfft?md5=11f8833021e6b2a9c9d7b21ec215d816&pid=1-s2.0-S2772375524001266-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning methods for enhanced stress and pest management in market garden crops: A comprehensive analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Various deep learning methods are employed to detect stress and diseases in market garden crops, as well as to assess their severity. This study aims to comprehensively analyze these techniques and identify potential research avenues. The diversity of deep learning techniques was explored through a literature review based on the PRISMA guidelines. Research equations were defined, resulting in a sample of <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>422</mn></math></span> publications, of which 72 were deemed usable and considered in the final analysis. For classification tasks, hybrid CNN models were the most widely used (19.2%). Commonly utilized models included VGG16 (10%), InceptionV3 (6.1%), DCNN (5%), and YoloV5 (5%). In object detection tasks, Fast R-CNN was used six times, followed by YoloV5 (three occurrences) and YoloV3 (two occurrences). In segmentation tasks, Mask R-CNN accounted for 28.67% of the models, while DeepLabV3+ accounted for 24.98%. Assessing disease severity in market garden crops is complex due to the unique criteria for each plant disease and the presence of multiple diseases across different crop types. To address this complexity, establishing a standardized method is crucial. Further research is essential to enhance the application of deep learning techniques in the study of market garden crops. This includes gathering extensive datasets that encompass various scenarios of crop diseases and considering the impact of climate variations on stress manifestation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001266/pdfft?md5=11f8833021e6b2a9c9d7b21ec215d816&pid=1-s2.0-S2772375524001266-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各种深度学习方法被用于检测市场园艺作物的压力和病害,以及评估其严重程度。本研究旨在全面分析这些技术,并确定潜在的研究途径。根据 PRISMA 准则,通过文献综述探索了深度学习技术的多样性。对研究等式进行了定义,得出了 1422 篇出版物样本,其中 72 篇被认为是可用的,并在最终分析中予以考虑。在分类任务中,混合 CNN 模型的使用最为广泛(19.2%)。常用的模型包括 VGG16(10%)、InceptionV3(6.1%)、DCNN(5%)和 YoloV5(5%)。在物体检测任务中,快速 R-CNN 被使用了 6 次,其次是 YoloV5(3 次)和 YoloV3(2 次)。在分割任务中,Mask R-CNN 模型占 28.67%,而 DeepLabV3+ 模型占 24.98%。由于每种植物病害都有独特的标准,而且不同作物类型存在多种病害,因此评估市场园艺作物的病害严重程度非常复杂。要解决这一复杂问题,建立标准化方法至关重要。要加强深度学习技术在市场园艺作物研究中的应用,必须开展进一步的研究。这包括收集包含各种作物病害情况的广泛数据集,并考虑气候变异对胁迫表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning methods for enhanced stress and pest management in market garden crops: A comprehensive analysis

Various deep learning methods are employed to detect stress and diseases in market garden crops, as well as to assess their severity. This study aims to comprehensively analyze these techniques and identify potential research avenues. The diversity of deep learning techniques was explored through a literature review based on the PRISMA guidelines. Research equations were defined, resulting in a sample of 1,422 publications, of which 72 were deemed usable and considered in the final analysis. For classification tasks, hybrid CNN models were the most widely used (19.2%). Commonly utilized models included VGG16 (10%), InceptionV3 (6.1%), DCNN (5%), and YoloV5 (5%). In object detection tasks, Fast R-CNN was used six times, followed by YoloV5 (three occurrences) and YoloV3 (two occurrences). In segmentation tasks, Mask R-CNN accounted for 28.67% of the models, while DeepLabV3+ accounted for 24.98%. Assessing disease severity in market garden crops is complex due to the unique criteria for each plant disease and the presence of multiple diseases across different crop types. To address this complexity, establishing a standardized method is crucial. Further research is essential to enhance the application of deep learning techniques in the study of market garden crops. This includes gathering extensive datasets that encompass various scenarios of crop diseases and considering the impact of climate variations on stress manifestation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep learning-based sow posture classifier using colour and depth images Assessing plant pigmentation impacts: A novel approach integrating UAV and multispectral data to analyze atrazine metabolite effects from soil contamination Field scale wheat yield prediction using ensemble machine learning techniques Developing a reference method for indirect measurement of pasture evapotranspiration at sub-meter spatial resolution Public irrigation decision support systems (IDSS) in Italy: Description, evaluation and national context overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1