解释和探索强化学习背景下符合道德和值得信赖的人工智能

Theodore C. McCullough
{"title":"解释和探索强化学习背景下符合道德和值得信赖的人工智能","authors":"Theodore C. McCullough","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2024.3406513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An interdisciplinary approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is necessary to address issues arising from the overlap in the areas of Reinforcement Learning (RL), ethics, and the law. Some types of RL, due to their use of evaluative feedback in combination with function approximation, give rise to new strategies for problem-solving that are not easily foreseen or anticipated, and embody the monkey paw problem. This is the problem related to RL that grants what one asked for, and not what one should have asked for or in terms of what was intended. Sometimes these new strategies can be characterized as promoting a social good, but there is the possibility that they could give rise to outcomes that are not aligned with social goods. Control applications in the form of supervised learning (SL)-based solutions may be used to control for unaligned new strategies. These control applications, however, may introduce bias such that ethical and legal regimes may need to be put into place to solve for such biases. These ethical and legal regimes may be based upon generally agreed to social conventions as traditional ethical regimes in the form of utilitarianism and deontological ethics may provide an incomplete solution. Further, these social conventions may need to be implemented by people and ultimately the corporations instructing these people on how to perform their jobs.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"5 2","pages":"198-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining and Exploring Ethical and Trustworthy AI in the Context of Reinforcement Learning\",\"authors\":\"Theodore C. McCullough\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TTS.2024.3406513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An interdisciplinary approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is necessary to address issues arising from the overlap in the areas of Reinforcement Learning (RL), ethics, and the law. Some types of RL, due to their use of evaluative feedback in combination with function approximation, give rise to new strategies for problem-solving that are not easily foreseen or anticipated, and embody the monkey paw problem. This is the problem related to RL that grants what one asked for, and not what one should have asked for or in terms of what was intended. Sometimes these new strategies can be characterized as promoting a social good, but there is the possibility that they could give rise to outcomes that are not aligned with social goods. Control applications in the form of supervised learning (SL)-based solutions may be used to control for unaligned new strategies. These control applications, however, may introduce bias such that ethical and legal regimes may need to be put into place to solve for such biases. These ethical and legal regimes may be based upon generally agreed to social conventions as traditional ethical regimes in the form of utilitarianism and deontological ethics may provide an incomplete solution. Further, these social conventions may need to be implemented by people and ultimately the corporations instructing these people on how to perform their jobs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on technology and society\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"198-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on technology and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10542445/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10542445/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)需要一种跨学科的方法,以解决强化学习(RL)、伦理和法律领域重叠所产生的问题。某些类型的强化学习(RL)由于将评价反馈与函数近似相结合,会产生不易预见或预料的新的问题解决策略,这就是猴爪问题。这就是与 RL 有关的问题,它给予了人们所要求的东西,而不是人们本应要求的东西,也不是人们想要的东西。有时,这些新策略可以被描述为促进社会公益,但也有可能产生与社会公益不相符的结果。基于监督学习(SL)解决方案的控制应用可用于控制不一致的新策略。然而,这些控制应用可能会带来偏差,因此可能需要建立道德和法律制度来解决这些偏差。这些伦理和法律制度可以建立在普遍认同的社会习俗基础上,因为传统的伦理制度,如功利主义和去本位主义伦理,可能无法提供完整的解决方案。此外,这些社会习俗可能需要由人来执行,并最终由企业来指导这些人如何履行其职责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explaining and Exploring Ethical and Trustworthy AI in the Context of Reinforcement Learning
An interdisciplinary approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is necessary to address issues arising from the overlap in the areas of Reinforcement Learning (RL), ethics, and the law. Some types of RL, due to their use of evaluative feedback in combination with function approximation, give rise to new strategies for problem-solving that are not easily foreseen or anticipated, and embody the monkey paw problem. This is the problem related to RL that grants what one asked for, and not what one should have asked for or in terms of what was intended. Sometimes these new strategies can be characterized as promoting a social good, but there is the possibility that they could give rise to outcomes that are not aligned with social goods. Control applications in the form of supervised learning (SL)-based solutions may be used to control for unaligned new strategies. These control applications, however, may introduce bias such that ethical and legal regimes may need to be put into place to solve for such biases. These ethical and legal regimes may be based upon generally agreed to social conventions as traditional ethical regimes in the form of utilitarianism and deontological ethics may provide an incomplete solution. Further, these social conventions may need to be implemented by people and ultimately the corporations instructing these people on how to perform their jobs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2024 Index IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society Vol. 5 Front Cover Table of Contents IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society Publication Information In This Special: Co-Designing Consumer Technology With Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1