James R Sackett, Zachary J Schlader, David Hostler, Blair D Johnson
{"title":"浸水期间静水压和高碳酸血症呼吸对通气敏感性和脑血管反应性的独立影响。","authors":"James R Sackett, Zachary J Schlader, David Hostler, Blair D Johnson","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00008.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Head-out water immersion (HOWI) induces ventilatory and hemodynamic changes, which may be a result of hydrostatic pressure, augmented arterial CO<sub>2</sub> tension, or a combination of both. We hypothesized that the hydrostatic pressure and elevated CO<sub>2</sub> tension that occur during HOWI will contribute to an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> and an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> during water immersion. Twelve subjects [age: 24 ± 3 yr, body mass index (BMI): 25 ± 3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] completed HOWI, waist water immersion with CO<sub>2</sub> (WWI + CO<sub>2</sub>), and WWI, where a rebreathing test was conducted at baseline, 10, 30, and 60 min, and postimmersion. End-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]), minute ventilation, expired gases, blood pressure, heart rate, and middle cerebral artery blood velocity were recorded continuously. [Formula: see text] increased throughout all visits (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.011), was similar during HOWI and WWI + CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.264), and was greater during WWI + CO<sub>2</sub> versus WWI at 10, 30, and 60 min (<i>P</i> < 0.001). When HOWI vs. WWI + CO<sub>2</sub> were compared, the change in ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> was different at 10 (0.59 ± 0.34 vs. 0.06 ± 0.23 L/min/mmHg; <i>P</i> < 0.001), 30 (0.58 ± 0.46 vs. 0.15 ± 0.25 L/min/mmHg; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and 60 min (0.63 ± 0.45 vs. 0.16 ± 0.34 L/min/mmHg; <i>P</i> < 0.001), whereas there were no differences between conditions for cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.163). When WWI + CO<sub>2</sub> versus WWI were compared, ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> was not different between conditions (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.642), whereas the change in cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> was different at 30 min (-0.56 ± 0.38 vs. -0.30 ± 0.25 cm/s/mmHg; <i>P</i> = 0.010). These data indicate that during HOWI, ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> increases due to the hydrostatic pressure, whereas cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> decreases due to the combined effects of immersion.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Although not fully elucidated, the ventilatory and hemodynamic alterations during water immersion appear to be a result of the combined effects of immersion (i.e., elevated [Formula: see text], central hypervolemia, increased cerebral perfusion, increased work of breathing, etc.). Our findings demonstrate that an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> during immersion may be due to the hydrostatic pressure across the chest wall, whereas an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> may be due to the combined effects of immersion.</p>","PeriodicalId":7630,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The independent effects of hydrostatic pressure and hypercapnic breathing during water immersion on ventilatory sensitivity and cerebrovascular reactivity.\",\"authors\":\"James R Sackett, Zachary J Schlader, David Hostler, Blair D Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/ajpregu.00008.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Head-out water immersion (HOWI) induces ventilatory and hemodynamic changes, which may be a result of hydrostatic pressure, augmented arterial CO<sub>2</sub> tension, or a combination of both. We hypothesized that the hydrostatic pressure and elevated CO<sub>2</sub> tension that occur during HOWI will contribute to an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> and an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> during water immersion. Twelve subjects [age: 24 ± 3 yr, body mass index (BMI): 25 ± 3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] completed HOWI, waist water immersion with CO<sub>2</sub> (WWI + CO<sub>2</sub>), and WWI, where a rebreathing test was conducted at baseline, 10, 30, and 60 min, and postimmersion. End-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]), minute ventilation, expired gases, blood pressure, heart rate, and middle cerebral artery blood velocity were recorded continuously. [Formula: see text] increased throughout all visits (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.011), was similar during HOWI and WWI + CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.264), and was greater during WWI + CO<sub>2</sub> versus WWI at 10, 30, and 60 min (<i>P</i> < 0.001). When HOWI vs. WWI + CO<sub>2</sub> were compared, the change in ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> was different at 10 (0.59 ± 0.34 vs. 0.06 ± 0.23 L/min/mmHg; <i>P</i> < 0.001), 30 (0.58 ± 0.46 vs. 0.15 ± 0.25 L/min/mmHg; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and 60 min (0.63 ± 0.45 vs. 0.16 ± 0.34 L/min/mmHg; <i>P</i> < 0.001), whereas there were no differences between conditions for cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.163). When WWI + CO<sub>2</sub> versus WWI were compared, ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> was not different between conditions (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.642), whereas the change in cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> was different at 30 min (-0.56 ± 0.38 vs. -0.30 ± 0.25 cm/s/mmHg; <i>P</i> = 0.010). These data indicate that during HOWI, ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> increases due to the hydrostatic pressure, whereas cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> decreases due to the combined effects of immersion.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Although not fully elucidated, the ventilatory and hemodynamic alterations during water immersion appear to be a result of the combined effects of immersion (i.e., elevated [Formula: see text], central hypervolemia, increased cerebral perfusion, increased work of breathing, etc.). Our findings demonstrate that an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO<sub>2</sub> during immersion may be due to the hydrostatic pressure across the chest wall, whereas an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO<sub>2</sub> may be due to the combined effects of immersion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00008.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00008.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
头部向外浸入水中(HOWI)会引起通气和血液动力学变化,这可能是静水压、动脉二氧化碳张力升高或两者共同作用的结果。我们假设,在 HOWI 过程中出现的静水压和二氧化碳张力升高将有助于增强通气对二氧化碳的敏感性,并减弱浸水过程中脑血管对二氧化碳的反应性。12 名受试者(年龄:24±3 岁,体重指数:25±3 kg/m2)分别完成了 HOWI、腰部水浸二氧化碳(WWI+CO2)和 WWI,并在基线、10、30 和 60 分钟及之后进行了再呼吸测试。连续记录 PETCO2、分钟通气量、呼出气体、血压、心率和大脑中动脉血速。PETCO2 在所有检查中均有所增加(p£0.011),在 HOWI 和 WWI+CO2 期间相匹配(p³0.264),并且在 10、30 和 60 分钟时 WWI+CO2 与 WWI 相比更大(p2),通气对 CO2 的敏感性在 10 分钟时的变化不同(0.59±0.34 vs. 0.06±0.23 L/min/mmHg,p2(p³0.163)。当比较 WWI+CO2 与 WWI 时,通气对 CO2 的敏感性在不同条件下没有差异(p³0.642),而脑血管对 CO2 的反应性变化在 30 分钟时有差异(-0.56±0.38 vs. -0.30±0.25 cm/s/mmHg,p=0.010)。这些数据表明,在 HOWI 期间,通气对二氧化碳的敏感性因静水压而增加,而脑血管对二氧化碳的反应性则因浸泡的综合影响而降低。
The independent effects of hydrostatic pressure and hypercapnic breathing during water immersion on ventilatory sensitivity and cerebrovascular reactivity.
Head-out water immersion (HOWI) induces ventilatory and hemodynamic changes, which may be a result of hydrostatic pressure, augmented arterial CO2 tension, or a combination of both. We hypothesized that the hydrostatic pressure and elevated CO2 tension that occur during HOWI will contribute to an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 and an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 during water immersion. Twelve subjects [age: 24 ± 3 yr, body mass index (BMI): 25 ± 3 kg/m2] completed HOWI, waist water immersion with CO2 (WWI + CO2), and WWI, where a rebreathing test was conducted at baseline, 10, 30, and 60 min, and postimmersion. End-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]), minute ventilation, expired gases, blood pressure, heart rate, and middle cerebral artery blood velocity were recorded continuously. [Formula: see text] increased throughout all visits (P ≤ 0.011), was similar during HOWI and WWI + CO2 (P ≥ 0.264), and was greater during WWI + CO2 versus WWI at 10, 30, and 60 min (P < 0.001). When HOWI vs. WWI + CO2 were compared, the change in ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 was different at 10 (0.59 ± 0.34 vs. 0.06 ± 0.23 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), 30 (0.58 ± 0.46 vs. 0.15 ± 0.25 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), and 60 min (0.63 ± 0.45 vs. 0.16 ± 0.34 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), whereas there were no differences between conditions for cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 (P ≥ 0.163). When WWI + CO2 versus WWI were compared, ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 was not different between conditions (P ≥ 0.642), whereas the change in cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 was different at 30 min (-0.56 ± 0.38 vs. -0.30 ± 0.25 cm/s/mmHg; P = 0.010). These data indicate that during HOWI, ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 increases due to the hydrostatic pressure, whereas cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 decreases due to the combined effects of immersion.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although not fully elucidated, the ventilatory and hemodynamic alterations during water immersion appear to be a result of the combined effects of immersion (i.e., elevated [Formula: see text], central hypervolemia, increased cerebral perfusion, increased work of breathing, etc.). Our findings demonstrate that an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 during immersion may be due to the hydrostatic pressure across the chest wall, whereas an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 may be due to the combined effects of immersion.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology publishes original investigations that illuminate normal or abnormal regulation and integration of physiological mechanisms at all levels of biological organization, ranging from molecules to humans, including clinical investigations. Major areas of emphasis include regulation in genetically modified animals; model organisms; development and tissue plasticity; neurohumoral control of circulation and hypertension; local control of circulation; cardiac and renal integration; thirst and volume, electrolyte homeostasis; glucose homeostasis and energy balance; appetite and obesity; inflammation and cytokines; integrative physiology of pregnancy-parturition-lactation; and thermoregulation and adaptations to exercise and environmental stress.