{"title":"论弧状筋膜在造词和复述中的作用:对 Van den Hoven 等人(2024 年)的答复。","authors":"Ardi Roelofs","doi":"10.1007/s00429-024-02849-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Van den Hoven et al. contested my interpretation of Wernicke regarding the role of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) in word production. Here, I clarify and defend my interpretation. They also questioned the assumption of AF subtracts in my modern account, stating that subtracts are difficult to distinguish anatomically due to overlapping terminations. Here, I make clear that overlap in terminations was actually part of my account, in which differentially damaged subtracts explained patients' differential naming and repetition performance as well as types of repetition performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the role of the arcuate fasciculus in word production and repetition: a reply to Van den Hoven et al. (2024).\",\"authors\":\"Ardi Roelofs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00429-024-02849-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Van den Hoven et al. contested my interpretation of Wernicke regarding the role of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) in word production. Here, I clarify and defend my interpretation. They also questioned the assumption of AF subtracts in my modern account, stating that subtracts are difficult to distinguish anatomically due to overlapping terminations. Here, I make clear that overlap in terminations was actually part of my account, in which differentially damaged subtracts explained patients' differential naming and repetition performance as well as types of repetition performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02849-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02849-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Van den Hoven 等人对我对 Wernicke 关于弓状筋膜(AF)在词语生成中的作用的解释提出了质疑。在此,我对我的解释进行了澄清和辩护。他们还对我的现代解释中关于弓状筋膜减数的假设提出质疑,认为由于末端重叠,减数在解剖学上很难区分。在此,我明确指出,末端重叠实际上是我的解释的一部分,在我的解释中,受损程度不同的减数可以解释患者不同的命名和复述表现以及复述表现的类型。
On the role of the arcuate fasciculus in word production and repetition: a reply to Van den Hoven et al. (2024).
Van den Hoven et al. contested my interpretation of Wernicke regarding the role of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) in word production. Here, I clarify and defend my interpretation. They also questioned the assumption of AF subtracts in my modern account, stating that subtracts are difficult to distinguish anatomically due to overlapping terminations. Here, I make clear that overlap in terminations was actually part of my account, in which differentially damaged subtracts explained patients' differential naming and repetition performance as well as types of repetition performance.
期刊介绍:
Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.