利妥昔单抗治疗伴有神经和/或精神症状的成人难治性系统性红斑狼疮:符合PRISMA标准的荟萃分析。

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Current rheumatology reviews Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.2174/0115733971309959240722062141
Mehran Asad Ayoubi, Maryam Moghaddassi, Mehdi Aloosh
{"title":"利妥昔单抗治疗伴有神经和/或精神症状的成人难治性系统性红斑狼疮:符合PRISMA标准的荟萃分析。","authors":"Mehran Asad Ayoubi, Maryam Moghaddassi, Mehdi Aloosh","doi":"10.2174/0115733971309959240722062141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab (RTX) is used off-label for refractory cases of systemic lupus\nerythematosus (SLE) with extrarenal activity, including neurological and/or psychiatric (N/P) presentations. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis of the effectiveness and safety of RTX\ntherapy for adult refractory SLE with N/P manifestations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches in PubMed, Epistemonikos, and ICTRP databases and statistical\nanalysis were conducted in May 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Electronic searches identified 20 studies (25 reports). A total of 59 patients (53 females;\n90%) were included, with a mean age of 33.5±10.6 years and a median disease duration of 3.5\nyears (range, 0.08 to 25.0) who were followed up post-RTX therapy for a median time of 12\nmonths (range, 3.0 to 46.2). The rate of clinical response (partial or major) was 90% (95% CI, 83\nto 96) (n = 57 patients). A third of responders relapsed after a median time of 9.5 months (range,\n3.0 to 33.0). Pooled pre-RTX/post-RTX scores for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) (n = 13) were 19±15/7±5 and for neurological British Isles Lupus Assessment\nGroup (BILAG) (n = 29) were A/D (13), A/C (5), B/D (7), B/C (2), and A/A (2). Patients without\nmood disorder had a higher chance of clinical response {relative risk (RR) 1.4 (1.03 to 1.48)}. Patients who benefited the most from RTX therapy were those with psychosis (a higher chance of\nmajor clinical response; RR 1.9 (1.02 to 2.34)), without acute confusional state (a lower chance of\nrelapse; RR 0.08 (0.006 to 0.791)), and with disease duration <3 years (a lower chance of relapse;\nRR 0.18 (0.014 to 0.992)). Infection rate during treatment was 33% (7/21).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTX therapy had good effectiveness. The pooled evidence for safety outcomes was\nlimited and of low certainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":11188,"journal":{"name":"Current rheumatology reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rituximab Therapy for Adult Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Neurological and/or Psychiatric Presentations: A PRISMACompliant Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mehran Asad Ayoubi, Maryam Moghaddassi, Mehdi Aloosh\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115733971309959240722062141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab (RTX) is used off-label for refractory cases of systemic lupus\\nerythematosus (SLE) with extrarenal activity, including neurological and/or psychiatric (N/P) presentations. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis of the effectiveness and safety of RTX\\ntherapy for adult refractory SLE with N/P manifestations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches in PubMed, Epistemonikos, and ICTRP databases and statistical\\nanalysis were conducted in May 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Electronic searches identified 20 studies (25 reports). A total of 59 patients (53 females;\\n90%) were included, with a mean age of 33.5±10.6 years and a median disease duration of 3.5\\nyears (range, 0.08 to 25.0) who were followed up post-RTX therapy for a median time of 12\\nmonths (range, 3.0 to 46.2). The rate of clinical response (partial or major) was 90% (95% CI, 83\\nto 96) (n = 57 patients). A third of responders relapsed after a median time of 9.5 months (range,\\n3.0 to 33.0). Pooled pre-RTX/post-RTX scores for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) (n = 13) were 19±15/7±5 and for neurological British Isles Lupus Assessment\\nGroup (BILAG) (n = 29) were A/D (13), A/C (5), B/D (7), B/C (2), and A/A (2). Patients without\\nmood disorder had a higher chance of clinical response {relative risk (RR) 1.4 (1.03 to 1.48)}. Patients who benefited the most from RTX therapy were those with psychosis (a higher chance of\\nmajor clinical response; RR 1.9 (1.02 to 2.34)), without acute confusional state (a lower chance of\\nrelapse; RR 0.08 (0.006 to 0.791)), and with disease duration <3 years (a lower chance of relapse;\\nRR 0.18 (0.014 to 0.992)). Infection rate during treatment was 33% (7/21).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTX therapy had good effectiveness. The pooled evidence for safety outcomes was\\nlimited and of low certainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current rheumatology reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current rheumatology reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733971309959240722062141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current rheumatology reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733971309959240722062141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:利妥昔单抗(RTX利妥昔单抗(Rituximab,RTX)在标签外被用于治疗具有肾外活动的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)难治性病例,包括神经和/或精神(N/P)症状。然而,来自随机对照试验的证据有限:本研究旨在对RTX治疗伴有N/P表现的成人难治性系统性红斑狼疮的有效性和安全性进行汇总分析:方法:对数据库进行电子检索,并进行统计分析:2023年5月,在PubMed、Epistemonikos和ICTRP中进行电子检索,共发现20项研究(25篇报告)。共纳入 59 名患者(53 名女性;90%),平均年龄为(33.5±10.6)岁,中位病程为 3.5 年(范围为 0.08 至 25.0),RTX 治疗后随访的中位时间为 12 个月(范围为 3.0 至 46.2)。临床应答率(部分或主要应答)为 90%(95% CI,83 至 96)(57 例患者)。三分之一的应答者在中位时间9.5个月(3.0至33.0个月)后复发。RTX前/RTX后系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)(n = 13)的汇总评分为19±15/7±5,神经系统的英伦三岛狼疮评估组(BILAG)(n = 29)评分为A/D(13)、A/C(5)、B/D(7)、B/C(2)和A/A(2)。没有情绪障碍的患者有更高的临床应答几率{相对风险(RR)1.4(1.03 至 1.48)}。从RTX治疗中获益最多的患者是那些患有精神病(出现重大临床反应的几率更高;RR为1.9(1.02至2.34))、没有急性意识混乱状态(复发几率较低;RR为0.08(0.006至0.791))以及病程结论为结论的患者:RTX疗法具有良好的疗效。有关安全性结果的汇总证据有限,且确定性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rituximab Therapy for Adult Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Neurological and/or Psychiatric Presentations: A PRISMACompliant Meta-Analysis

Background: Rituximab (RTX) is used off-label for refractory cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with extrarenal activity, including neurological and/or psychiatric (N/P) presentations. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials is limited.

Objective: This study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis of the effectiveness and safety of RTX therapy for adult refractory SLE with N/P manifestations.

Methods: Electronic searches in PubMed, Epistemonikos, and ICTRP databases and statistical analysis were conducted in May 2023.

Results: Electronic searches identified 20 studies (25 reports). A total of 59 patients (53 females; 90%) were included, with a mean age of 33.5±10.6 years and a median disease duration of 3.5 years (range, 0.08 to 25.0) who were followed up post-RTX therapy for a median time of 12 months (range, 3.0 to 46.2). The rate of clinical response (partial or major) was 90% (95% CI, 83 to 96) (n = 57 patients). A third of responders relapsed after a median time of 9.5 months (range, 3.0 to 33.0). Pooled pre-RTX/post-RTX scores for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) (n = 13) were 19±15/7±5 and for neurological British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) (n = 29) were A/D (13), A/C (5), B/D (7), B/C (2), and A/A (2). Patients without mood disorder had a higher chance of clinical response {relative risk (RR) 1.4 (1.03 to 1.48)}. Patients who benefited the most from RTX therapy were those with psychosis (a higher chance of major clinical response; RR 1.9 (1.02 to 2.34)), without acute confusional state (a lower chance of relapse; RR 0.08 (0.006 to 0.791)), and with disease duration <3 years (a lower chance of relapse; RR 0.18 (0.014 to 0.992)). Infection rate during treatment was 33% (7/21).

Conclusions: RTX therapy had good effectiveness. The pooled evidence for safety outcomes was limited and of low certainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Current Rheumatology Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on rheumatology and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in rheumatology.
期刊最新文献
Upadacitinib and Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sjögren's Syndrome and Ankylosing Spondylitis Association: A Case-Based Review. Unmasking the Hidden Peril: A Case Report of Ankylosing Spondylitis Revealing a Giant Aortic Aneurysm. The Ability of Indigenous Plants in Alleviating Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comprehensive Review. Promising Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Ursolic Acid Isolated from Atylosia goensis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1