术后辅助化疗对老年结直肠腺癌患者预后的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16685
Heng Huang, Xijiong Chen, Jinyi Xu, Maopu Tu, Bin Lai, Xi Ouyang
{"title":"术后辅助化疗对老年结直肠腺癌患者预后的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。","authors":"Heng Huang, Xijiong Chen, Jinyi Xu, Maopu Tu, Bin Lai, Xi Ouyang","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Currently, the primary treatment modality for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) is radical surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC). However, many elderly patients decline PAC due to concerns about their underlying physiological condition, and the impact of PAC on the prognosis of elderly patients remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted data from the SEER database for CRA patients aged 75 and above between 2010 and 2019. Utilizing propensity score matching (PSM), we stratified the patients into a PAC group and a non-PAC group, enabling us to compare the differences in Kaplan-Meier survival curves between these two groups. Furthermore, through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, we identified the clinical factors that influence the survival of elderly CRA patients and compared the prognostic disparities between the two patient groups within specific subgroups of these clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following PSM, a total of 3668 patients were included and divided into the PAC group and the non-PAC group, with no statistically significant differences observed in crucial clinical characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly better prognosis for patients in the PAC group compared with those in the non-PAC group. In addition, age, chemotherapy, TNM staging, gender, and preoperative CEA levels were all identified as important factors affecting patient prognosis. Moreover, PAC provided survival benefits across the majority of levels within the aforementioned subgroups. However, in specific subgroups (age > 90, Grade IV stage, median household income < $40 000), PAC did not confer any survival benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAC can significantly improve the prognosis of elderly CRA patients. Nonetheless, in certain population subsets characterized by specific clinical features, PAC does not provide any survival benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on elderly patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching study.\",\"authors\":\"Heng Huang, Xijiong Chen, Jinyi Xu, Maopu Tu, Bin Lai, Xi Ouyang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.16685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Currently, the primary treatment modality for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) is radical surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC). However, many elderly patients decline PAC due to concerns about their underlying physiological condition, and the impact of PAC on the prognosis of elderly patients remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted data from the SEER database for CRA patients aged 75 and above between 2010 and 2019. Utilizing propensity score matching (PSM), we stratified the patients into a PAC group and a non-PAC group, enabling us to compare the differences in Kaplan-Meier survival curves between these two groups. Furthermore, through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, we identified the clinical factors that influence the survival of elderly CRA patients and compared the prognostic disparities between the two patient groups within specific subgroups of these clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following PSM, a total of 3668 patients were included and divided into the PAC group and the non-PAC group, with no statistically significant differences observed in crucial clinical characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly better prognosis for patients in the PAC group compared with those in the non-PAC group. In addition, age, chemotherapy, TNM staging, gender, and preoperative CEA levels were all identified as important factors affecting patient prognosis. Moreover, PAC provided survival benefits across the majority of levels within the aforementioned subgroups. However, in specific subgroups (age > 90, Grade IV stage, median household income < $40 000), PAC did not confer any survival benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAC can significantly improve the prognosis of elderly CRA patients. Nonetheless, in certain population subsets characterized by specific clinical features, PAC does not provide any survival benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16685\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:目前,结直肠腺癌(CRA)患者的主要治疗方式是根治性手术联合术后辅助化疗(PAC)。然而,许多老年患者因担心其潜在的生理状况而拒绝接受 PAC,而且 PAC 对老年患者预后的影响仍不确定:我们从 SEER 数据库中提取了 2010 年至 2019 年期间 75 岁及以上 CRA 患者的数据。利用倾向评分匹配(PSM),我们将患者分为 PAC 组和非 PAC 组,从而比较了两组患者 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线的差异。此外,通过单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析,我们确定了影响老年 CRA 患者生存的临床因素,并比较了在这些临床因素的特定亚组中两组患者的预后差异:经过 PSM 筛选,共纳入 3668 例患者,分为 PAC 组和非 PAC 组,两组患者的关键临床特征无统计学差异。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,PAC组患者的预后明显优于非PAC组患者。此外,年龄、化疗、TNM 分期、性别和术前 CEA 水平都被认为是影响患者预后的重要因素。此外,在上述亚组别中,PAC 在大多数水平上都能为患者带来生存获益。然而,在特定的亚组(年龄大于 90 岁、IV 级分期、家庭收入中位数 结论:PAC 能显著改善患者的预后:PAC 可明显改善老年 CRA 患者的预后。然而,在某些具有特定临床特征的亚组人群中,PAC 并不能带来任何生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on elderly patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching study.

Background and aim: Currently, the primary treatment modality for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) is radical surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC). However, many elderly patients decline PAC due to concerns about their underlying physiological condition, and the impact of PAC on the prognosis of elderly patients remains uncertain.

Methods: We extracted data from the SEER database for CRA patients aged 75 and above between 2010 and 2019. Utilizing propensity score matching (PSM), we stratified the patients into a PAC group and a non-PAC group, enabling us to compare the differences in Kaplan-Meier survival curves between these two groups. Furthermore, through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, we identified the clinical factors that influence the survival of elderly CRA patients and compared the prognostic disparities between the two patient groups within specific subgroups of these clinical factors.

Results: Following PSM, a total of 3668 patients were included and divided into the PAC group and the non-PAC group, with no statistically significant differences observed in crucial clinical characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly better prognosis for patients in the PAC group compared with those in the non-PAC group. In addition, age, chemotherapy, TNM staging, gender, and preoperative CEA levels were all identified as important factors affecting patient prognosis. Moreover, PAC provided survival benefits across the majority of levels within the aforementioned subgroups. However, in specific subgroups (age > 90, Grade IV stage, median household income < $40 000), PAC did not confer any survival benefits.

Conclusion: PAC can significantly improve the prognosis of elderly CRA patients. Nonetheless, in certain population subsets characterized by specific clinical features, PAC does not provide any survival benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating vonoprazan bismuth‐containing triple therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle biopsy using macroscopic on‐site evaluation technique reduces the number passes yet maintains a high diagnostic accuracy: A randomized study Bioinformatics and experimental validation were combined to explore lactylation‐related biomarkers in HBV‐associated acute liver failure Selenium alleviates dextran sulfate sodium‐induced colitis and inhibits ferroptosis of intestinal epithelial cells via upregulating glutathione peroxidase 4 Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: Unique features and low lethality compared with small bowel adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1