Papri Sarkar MD, Adriana Vest MD, Marisa Baker MD, Lauri Silver Hochberg MD
{"title":"超声引导下的息肉切除术:评估在诊室中切除子宫内膜息肉的新技术。","authors":"Papri Sarkar MD, Adriana Vest MD, Marisa Baker MD, Lauri Silver Hochberg MD","doi":"10.1002/jum.16548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To present a novel technique for office resection of pedunculated endometrial polyps under ultrasound guidance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective trial was conducted at an academic center where women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) who were diagnosed an endometrial polyp following saline infusion sonogram (SIS), were offered polyp removal under ultrasound guidance using a universal grasping forceps (2.5 mm × 25 cm). The primary outcome was to evaluate the feasibility of this technique for complete removal of the polyp. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the patients' pain score, satisfaction score using visual analogue score (VAS), and efficacy of the technique in alleviating symptoms in patients with AUB due to polyps.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty patients participated, with a mean age of 54.8 ± 11 years. Average polyp volume was 1.87 cm<sup>3</sup> and mean duration for polypectomy was 11 minutes 31 seconds. The median pain score immediately post-procedure was 5 (0–9). We were unable to complete the procedure in two patients due to patient discomfort and poor visualization. Complete removal of polyp was ensured by checking for a thin endometrial echo at the end of the procedure and by performing SIS at 3-months post-procedure. Of the 22 patients who returned for follow-up, 19 (86.36%) showed no evidence of polyp on SIS and all reported resolution of AUB symptoms. The median satisfaction score at the follow-up was 10/10. Adequate pathology samples were obtained from all cases, diagnosing malignancy in one and endometrial hyperplasia in one patient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This technique offers safe and effective removal of pedunculated endometrial polyps in an office setting, avoiding the need for general anesthesia. It can be offered as a therapeutic option at the initial point of contact, providing symptom relief and tissue diagnosis while reducing costs and patient visits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"43 11","pages":"2169-2175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-Guided Polypectomy\",\"authors\":\"Papri Sarkar MD, Adriana Vest MD, Marisa Baker MD, Lauri Silver Hochberg MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.16548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To present a novel technique for office resection of pedunculated endometrial polyps under ultrasound guidance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A prospective trial was conducted at an academic center where women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) who were diagnosed an endometrial polyp following saline infusion sonogram (SIS), were offered polyp removal under ultrasound guidance using a universal grasping forceps (2.5 mm × 25 cm). The primary outcome was to evaluate the feasibility of this technique for complete removal of the polyp. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the patients' pain score, satisfaction score using visual analogue score (VAS), and efficacy of the technique in alleviating symptoms in patients with AUB due to polyps.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty patients participated, with a mean age of 54.8 ± 11 years. Average polyp volume was 1.87 cm<sup>3</sup> and mean duration for polypectomy was 11 minutes 31 seconds. The median pain score immediately post-procedure was 5 (0–9). We were unable to complete the procedure in two patients due to patient discomfort and poor visualization. Complete removal of polyp was ensured by checking for a thin endometrial echo at the end of the procedure and by performing SIS at 3-months post-procedure. Of the 22 patients who returned for follow-up, 19 (86.36%) showed no evidence of polyp on SIS and all reported resolution of AUB symptoms. The median satisfaction score at the follow-up was 10/10. Adequate pathology samples were obtained from all cases, diagnosing malignancy in one and endometrial hyperplasia in one patient.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This technique offers safe and effective removal of pedunculated endometrial polyps in an office setting, avoiding the need for general anesthesia. It can be offered as a therapeutic option at the initial point of contact, providing symptom relief and tissue diagnosis while reducing costs and patient visits.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 11\",\"pages\":\"2169-2175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16548\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
To present a novel technique for office resection of pedunculated endometrial polyps under ultrasound guidance.
Methods
A prospective trial was conducted at an academic center where women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) who were diagnosed an endometrial polyp following saline infusion sonogram (SIS), were offered polyp removal under ultrasound guidance using a universal grasping forceps (2.5 mm × 25 cm). The primary outcome was to evaluate the feasibility of this technique for complete removal of the polyp. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the patients' pain score, satisfaction score using visual analogue score (VAS), and efficacy of the technique in alleviating symptoms in patients with AUB due to polyps.
Results
Thirty patients participated, with a mean age of 54.8 ± 11 years. Average polyp volume was 1.87 cm3 and mean duration for polypectomy was 11 minutes 31 seconds. The median pain score immediately post-procedure was 5 (0–9). We were unable to complete the procedure in two patients due to patient discomfort and poor visualization. Complete removal of polyp was ensured by checking for a thin endometrial echo at the end of the procedure and by performing SIS at 3-months post-procedure. Of the 22 patients who returned for follow-up, 19 (86.36%) showed no evidence of polyp on SIS and all reported resolution of AUB symptoms. The median satisfaction score at the follow-up was 10/10. Adequate pathology samples were obtained from all cases, diagnosing malignancy in one and endometrial hyperplasia in one patient.
Conclusion
This technique offers safe and effective removal of pedunculated endometrial polyps in an office setting, avoiding the need for general anesthesia. It can be offered as a therapeutic option at the initial point of contact, providing symptom relief and tissue diagnosis while reducing costs and patient visits.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound