评估前期使用雄激素受体信号抑制剂后对阉割耐药前列腺癌的二线治疗。

IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Prostate Cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/9303603
Kazuro Kikkawa, Masahiro Tamaki, Kouhei Maruno, Tatsuya Hazama, Toshifumi Takahashi, Yuya Yamada, Masakazu Nakashima, Noriyuki Ito
{"title":"评估前期使用雄激素受体信号抑制剂后对阉割耐药前列腺癌的二线治疗。","authors":"Kazuro Kikkawa, Masahiro Tamaki, Kouhei Maruno, Tatsuya Hazama, Toshifumi Takahashi, Yuya Yamada, Masakazu Nakashima, Noriyuki Ito","doi":"10.1155/2024/9303603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effects of docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatments in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as first-line treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of second-line treatment with docetaxel or androgen receptor signaling inhibitor in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received first-line treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. Clinical backgrounds and outcomes were compared between docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatment. Of 59 patients, 21 (35.6%) and 38 (64.4%) received docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatment after first-line treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, respectively. In the second-line setting, the median progression-free survival was longer with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor than with docetaxel (17 versus 6 months, <i>P</i>=0.014). In the first-line setting, the median progression-free survival was longer with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors than with docetaxel (32 versus 25 months, <i>P</i>=0.014); however, no significant difference was found in the overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that there was no significant association between second-line treatment and survival, and first-line treatment with abiraterone was identified as a prognostic factor for progression-free survival. Subgroup analysis showed that the abiraterone-enzalutamide sequence was more effective than the other three sequences for progression-free survival and overall survival. This study suggests that second-line treatment with an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor for castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as first-line treatment may be more beneficial, particularly with abiraterone as the upfront treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20907,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer","volume":"2024 ","pages":"9303603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Second-Line Treatment for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer following the Administration of Upfront Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuro Kikkawa, Masahiro Tamaki, Kouhei Maruno, Tatsuya Hazama, Toshifumi Takahashi, Yuya Yamada, Masakazu Nakashima, Noriyuki Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/9303603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the effects of docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatments in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as first-line treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of second-line treatment with docetaxel or androgen receptor signaling inhibitor in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received first-line treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. Clinical backgrounds and outcomes were compared between docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatment. Of 59 patients, 21 (35.6%) and 38 (64.4%) received docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatment after first-line treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, respectively. In the second-line setting, the median progression-free survival was longer with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor than with docetaxel (17 versus 6 months, <i>P</i>=0.014). In the first-line setting, the median progression-free survival was longer with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors than with docetaxel (32 versus 25 months, <i>P</i>=0.014); however, no significant difference was found in the overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that there was no significant association between second-line treatment and survival, and first-line treatment with abiraterone was identified as a prognostic factor for progression-free survival. Subgroup analysis showed that the abiraterone-enzalutamide sequence was more effective than the other three sequences for progression-free survival and overall survival. This study suggests that second-line treatment with an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor for castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as first-line treatment may be more beneficial, particularly with abiraterone as the upfront treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate Cancer\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"9303603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9303603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9303603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了多西他赛和雄激素受体信号转导抑制剂作为二线治疗药物对接受雄激素受体信号转导抑制剂一线治疗后的阉割耐药前列腺癌患者的治疗效果。本研究回顾性评估了接受雄激素受体信号抑制剂一线治疗的阉割耐药前列腺癌患者接受多西他赛或雄激素受体信号抑制剂二线治疗的临床结果。比较了多西他赛和雄激素受体信号抑制剂作为二线治疗的临床背景和疗效。在59名患者中,分别有21人(35.6%)和38人(64.4%)在接受雄激素受体信号抑制剂一线治疗后接受了多西他赛和雄激素受体信号抑制剂的二线治疗。在二线治疗中,雄激素受体信号抑制剂的中位无进展生存期长于多西他赛(17个月对6个月,P=0.014)。在一线治疗中,雄激素受体信号抑制剂的中位无进展生存期长于多西他赛(32个月对25个月,P=0.014);但在总生存期方面没有发现显著差异。多变量分析显示,二线治疗与生存期之间没有显著关联,而阿比特龙一线治疗被认为是无进展生存期的预后因素。亚组分析显示,在无进展生存期和总生存期方面,阿比特龙-苯扎鲁胺序列比其他三种序列更有效。这项研究表明,在使用雄激素受体信号转导抑制剂作为一线治疗后,使用雄激素受体信号转导抑制剂对阉割耐药前列腺癌进行二线治疗可能更有益,尤其是使用阿比特龙作为前期治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Second-Line Treatment for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer following the Administration of Upfront Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors.

This study evaluated the effects of docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatments in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as first-line treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of second-line treatment with docetaxel or androgen receptor signaling inhibitor in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received first-line treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. Clinical backgrounds and outcomes were compared between docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatment. Of 59 patients, 21 (35.6%) and 38 (64.4%) received docetaxel and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as second-line treatment after first-line treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, respectively. In the second-line setting, the median progression-free survival was longer with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor than with docetaxel (17 versus 6 months, P=0.014). In the first-line setting, the median progression-free survival was longer with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors than with docetaxel (32 versus 25 months, P=0.014); however, no significant difference was found in the overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that there was no significant association between second-line treatment and survival, and first-line treatment with abiraterone was identified as a prognostic factor for progression-free survival. Subgroup analysis showed that the abiraterone-enzalutamide sequence was more effective than the other three sequences for progression-free survival and overall survival. This study suggests that second-line treatment with an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor for castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen receptor signaling inhibitors as first-line treatment may be more beneficial, particularly with abiraterone as the upfront treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Prostate Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a multidisciplinary platform for scientists, surgeons, oncologists and clinicians working on prostate cancer. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management of the disease.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Relationship of G-137C, C-607A, and A-1447G Polymorphisms in the Promoter of IL-18 and CXCL10 Inflammatory Genes with Prostate Cancer in an Iranian Population. Evaluation of Second-Line Treatment for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer following the Administration of Upfront Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors. Health-Related and Psychosocial Factors Associated with Prostate Cancer Stage at Diagnosis among Males Participating in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Multimodality Functional Imaging Study to Evaluate Neuroinflammation. Randomized, Open-Label Phase 2 Study of Apalutamide plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy versus Apalutamide Monotherapy versus Androgen Deprivation Monotherapy in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1