Jernej Rosker, Tinka Leskovec, Katja Tomazin, Ziva Majcen Rosker
{"title":"瞳孔测量作为姿势控制的生物标记:深度学习模型揭示了特定侧瞳孔对增加平衡任务强度的反应。","authors":"Jernej Rosker, Tinka Leskovec, Katja Tomazin, Ziva Majcen Rosker","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pupillometry has been used in the studies of postural control to assess cognitive load during dual tasks, but its response to increased balance task intensity has not been investigated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether side-specific changes in pupil diameter occur with more demanding balance tasks providing additional insights into postural control. The two aims of this study were to analyze differences in steady-state pupil diameter between balance tasks with increased intensity and to determine whether there are side-specific changes. Forty-eight healthy subjects performed parallel and left and right one-legged stances on a force plate with and without foam with right and left pupil diameters measured with a mobile infrared eye-tracker. Differences between balance tasks in parameters (average pupil diameter of each eye, average of both pupil diameters and the difference between the left and right pupil diameter) were analyzed using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and deep learning neural network models were used to investigate how pupillometry predicted each balance task. The pupil diameter of the left eye, the average pupil diameter of both eyes and the difference in pupil diameters increased statistically significantly from simpler to more demanding balance tasks, with this being more pronounced for the left eye. The deep learning neural network models revealed side-specific changes in pupil diameter with more demanding balance tasks. This study confirms pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance task and indicates side-specific pupil responses that could be related to task-specific involvement of higher levels of postural control.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pupillometry as a biomarker of postural control: Deep-learning models reveal side-specific pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Jernej Rosker, Tinka Leskovec, Katja Tomazin, Ziva Majcen Rosker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.14667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pupillometry has been used in the studies of postural control to assess cognitive load during dual tasks, but its response to increased balance task intensity has not been investigated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether side-specific changes in pupil diameter occur with more demanding balance tasks providing additional insights into postural control. The two aims of this study were to analyze differences in steady-state pupil diameter between balance tasks with increased intensity and to determine whether there are side-specific changes. Forty-eight healthy subjects performed parallel and left and right one-legged stances on a force plate with and without foam with right and left pupil diameters measured with a mobile infrared eye-tracker. Differences between balance tasks in parameters (average pupil diameter of each eye, average of both pupil diameters and the difference between the left and right pupil diameter) were analyzed using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and deep learning neural network models were used to investigate how pupillometry predicted each balance task. The pupil diameter of the left eye, the average pupil diameter of both eyes and the difference in pupil diameters increased statistically significantly from simpler to more demanding balance tasks, with this being more pronounced for the left eye. The deep learning neural network models revealed side-specific changes in pupil diameter with more demanding balance tasks. This study confirms pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance task and indicates side-specific pupil responses that could be related to task-specific involvement of higher levels of postural control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14667\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pupillometry as a biomarker of postural control: Deep-learning models reveal side-specific pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance tasks.
Pupillometry has been used in the studies of postural control to assess cognitive load during dual tasks, but its response to increased balance task intensity has not been investigated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether side-specific changes in pupil diameter occur with more demanding balance tasks providing additional insights into postural control. The two aims of this study were to analyze differences in steady-state pupil diameter between balance tasks with increased intensity and to determine whether there are side-specific changes. Forty-eight healthy subjects performed parallel and left and right one-legged stances on a force plate with and without foam with right and left pupil diameters measured with a mobile infrared eye-tracker. Differences between balance tasks in parameters (average pupil diameter of each eye, average of both pupil diameters and the difference between the left and right pupil diameter) were analyzed using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and deep learning neural network models were used to investigate how pupillometry predicted each balance task. The pupil diameter of the left eye, the average pupil diameter of both eyes and the difference in pupil diameters increased statistically significantly from simpler to more demanding balance tasks, with this being more pronounced for the left eye. The deep learning neural network models revealed side-specific changes in pupil diameter with more demanding balance tasks. This study confirms pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance task and indicates side-specific pupil responses that could be related to task-specific involvement of higher levels of postural control.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.