Teodora M Gencheva, Bozhidar V Valkov, Sevdalina S Kandilarova, Michael H J Maes, Drozdstoy S Stoyanov
{"title":"双相情感障碍的结构连接、功能连接和有效连接的诊断价值。","authors":"Teodora M Gencheva, Bozhidar V Valkov, Sevdalina S Kandilarova, Michael H J Maes, Drozdstoy S Stoyanov","doi":"10.1111/acps.13742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to assess the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of bipolar disorder (BD) patients that characterize differences in terms of structural, functional, and effective connectivity between the patients with BD, patients with other psychiatric disorders and healthy controls as possible biomarkers for diagnosing the disorder using neuroimaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), guidelines a systematic search for recent (since 2015) original studies on connectivity in bipolar disorder was conducted in PUBMED and SCOPUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 studies were included in this systematic review: 20 of the structural connectivity, 33 of the functional connectivity, and only 7 of the studies focused on effective connectivity complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite the great heterogeneity in the findings, there are several trends that emerge. In structural connectivity studies, the main abnormalities in bipolar disorder patients were in the frontal gyrus, anterior, as well as posterior cingulate cortex and differences in emotion and reward-related networks. Cerebellum (vermis) to cerebrum functional connectivity was found to be the most common finding in BD. Moreover, prefrontal cortex and amygdala connectivity as part of the rich-club hubs were often reported to be disrupted. The most common findings based on effective connectivity were alterations in salience network, default mode network and executive control network. Although more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to ascertain altered brain connectivity as diagnostic biomarker, there is a perspective that the method could be used as a single marker of diagnosis in the future, and the process of adoption could be accelerated by using approaches such as semiunsupervised machine learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of structural, functional and effective connectivity in bipolar disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Teodora M Gencheva, Bozhidar V Valkov, Sevdalina S Kandilarova, Michael H J Maes, Drozdstoy S Stoyanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.13742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to assess the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of bipolar disorder (BD) patients that characterize differences in terms of structural, functional, and effective connectivity between the patients with BD, patients with other psychiatric disorders and healthy controls as possible biomarkers for diagnosing the disorder using neuroimaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), guidelines a systematic search for recent (since 2015) original studies on connectivity in bipolar disorder was conducted in PUBMED and SCOPUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 studies were included in this systematic review: 20 of the structural connectivity, 33 of the functional connectivity, and only 7 of the studies focused on effective connectivity complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite the great heterogeneity in the findings, there are several trends that emerge. In structural connectivity studies, the main abnormalities in bipolar disorder patients were in the frontal gyrus, anterior, as well as posterior cingulate cortex and differences in emotion and reward-related networks. Cerebellum (vermis) to cerebrum functional connectivity was found to be the most common finding in BD. Moreover, prefrontal cortex and amygdala connectivity as part of the rich-club hubs were often reported to be disrupted. The most common findings based on effective connectivity were alterations in salience network, default mode network and executive control network. Although more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to ascertain altered brain connectivity as diagnostic biomarker, there is a perspective that the method could be used as a single marker of diagnosis in the future, and the process of adoption could be accelerated by using approaches such as semiunsupervised machine learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13742\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic value of structural, functional and effective connectivity in bipolar disorder.
Introduction: The aim of this systematic review is to assess the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of bipolar disorder (BD) patients that characterize differences in terms of structural, functional, and effective connectivity between the patients with BD, patients with other psychiatric disorders and healthy controls as possible biomarkers for diagnosing the disorder using neuroimaging.
Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), guidelines a systematic search for recent (since 2015) original studies on connectivity in bipolar disorder was conducted in PUBMED and SCOPUS.
Results: A total of 60 studies were included in this systematic review: 20 of the structural connectivity, 33 of the functional connectivity, and only 7 of the studies focused on effective connectivity complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Discussion: Despite the great heterogeneity in the findings, there are several trends that emerge. In structural connectivity studies, the main abnormalities in bipolar disorder patients were in the frontal gyrus, anterior, as well as posterior cingulate cortex and differences in emotion and reward-related networks. Cerebellum (vermis) to cerebrum functional connectivity was found to be the most common finding in BD. Moreover, prefrontal cortex and amygdala connectivity as part of the rich-club hubs were often reported to be disrupted. The most common findings based on effective connectivity were alterations in salience network, default mode network and executive control network. Although more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to ascertain altered brain connectivity as diagnostic biomarker, there is a perspective that the method could be used as a single marker of diagnosis in the future, and the process of adoption could be accelerated by using approaches such as semiunsupervised machine learning.
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.