{"title":"开始使用 Ustekinumab 或 Adalimumab 的晚期治疗无效或有经验的溃疡性结肠炎患者的实际治疗持续率。","authors":"Maryia Zhdanava, Sumesh Kachroo, Porpong Boonmak, Sabree Burbage, Aditi Shah, Jill Korsiak, Patrick Lefebvre, Caroline Kerner, Dominic Pilon","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02942-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics<sup>®</sup> Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015–06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (<i>n</i> = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29–4.16); <i>p</i> < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63–2.45); <i>p</i> < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07–3.44); <i>p</i> < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76–6.44); <i>p</i> < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (<i>n</i> = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (<i>n</i> = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82–3.26); <i>p</i> < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01–1.54); <i>p</i> = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00–3.21); <i>p</i> < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09–7.35); <i>p</i> < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (<i>n</i> = 254).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"41 10","pages":"3868 - 3887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab\",\"authors\":\"Maryia Zhdanava, Sumesh Kachroo, Porpong Boonmak, Sabree Burbage, Aditi Shah, Jill Korsiak, Patrick Lefebvre, Caroline Kerner, Dominic Pilon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-02942-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics<sup>®</sup> Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015–06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (<i>n</i> = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29–4.16); <i>p</i> < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63–2.45); <i>p</i> < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07–3.44); <i>p</i> < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76–6.44); <i>p</i> < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (<i>n</i> = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (<i>n</i> = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82–3.26); <i>p</i> < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01–1.54); <i>p</i> = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00–3.21); <i>p</i> < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09–7.35); <i>p</i> < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (<i>n</i> = 254).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\"41 10\",\"pages\":\"3868 - 3887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02942-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02942-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab
Introduction
Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.
Methods
Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015–06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients.
Results
At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29–4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63–2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07–3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76–6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82–3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01–1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00–3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09–7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254).
Conclusion
This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.