在非侵入性和微创样本中检测口腔癌的 DNA 甲基化标记:系统综述。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Clinical Epigenetics Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1186/s13148-024-01716-9
Óscar Rapado-González, Sofia Salta, Rafael López-López, Rui Henrique, María Mercedes Suárez-Cunqueiro, Carmen Jerónimo
{"title":"在非侵入性和微创样本中检测口腔癌的 DNA 甲基化标记:系统综述。","authors":"Óscar Rapado-González, Sofia Salta, Rafael López-López, Rui Henrique, María Mercedes Suárez-Cunqueiro, Carmen Jerónimo","doi":"10.1186/s13148-024-01716-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 50% of oral cancer (OC) patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease associated with poor prognosis and quality of life, supporting an urgent need to improve early OC detection. The identification of effective molecular markers by minimally invasive approaches has emerged as a promising strategy for OC screening. This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the performance of the DNA methylation markers identified in non- or minimally invasive samples for OC detection. PubMed's MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies that evaluated DNA methylation markers in non-invasive and/or minimally invasive samples (oral rinse/saliva, oral brush, and blood) from OC patients. Two investigators independently extracted data on study population characteristics, candidate methylation markers, testing samples, DNA methylation assay, and performance diagnostic outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2 tool. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. DNA methylation markers were evaluated in oral rinse/saliva (n = 17), oral brush (n = 9), and blood (n = 7) samples. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and quantitative-MSP were the most common DNA methylation assays. Regarding diagnostic performance values for salivary, oral brush, and blood DNA methylation markers, sensitivity and specificity ranged between 3.4-100% and 21-100%, 9-100% and 26.8-100%, 22-70% and 45.45-100%, respectively. Different gene methylation panels showed good diagnostic performance for OC detection. This systematic review discloses the promising value of testing DNA methylation markers in non-invasive (saliva or oral rinse) or minimally invasive (oral brush or blood) samples as a novel strategy for OC detection. However, further validation in large, multicenter, and prospective study cohorts must be carried out to confirm the clinical value of specific DNA methylation markers in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":10366,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epigenetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DNA methylation markers for oral cancer detection in non- and minimally invasive samples: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Óscar Rapado-González, Sofia Salta, Rafael López-López, Rui Henrique, María Mercedes Suárez-Cunqueiro, Carmen Jerónimo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13148-024-01716-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>More than 50% of oral cancer (OC) patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease associated with poor prognosis and quality of life, supporting an urgent need to improve early OC detection. The identification of effective molecular markers by minimally invasive approaches has emerged as a promising strategy for OC screening. This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the performance of the DNA methylation markers identified in non- or minimally invasive samples for OC detection. PubMed's MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies that evaluated DNA methylation markers in non-invasive and/or minimally invasive samples (oral rinse/saliva, oral brush, and blood) from OC patients. Two investigators independently extracted data on study population characteristics, candidate methylation markers, testing samples, DNA methylation assay, and performance diagnostic outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2 tool. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. DNA methylation markers were evaluated in oral rinse/saliva (n = 17), oral brush (n = 9), and blood (n = 7) samples. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and quantitative-MSP were the most common DNA methylation assays. Regarding diagnostic performance values for salivary, oral brush, and blood DNA methylation markers, sensitivity and specificity ranged between 3.4-100% and 21-100%, 9-100% and 26.8-100%, 22-70% and 45.45-100%, respectively. Different gene methylation panels showed good diagnostic performance for OC detection. This systematic review discloses the promising value of testing DNA methylation markers in non-invasive (saliva or oral rinse) or minimally invasive (oral brush or blood) samples as a novel strategy for OC detection. However, further validation in large, multicenter, and prospective study cohorts must be carried out to confirm the clinical value of specific DNA methylation markers in this setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epigenetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323632/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epigenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-024-01716-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epigenetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-024-01716-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

50%以上的口腔癌(OC)患者被诊断为晚期,预后和生活质量都很差,因此迫切需要提高早期口腔癌的检测水平。通过微创方法鉴定有效的分子标记物已成为一种很有前景的口腔癌筛查策略。本系统综述总结并评估了在非侵入性或微侵入性样本中鉴定出的用于检测 OC 的 DNA 甲基化标记物的性能。我们在 PubMed 的 MEDLINE、Scopus、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中系统检索了评估 OC 患者非侵入性和/或微创样本(口腔漱口液/唾液、口腔刷和血液)中 DNA 甲基化标记物的研究。两名研究人员独立提取了有关研究人群特征、候选甲基化标记物、检测样本、DNA 甲基化检测和性能诊断结果的数据。方法学研究质量采用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具进行评估。31 项研究符合本系统综述的纳入标准。对口腔漱口水/唾液(17 份)、口腔刷(9 份)和血液(7 份)样本中的 DNA 甲基化标记进行了评估。甲基化特异性 PCR (MSP) 和定量 MSP 是最常见的 DNA 甲基化检测方法。关于唾液、口腔刷和血液 DNA 甲基化标记物的诊断性能值,灵敏度和特异性分别为 3.4-100% 和 21-100%、9-100% 和 26.8-100%、22-70% 和 45.45-100%。不同的基因甲基化面板在 OC 检测中表现出良好的诊断性能。本系统综述揭示了在非侵入性样本(唾液或口腔漱口水)或微侵入性样本(口腔刷或血液)中检测DNA甲基化标记物作为OC检测新策略的前景。不过,还必须在大型、多中心和前瞻性研究队列中进行进一步验证,以确认特定 DNA 甲基化标记物在这种情况下的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DNA methylation markers for oral cancer detection in non- and minimally invasive samples: a systematic review.

More than 50% of oral cancer (OC) patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease associated with poor prognosis and quality of life, supporting an urgent need to improve early OC detection. The identification of effective molecular markers by minimally invasive approaches has emerged as a promising strategy for OC screening. This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the performance of the DNA methylation markers identified in non- or minimally invasive samples for OC detection. PubMed's MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies that evaluated DNA methylation markers in non-invasive and/or minimally invasive samples (oral rinse/saliva, oral brush, and blood) from OC patients. Two investigators independently extracted data on study population characteristics, candidate methylation markers, testing samples, DNA methylation assay, and performance diagnostic outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2 tool. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. DNA methylation markers were evaluated in oral rinse/saliva (n = 17), oral brush (n = 9), and blood (n = 7) samples. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and quantitative-MSP were the most common DNA methylation assays. Regarding diagnostic performance values for salivary, oral brush, and blood DNA methylation markers, sensitivity and specificity ranged between 3.4-100% and 21-100%, 9-100% and 26.8-100%, 22-70% and 45.45-100%, respectively. Different gene methylation panels showed good diagnostic performance for OC detection. This systematic review discloses the promising value of testing DNA methylation markers in non-invasive (saliva or oral rinse) or minimally invasive (oral brush or blood) samples as a novel strategy for OC detection. However, further validation in large, multicenter, and prospective study cohorts must be carried out to confirm the clinical value of specific DNA methylation markers in this setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Clinical Epigenetics, the official journal of the Clinical Epigenetics Society, is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of epigenetic principles and mechanisms in relation to human disease, diagnosis and therapy. Clinical trials and research in disease model organisms are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Effects of multisuperovulation on the transcription and genomic methylation of oocytes and offspring. Causal effects of cardiovascular health on five epigenetic clocks. Causal association of epigenetic age acceleration and risk of subacute thyroiditis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study Technical and biological sources of unreliability of Infinium probes on Illumina methylation microarrays Methylation alterations of imprinted genes in different placental diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1