评估肺炎球菌结合疫苗免疫接种计划从 3+0 改为 2+1 对澳大利亚儿童的影响:回顾性观察研究。

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae377
Sanjay Jayasinghe, Phoebe C M Williams, Kristine K Macartney, Nigel W Crawford, Christopher C Blyth
{"title":"评估肺炎球菌结合疫苗免疫接种计划从 3+0 改为 2+1 对澳大利亚儿童的影响:回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Sanjay Jayasinghe, Phoebe C M Williams, Kristine K Macartney, Nigel W Crawford, Christopher C Blyth","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In mid-2018, the Australian childhood 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedule changed from 3+0 to 2+1, moving the third dose to 12 months of age, to address increasing breakthrough cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), predominantly in children aged >12 months. This study assessed the impact of this change using national IPD surveillance data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and postschedule change 3-dose 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine breakthrough cases were compared by age group, serotype, and clinical syndrome. Annual rates of breakthrough cases were calculated (per 100 000) using respective birth cohort sizes and 3-dose vaccine coverage. Using time-series modelling, observed IPD rates in children aged <12 years were compared to that expected if the 3+0 schedule were continued.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Over 2012-2022, rate of 3-dose breakthrough cases in children aged >12 months was 2.8 per 100 000 (n = 557; 11 birth cohorts). Serotype 3 replaced 19A as predominant breakthrough serotype (respectively, 24% and 65% in 2013 to 60% and 20% in 2022) followed by 19F. In breakthrough cases, the most frequent clinical phenotype was bacteremic pneumonia (69%), with meningitis accounting for 3%-4%. In cohorts eligible for 2+1 versus 3+0 schedules, rate of breakthrough cases was lower for all vaccine serotypes, except type 3 (incidence rate ratio, 0.50 [95% confidence interval, .28-.84] and 1.12 [0.71-1.76], respectively). Observed compared to expected IPD was 51.7% lower (95% confidence interval, -60.9 to -40.7%) for vaccine serotypes, but the change for nonvaccine types was not significant 12% (-9.6 to 39.7).</p><p><strong>Interpretations: </strong>The 2+1 schedule is likely superior to 3+0 for overall IPD control, a finding that may be worth consideration for other countries considering or using 3+0 PCV schedules.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Impact of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Immunization Schedule Change From 3+0 to 2+1 in Australian Children: A Retrospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjay Jayasinghe, Phoebe C M Williams, Kristine K Macartney, Nigel W Crawford, Christopher C Blyth\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cid/ciae377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In mid-2018, the Australian childhood 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedule changed from 3+0 to 2+1, moving the third dose to 12 months of age, to address increasing breakthrough cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), predominantly in children aged >12 months. This study assessed the impact of this change using national IPD surveillance data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and postschedule change 3-dose 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine breakthrough cases were compared by age group, serotype, and clinical syndrome. Annual rates of breakthrough cases were calculated (per 100 000) using respective birth cohort sizes and 3-dose vaccine coverage. Using time-series modelling, observed IPD rates in children aged <12 years were compared to that expected if the 3+0 schedule were continued.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Over 2012-2022, rate of 3-dose breakthrough cases in children aged >12 months was 2.8 per 100 000 (n = 557; 11 birth cohorts). Serotype 3 replaced 19A as predominant breakthrough serotype (respectively, 24% and 65% in 2013 to 60% and 20% in 2022) followed by 19F. In breakthrough cases, the most frequent clinical phenotype was bacteremic pneumonia (69%), with meningitis accounting for 3%-4%. In cohorts eligible for 2+1 versus 3+0 schedules, rate of breakthrough cases was lower for all vaccine serotypes, except type 3 (incidence rate ratio, 0.50 [95% confidence interval, .28-.84] and 1.12 [0.71-1.76], respectively). Observed compared to expected IPD was 51.7% lower (95% confidence interval, -60.9 to -40.7%) for vaccine serotypes, but the change for nonvaccine types was not significant 12% (-9.6 to 39.7).</p><p><strong>Interpretations: </strong>The 2+1 schedule is likely superior to 3+0 for overall IPD control, a finding that may be worth consideration for other countries considering or using 3+0 PCV schedules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae377\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae377","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2018 年年中,澳大利亚儿童 13 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗接种计划从 3+0 改为 2+1,将第三剂移至 12 个月大,以应对日益增多的侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病 (IPD) 突破性病例(主要发生在年龄大于 12 个月的儿童中)。本研究利用全国 IPD 监测数据评估了这一变化的影响:方法:按年龄组、血清型和临床综合征对接种三剂 13 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗前后的破伤风病例进行比较。根据各自的出生队列规模和三剂疫苗接种覆盖率计算破伤风病例的年发生率(每 10 万人)。通过时间序列建模,观察了年龄在 5 岁以下的儿童的 IPD 率:在 2012-2022 年间,年龄大于 12 个月的儿童中 3 剂疫苗的突破性病例率为每 10 万人中 2.8 例(n = 557;11 个出生队列)。血清型 3 取代 19A 成为主要的突破性血清型(分别从 2013 年的 24% 和 65% 到 2022 年的 60% 和 20%),其次是 19F。在突破性病例中,最常见的临床表型是菌血症性肺炎(69%),脑膜炎占 3%-4%。在符合 2+1 与 3+0 接种条件的队列中,除 3 型外,所有疫苗血清型的突破性病例率都较低(发病率比分别为 0.50 [95% 置信区间为 0.28-.84] 和 1.12 [0.71-1.76])。与预期相比,疫苗血清型的观察IPD降低了51.7%(95%置信区间,-60.9%至-40.7%),但非疫苗类型的变化并不显著,为12%(-9.6%至39.7%):2+1方案在总体IPD控制方面可能优于3+0方案,这一发现值得其他考虑或使用3+0 PCV方案的国家借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Impact of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Immunization Schedule Change From 3+0 to 2+1 in Australian Children: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background: In mid-2018, the Australian childhood 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedule changed from 3+0 to 2+1, moving the third dose to 12 months of age, to address increasing breakthrough cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), predominantly in children aged >12 months. This study assessed the impact of this change using national IPD surveillance data.

Methods: Pre- and postschedule change 3-dose 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine breakthrough cases were compared by age group, serotype, and clinical syndrome. Annual rates of breakthrough cases were calculated (per 100 000) using respective birth cohort sizes and 3-dose vaccine coverage. Using time-series modelling, observed IPD rates in children aged <12 years were compared to that expected if the 3+0 schedule were continued.

Findings: Over 2012-2022, rate of 3-dose breakthrough cases in children aged >12 months was 2.8 per 100 000 (n = 557; 11 birth cohorts). Serotype 3 replaced 19A as predominant breakthrough serotype (respectively, 24% and 65% in 2013 to 60% and 20% in 2022) followed by 19F. In breakthrough cases, the most frequent clinical phenotype was bacteremic pneumonia (69%), with meningitis accounting for 3%-4%. In cohorts eligible for 2+1 versus 3+0 schedules, rate of breakthrough cases was lower for all vaccine serotypes, except type 3 (incidence rate ratio, 0.50 [95% confidence interval, .28-.84] and 1.12 [0.71-1.76], respectively). Observed compared to expected IPD was 51.7% lower (95% confidence interval, -60.9 to -40.7%) for vaccine serotypes, but the change for nonvaccine types was not significant 12% (-9.6 to 39.7).

Interpretations: The 2+1 schedule is likely superior to 3+0 for overall IPD control, a finding that may be worth consideration for other countries considering or using 3+0 PCV schedules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
OPAT and Severe Sepsis Mortality. Global trends in CD4 count measurement and distribution at first antiretroviral treatment initiation. Gauging Medical Students' Interests in Infectious Diseases. Fatal borealpox in an immunosuppressed patient treated with antivirals and vaccinia immunoglobulin - Alaska, 2023. Current and future strategies for the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infections in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1