Kelcie D Willis, Emily A Walsh, Laura E Dunderdale, Kathryn Post, Nora Horick, Michael H Antoni, Steven A Safren, Ann H Partridge, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Elyse R Park, Jennifer S Temel, Joseph A Greer, Jamie M Jacobs
{"title":"辅助内分泌治疗特定认知对乳腺癌患者辅助内分泌治疗依从性行为干预反应的影响。","authors":"Kelcie D Willis, Emily A Walsh, Laura E Dunderdale, Kathryn Post, Nora Horick, Michael H Antoni, Steven A Safren, Ann H Partridge, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Elyse R Park, Jennifer S Temel, Joseph A Greer, Jamie M Jacobs","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is a life-saving medication for patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, yet many struggle with adherence, warranting behavioral intervention. In our recent trial, participation in a group cognitive behavioral intervention (STRIDE) for symptom management and adherence was associated with improvements in symptom distress, coping, quality of life, and mood. We now explore whether baseline patient- and medication-specific factors-which may be modifiable by clinician-led discussions-moderated the effect of STRIDE on adherence rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2019 to June 2021, 100 patients with early-stage breast cancer reporting AET-related distress were enrolled and randomly assigned to STRIDE or a medication monitoring (MM) control group. All patients stored their AET in electronic pill bottles to track objective adherence. Patients also self-reported their adherence on the Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 and their perceptions of AET on the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire at baseline. We conducted hierarchical linear modeling to test moderators of intervention effects on objective adherence rates. We report the time × group × moderator effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients reporting greater perceived difficulties with AET adherence at baseline, STRIDE participants had higher adherence rates over time compared with MM (<i>b</i> = -13.80; SE = 4.56; <i>P</i> < .01). Patients with greater expectations of therapeutic benefit from AET also had improved adherence rates if they were assigned to STRIDE, versus MM (<i>b</i> = 0.25; SE = 0.10; <i>P</i> = .01). Patients who perceived taking AET as convenient and had been taking their AET for less time had higher adherence rates in STRIDE, versus MM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study identified patient- and medication-specific factors that may augment AET adherence interventions and may be modifiable through clinician-led discussions, such as perceptions of adherence problems, therapeutic efficacy, and convenience of AET.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy-Specific Perceptions on Response to a Behavioral Intervention for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Adherence in Patients With Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Kelcie D Willis, Emily A Walsh, Laura E Dunderdale, Kathryn Post, Nora Horick, Michael H Antoni, Steven A Safren, Ann H Partridge, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Elyse R Park, Jennifer S Temel, Joseph A Greer, Jamie M Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP.24.00316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is a life-saving medication for patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, yet many struggle with adherence, warranting behavioral intervention. In our recent trial, participation in a group cognitive behavioral intervention (STRIDE) for symptom management and adherence was associated with improvements in symptom distress, coping, quality of life, and mood. We now explore whether baseline patient- and medication-specific factors-which may be modifiable by clinician-led discussions-moderated the effect of STRIDE on adherence rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2019 to June 2021, 100 patients with early-stage breast cancer reporting AET-related distress were enrolled and randomly assigned to STRIDE or a medication monitoring (MM) control group. All patients stored their AET in electronic pill bottles to track objective adherence. Patients also self-reported their adherence on the Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 and their perceptions of AET on the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire at baseline. We conducted hierarchical linear modeling to test moderators of intervention effects on objective adherence rates. We report the time × group × moderator effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients reporting greater perceived difficulties with AET adherence at baseline, STRIDE participants had higher adherence rates over time compared with MM (<i>b</i> = -13.80; SE = 4.56; <i>P</i> < .01). Patients with greater expectations of therapeutic benefit from AET also had improved adherence rates if they were assigned to STRIDE, versus MM (<i>b</i> = 0.25; SE = 0.10; <i>P</i> = .01). Patients who perceived taking AET as convenient and had been taking their AET for less time had higher adherence rates in STRIDE, versus MM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study identified patient- and medication-specific factors that may augment AET adherence interventions and may be modifiable through clinician-led discussions, such as perceptions of adherence problems, therapeutic efficacy, and convenience of AET.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:对于激素敏感性乳腺癌患者来说,辅助内分泌治疗(AET)是一种挽救生命的药物,但许多患者在坚持治疗方面存在困难,因此需要进行行为干预。在我们最近进行的试验中,参加针对症状管理和依从性的团体认知行为干预(STRIDE)与症状困扰、应对、生活质量和情绪的改善有关。现在,我们将探讨基线患者和药物特异性因素(这些因素可能可以通过临床医生主导的讨论来改变)是否会影响 STRIDE 对依从率的影响:从2019年10月到2021年6月,100名报告AET相关困扰的早期乳腺癌患者被纳入并随机分配到STRIDE或药物监测(MM)对照组。所有患者都将其 AET 储存在电子药瓶中,以跟踪客观依从性。基线时,患者还通过 "用药依从性报告量表-5"(Medication Adherence Report Scale-5)自我报告其依从性,并通过 "癌症治疗满意度问卷"(Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire)自我报告其对 AET 的看法。我们进行了分层线性建模,以检验干预对客观依从率影响的调节因素。我们报告了时间 × 组别 × 调节因子效应:结果:在基线时报告AET依从性有较大困难的患者中,STRIDE参与者的依从率随着时间的推移高于MM(b = -13.80; SE = 4.56; P < .01)。如果患者对 AET 的治疗效果抱有更高期望,那么如果他们被分配到 STRIDE,其依从率也会高于 MM(b = 0.25;SE = 0.10;P = .01)。认为服用 AET 方便且服用 AET 时间较短的患者在 STRIDE 中的依从率高于 MM:目前的研究发现了患者和药物的特异性因素,这些因素可能会增强 AET 的依从性干预,并可通过临床医生主导的讨论进行调整,如对依从性问题、疗效和 AET 便捷性的看法。
Effects of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy-Specific Perceptions on Response to a Behavioral Intervention for Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Adherence in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Purpose: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is a life-saving medication for patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, yet many struggle with adherence, warranting behavioral intervention. In our recent trial, participation in a group cognitive behavioral intervention (STRIDE) for symptom management and adherence was associated with improvements in symptom distress, coping, quality of life, and mood. We now explore whether baseline patient- and medication-specific factors-which may be modifiable by clinician-led discussions-moderated the effect of STRIDE on adherence rates.
Methods: From October 2019 to June 2021, 100 patients with early-stage breast cancer reporting AET-related distress were enrolled and randomly assigned to STRIDE or a medication monitoring (MM) control group. All patients stored their AET in electronic pill bottles to track objective adherence. Patients also self-reported their adherence on the Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 and their perceptions of AET on the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire at baseline. We conducted hierarchical linear modeling to test moderators of intervention effects on objective adherence rates. We report the time × group × moderator effects.
Results: Among patients reporting greater perceived difficulties with AET adherence at baseline, STRIDE participants had higher adherence rates over time compared with MM (b = -13.80; SE = 4.56; P < .01). Patients with greater expectations of therapeutic benefit from AET also had improved adherence rates if they were assigned to STRIDE, versus MM (b = 0.25; SE = 0.10; P = .01). Patients who perceived taking AET as convenient and had been taking their AET for less time had higher adherence rates in STRIDE, versus MM.
Conclusion: The current study identified patient- and medication-specific factors that may augment AET adherence interventions and may be modifiable through clinician-led discussions, such as perceptions of adherence problems, therapeutic efficacy, and convenience of AET.