{"title":"在四个第一前磨牙拔除病例中,使用隐适美矫正器预测牙根移动的准确性如何?","authors":"Fanfan Dai, Yanhui Sang, Jingjing Zeng, Hongjian Wang, Yichun Pan, Jianhui Zhao, Tianmin Xu, Guang Shu","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24–5.74 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70–0.93 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57–0.65 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (−0.65 to −0.96 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (−0.75 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":"27 6","pages":"985-995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ocr.12842","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?\",\"authors\":\"Fanfan Dai, Yanhui Sang, Jingjing Zeng, Hongjian Wang, Yichun Pan, Jianhui Zhao, Tianmin Xu, Guang Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24–5.74 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70–0.93 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57–0.65 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (−0.65 to −0.96 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (−0.75 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> < .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"985-995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ocr.12842\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在比较四次第一前磨牙拔除和隐适美治疗后成人牙根移动的实现情况和预测情况:这项回顾性研究纳入了来自一个临床科室的连续 33 名成年人(22 名 I 类、9 名 Cusp-to-cusp II 类和 2 名 Cusp-to-cusp III 类),他们在拔除前磨牙后完成了第一轮矫治。将治疗前的锥束计算机断层扫描模型登记到治疗前的表面扫描牙科模型(SSDM)上,以确定治疗前整个牙列的根尖位置。然后将其复制并转移到预测的和实现的治疗后 SSDM 上,以获得预测的和实现的治疗后根尖的位置。使用配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验对预测的牙根移动(DPARMs)和实现的牙根移动(DPARMs)之间的差异进行检验:结果:在前胸方向上,上颌和下颌前牙的牙根后移效果不佳(DPARMs 为 3.24-5.74 mm,P在使用隐适美进行的四次第一前磨牙拔除治疗中,牙根移动未达到预期效果,尤其是前牙在前胸方向的移动。
How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?
Objectives
This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.
Materials and Methods
Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Results
In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24–5.74 mm DPARMs, p < .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70–0.93 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57–0.65 mm DPARMs, p < .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (−0.65 to −0.96 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (−0.75 mm DPARMs, p < .05).
Conclusions
In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.