在四个第一前磨牙拔除病例中,使用隐适美矫正器预测牙根移动的准确性如何?

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12842
Fanfan Dai, Yanhui Sang, Jingjing Zeng, Hongjian Wang, Yichun Pan, Jianhui Zhao, Tianmin Xu, Guang Shu
{"title":"在四个第一前磨牙拔除病例中,使用隐适美矫正器预测牙根移动的准确性如何?","authors":"Fanfan Dai,&nbsp;Yanhui Sang,&nbsp;Jingjing Zeng,&nbsp;Hongjian Wang,&nbsp;Yichun Pan,&nbsp;Jianhui Zhao,&nbsp;Tianmin Xu,&nbsp;Guang Shu","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24–5.74 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70–0.93 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57–0.65 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (−0.65 to −0.96 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (−0.75 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":"27 6","pages":"985-995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ocr.12842","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?\",\"authors\":\"Fanfan Dai,&nbsp;Yanhui Sang,&nbsp;Jingjing Zeng,&nbsp;Hongjian Wang,&nbsp;Yichun Pan,&nbsp;Jianhui Zhao,&nbsp;Tianmin Xu,&nbsp;Guang Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24–5.74 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70–0.93 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57–0.65 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (−0.65 to −0.96 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (−0.75 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"985-995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ocr.12842\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在比较四次第一前磨牙拔除和隐适美治疗后成人牙根移动的实现情况和预测情况:这项回顾性研究纳入了来自一个临床科室的连续 33 名成年人(22 名 I 类、9 名 Cusp-to-cusp II 类和 2 名 Cusp-to-cusp III 类),他们在拔除前磨牙后完成了第一轮矫治。将治疗前的锥束计算机断层扫描模型登记到治疗前的表面扫描牙科模型(SSDM)上,以确定治疗前整个牙列的根尖位置。然后将其复制并转移到预测的和实现的治疗后 SSDM 上,以获得预测的和实现的治疗后根尖的位置。使用配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验对预测的牙根移动(DPARMs)和实现的牙根移动(DPARMs)之间的差异进行检验:结果:在前胸方向上,上颌和下颌前牙的牙根后移效果不佳(DPARMs 为 3.24-5.74 mm,P在使用隐适美进行的四次第一前磨牙拔除治疗中,牙根移动未达到预期效果,尤其是前牙在前胸方向的移动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?

Objectives

This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results

In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24–5.74 mm DPARMs, p < .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70–0.93 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57–0.65 mm DPARMs, p < .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (−0.65 to −0.96 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (−0.75 mm DPARMs, p < .05).

Conclusions

In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and preclinical evidence on the bioeffects and movement-related implications of photobiomodulation in the orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. Biomodulation effects induced by ultrasound stimulation in periodontal cells implicated in orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. Morphologic predictors of mandibular changes induced by Sander's Bite Jumping Appliance. Euler-angle norms for tooth rotation, torque and tip. A unilateral increase in the occlusal vertical dimension of growing rats results in mandibular deviation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1